On 7-3-2017 10:44, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> Arend Van Spriel writes:
>>>
>>>> On 2-3-2017 17:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>>> With KASAN and a couple of o
On 6-3-2017 11:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Arend Van Spriel
> wrote:
>> On 2-3-2017 17:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> The wlc_phy_table_write_nphy/wlc_phy_table_read_nphy functions always put
>>> an object
>>> on the stack,
tespace are intended here.
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
> ---
> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_n.c| 1507
> +---
> 1 file changed, 697 insertions(+), 810 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b
brcmsmac/phy/phy_n.c:17138:1: warning: the frame size of
> 2864 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>
> Here, I'm reducing the stack size by marking as many local variables as
> 'static const' as I can without changing the actual code.
Acked-by: A
me.
>
> I'm leaving the original indentation to make the review easier.
Thanks ;-)
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
> ---
> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_n.c| 178
> -
> 1 file changed, 104 insertions
On 2-3-2017 17:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The wlc_phy_table_write_nphy/wlc_phy_table_read_nphy functions always put an
> object
> on the stack, which will each require a redzone with KASAN and lead to
> possible
> stack overflow:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_n.c:
The webcam is identified as Toshiba webcam although it seems a module
from Chicony Electronics. Not sure about the model so just refering
to it as Toshiba webcam that is in Portege z30 laptop.
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel
---
drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c | 8
1 file changed, 8
On 01-07-14 12:57, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
It would help to use '-M' option with format-patch for this kind of rework.
Regards,
Arend
> ---
> Documentation/DocBook/device-drivers.tmpl |3
> MAINTAINERS |4
> drivers/Ma
On 11/30/2012 09:25 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Arend van Spriel
>> wrote:
>>> So what is the rationale here. During mainlining our drivers we had to
>>> re
On 11/29/2012 09:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
>
> Turns out a few drivers have strayed away from using the
> spinlock_t typedef and decided to use struct spinlock
> directly. This series converts these drivers to use
> spinlock_t. Each change has been compile tested
10 matches
Mail list logo
