On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:55:37AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Thursday 29 April 2010 09:10:42 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Hans,
> >
> > On Thursday 29 April 2010 08:44:29 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On Thursday 29 April 2010 05:42:39 Frederi
There are three drivers that use video_ioctl2() as an unlocked_ioctl,
let them use the new video_ioctl2_unlocked.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker
---
drivers/media/video/davinci/vpfe_capture.c |2 +-
drivers/media/video/gspca/gspca.c |2 +-
drivers/media/video/hdpvr/hdpvr
These are the last remaining v4l drivers that implement the ioctl
callback.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker
---
drivers/media/video/bw-qcam.c| 11 -
drivers/media/video/c-qcam.c | 11 -
drivers/media/video/cpia.c | 11
Now that video_ioctl2() got the bkl pushed down, update its users
to use .unlocked_ioctl instead of ioctl.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker
---
drivers/media/common/saa7146_fops.c |2 +-
drivers/media/radio/dsbr100.c|2 +-
drivers/media/radio/radio
video_ioctl2 is a generic ioctl helper used by a lot of drivers.
Most of them put it as their bkl'ed .ioctl callback, then let's
pushdown the bkl inside but also provide an unlocked version for
those that use it as an unlocked ioctl.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker
---
drivers/m
struct v4l2_file_operations::ioctl for good.
It passed make allyesconfig on sparc.
Please tell me what you think.
Thanks.
Frederic Weisbecker (5):
v4l: Pushdown bkl into video_ioctl2
v4l: Use video_ioctl2_unlocked from drivers that don't want the bkl
v4l: Change use