Re: [PATCH -hg] Warn user that driver is backported and might not work as expected

2010-09-18 Thread Douglas Schilling Landgraf
Hi, David Ellingsworth wrote: --- a/v4l/scripts/make_kconfig.pl Sun Jun 27 17:17:06 2010 -0300 +++ b/v4l/scripts/make_kconfig.pl Fri Sep 17 11:49:02 2010 -0300 @@ -671,4 +671,13 @@ EOF2 } +print << "EOF3"; +WARNING: This is the V4L/DVB backport tree, with experimental driv

Re: [PATCH -hg] Warn user that driver is backported and might not work as expected

2010-09-18 Thread Douglas Schilling Landgraf
Hi, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Since the migration to -git, less developers are using the -hg tree. Also, some changes are happening upstream that would require much more than just compiling the tree with an older version, to be sure that the backport won't break anything, like the removal of

Re: HVR 1600 Distortion

2010-09-18 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Josh Borke wrote: > It could be the tuner card, it is over 2 years old...Why would the > analog tuner stop functioning while the digital tuner continues to > work?  Is it because the analog portion goes through a different set > of chips? Yes, the analog portion o

Re: HVR 1600 Distortion

2010-09-18 Thread Andy Walls
Yes it does. Which is nice actually: capture both digital and RF analog at the same time. :) Josh Borke wrote: >On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Devin Heitmueller > wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Josh Borke wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Andy Walls wrote: On Fri

Re: How to handle independent CA devices

2010-09-18 Thread Oliver Endriss
On Saturday 18 September 2010 14:23:29 Manu Abraham wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:17 AM, rjkm wrote: > > Manu Abraham writes: > > > >  > > You still need a mechanism to decide which tuner gets it. First one > >  > > which opens its own ca device? > >  > > Sharing the CI (multi-stream decoding

Re: HVR 1600 Distortion

2010-09-18 Thread Josh Borke
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Josh Borke wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Andy Walls wrote: >>> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 18:23 -0400, Josh Borke wrote: Thanks for the response!  Replies are in line. On Thu, Sep

Re: HVR 1600 Distortion

2010-09-18 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Josh Borke wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Andy Walls wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 18:23 -0400, Josh Borke wrote: >>> Thanks for the response!  Replies are in line. >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Andy Walls wrote: >>> > On Wed, 2010-09-15 a

Re: HVR 1600 Distortion

2010-09-18 Thread Josh Borke
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Andy Walls wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 18:23 -0400, Josh Borke wrote: >> Thanks for the response!  Replies are in line. >> >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Andy Walls wrote: >> > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 22:54 -0400, Josh Borke wrote: >> >> I've recently notice

Re: dvb-c usb device

2010-09-18 Thread Antti Palosaari
On 09/18/2010 09:23 PM, Bert Haverkamp wrote: Every couple of months I scan this mailing list for the keywords usb and dvb-c, hoping that some new device has shown up that is supported Currently there is Anysee E30C Plus and Technotrend CT-3650. About Technotrend I am not 100% sure, but I have

Re: [PATCH -hg] Warn user that driver is backported and might not work as expected

2010-09-18 Thread David Ellingsworth
> --- a/v4l/scripts/make_kconfig.pl       Sun Jun 27 17:17:06 2010 -0300 > +++ b/v4l/scripts/make_kconfig.pl       Fri Sep 17 11:49:02 2010 -0300 > @@ -671,4 +671,13 @@ > >  EOF2 >        } > +print << "EOF3"; > +WARNING: This is the V4L/DVB backport tree, with experimental drivers > +        back

Re: dvb-c usb device

2010-09-18 Thread Benny Amorsen
Bert Haverkamp writes: > Every couple of months I scan this mailing list for the keywords usb > and dvb-c, hoping that some new device has shown up that is supported > under Linux. It probably isn't much consolation, but you aren't the only one... I currently use a FireDTV DVB-C device, but it i

