On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 07:21:23PM +0100, Sean Young wrote:
>On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 06:04:47PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
>> Remove superfluous includes and defines.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Härdeman
>> ---
>> drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c | 12 +---
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:10:40PM +0100, Sean Young wrote:
>On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 12:04:00PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
>> The device core infrastructure is based on the presumption that
>> once a driver calls device_add(), it must be ready to accept
>> userspace interaction.
>>
>> This requi
This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds media_tree for
the kernels and architectures in the list below.
Results of the daily build of media_tree:
date: Sun May 21 05:00:17 CEST 2017
media-tree git hash:36bcba973ad478042d1ffc6e89afd92e8bd17030
media_build gi
Hi Niklas,
On Saturday 20 May 2017 20:27:41 Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> On 2017-05-10 16:36:03 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 Mar 2017 19:59:55 Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> >> Make use of the helper functions video_device_alloc() and
> >> video_device_release() to control the lifetime
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for your feedback.
On 2017-05-10 16:36:03 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> On Tuesday 14 Mar 2017 19:59:55 Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> > Make use of the helper functions video_device_alloc() and
> > video_device_release() to control the lifetime of the struct
> >
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for your feedback.
On 2017-05-10 16:22:16 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Tuesday 14 Mar 2017 19:59:43 Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> > Use rvin_reset_format() in rvin_s_dv_timings() instead of just resetting
> > a few fields. This f
Hi,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 05:15:06PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> This driver can handle SoC internal and external video bus multiplexers,
> controlled by mux controllers provided by the mux controller framework,
> such as MMIO register bitfields or GPIOs. The subdevice passes through
> the mbu
> On May 9, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> Can you test this patch? It should make the driver ignore the second
> interface with no endpoints.
> --- a/drivers/media/video/usbvision/usbvision-video.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/usbvision/usbvision-video.c
> @@ -1504,6 +1504,11 @@ static int
>
> On May 9, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> Can you test this patch? It should make the driver ignore the second
> interface with no endpoints.
> --- a/drivers/media/video/usbvision/usbvision-video.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/usbvision/usbvision-video.c
> @@ -1504,6 +1504,11 @@ static i
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 12:04:00PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
> The device core infrastructure is based on the presumption that
> once a driver calls device_add(), it must be ready to accept
> userspace interaction.
>
> This requires splitting rc_setup_rx_device() into two functions
> and reorga
10 matches
Mail list logo