[cron job] v4l-dvb daily build 2.6.26 and up: ERRORS

2010-09-18 Thread Hans Verkuil
This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for the kernels and architectures in the list below. Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb: date:Sat Sep 18 19:00:11 CEST 2010 path:http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb changeset: 15160:60edc4bd92b7 git master:

Re: ibmcam (xrilink_cit) and konica webcam driver porting to gspca update

2010-09-18 Thread David Ellingsworth
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:02 PM, David Ellingsworth wrote: > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 08/31/2010 11:43 PM, David Ellingsworth wrote: >>> >>> Hans, >>> >>> I haven't had any success with this driver as of yet. My camera is >>> shown here: http://www.amaz

dvb-c usb device

2010-09-18 Thread Bert Haverkamp
Hello all, Every couple of months I scan this mailing list for the keywords usb and dvb-c, hoping that some new device has shown up that is supported under Linux. My request for information a couple of years ago turned up a few older devices that don't work well or are not sold anymore. And a clos

Re: Afatech AF9015 & MaxLinear MXL5007T dual tuner 2

2010-09-18 Thread Antti Palosaari
On 09/18/2010 04:44 PM, poma wrote: Problem: Boot from G2 (S5) aka Soft Off or Resume from G1 - S3 aka Suspend to RAM tuner #2 nonfunctional p.p.s. Boot from G2 (S5) aka Soft Off or Resume from G1 - S3 aka Suspend to RAM tuner #1 and tuner #2 functional WITH module option: dvb-core dvb_powerd

Re: RFC: control framework enhancements

2010-09-18 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Saturday, September 18, 2010 15:44:37 Andy Walls wrote: > On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 14:19 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This weekend I started converting drivers to the new control framework. > > While > > doing that I realized that the control framework needs a few enhancements.

Afatech AF9015 & MaxLinear MXL5007T dual tuner 2

2010-09-18 Thread poma
Hi There, Device: Hardware based on Afatech AF9015 USB bridge & AF9013 demodulators & MaxLinear MXL5007T tuners: Not Only TV/LifeView DUAL DVB-T USB LV52T equivalent to TerraTec Cinergy T Stick Dual RC Problem: Boot from G2 (S5) aka Soft Off or Resume from G1 - S3 aka Suspend to RAM tuner #2

Re: RFC: control framework enhancements

2010-09-18 Thread Andy Walls
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 14:19 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all, > > This weekend I started converting drivers to the new control framework. While > doing that I realized that the control framework needs a few enhancements. > Since both subdevs may have identical controls (e.g. both may have a

Re: How to handle independent CA devices

2010-09-18 Thread Manu Abraham
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:17 AM, rjkm wrote: > Manu Abraham writes: > >  > > You still need a mechanism to decide which tuner gets it. First one >  > > which opens its own ca device? >  > > Sharing the CI (multi-stream decoding) in such an automatic way >  > > would also be complicated. >  > > I t

Re: HVR 1600 Distortion

2010-09-18 Thread Andy Walls
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 18:23 -0400, Josh Borke wrote: > Thanks for the response! Replies are in line. > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 22:54 -0400, Josh Borke wrote: > >> I've recently noticed some distortion coming from my hvr1600 when > >> viewing

RFC: control framework enhancements

2010-09-18 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi all, This weekend I started converting drivers to the new control framework. While doing that I realized that the control framework needs a few enhancements. The first one is missing functionality: some drivers use different subdevs for different inputs. The vino driver is one of those (it use

Re: How to handle independent CA devices

2010-09-18 Thread James Courtier-Dutton
On 18 September 2010 01:47, rjkm wrote: > Manu Abraham writes: > >  > > You still need a mechanism to decide which tuner gets it. First one >  > > which opens its own ca device? >  > > Sharing the CI (multi-stream decoding) in such an automatic way >  > > would also be complicated. >  > > I think