Signed-off-by: Chaithrika U S
---
v4l/versions.txt |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/v4l/versions.txt b/v4l/versions.txt
index eb206b5..3c57c14 100644
--- a/v4l/versions.txt
+++ b/v4l/versions.txt
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ USB_STV06XX
VIDEO_TVP514X
# requires id_
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 05:28:19 Ant wrote:
> Andy Walls wrote:
> > Hermann,
> >
> > There is an FQ1216LME MK3 data sheet here:
> >
> > http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/datasheets/tuners/FQ1216LME%20Mk3.pdf
> >
> > Is it safe to assume that the MK5 is not very different from the MK3?
>
> I am no expert on
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 22:21:31 Martin Dauskardt wrote:
> I should add that the picture quality is with all tested tuner types
> worse than with my PVR250/350. I don't know if a PVR150 is in generally
> worse than a PVR250. I can't call it really noisy, but in german I would
> say the picture is a
Andy Walls wrote:
Hermann,
There is an FQ1216LME MK3 data sheet here:
http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/datasheets/tuners/FQ1216LME%20Mk3.pdf
Is it safe to assume that the MK5 is not very different from the MK3?
I am no expert on the subject, but I found this reference to the MK3 vs MK5:
http://ww
For video_register_device(), it return zero means register success.It would be
return zero
or a negative number (on failure),it would not return a positive number.so it
have better to
use this to check err:
int err = video_register_device(vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
if (err != 0)
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 22:03 -0400 schrieb Andy Walls:
> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 02:15 +0200, hermann pitton wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 22:21 +0200 schrieb Martin Dauskardt:
> > > I should add that the picture quality is with all tested tuner types
> > > worse
>
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 02:15 +0200, hermann pitton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 22:21 +0200 schrieb Martin Dauskardt:
> > I should add that the picture quality is with all tested tuner types worse
> > than with my PVR250/350. I don't know if a PVR150 is in generally worse
> > tha
Hi Andy,
Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 21:38 -0400 schrieb Andy Walls:
> Hi Martin,
>
> For some reason, I'm not getting any of your replies to the lists. (I'm
> getting Hermann's posts though)
that is something I have seen since the beginning of changing to vger
too and it is very annoying.
>
Hi Martin,
For some reason, I'm not getting any of your replies to the lists. (I'm
getting Hermann's posts though)
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 23:45 +0200, hermann pitton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 25.05.2009, 21:34 +0200 schrieb Martin Dauskardt:
> > > #define TUNER_PHILIPS_FQ1216ME 2
Found what I THINK to be the proper offset, with the help of the
"proper" firmware: 0x6298, length: 9674bytes. (atidtuxx.sys) I have a
copy set up on my system and appears to be working properly.. If anybody
would like to test, I can send them the file off-list. Again, this is
for the ATI HDT
Jonathan Isom wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Devin Heitmueller
wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jonathan Isom wrote:
Dvbstreamer supports atsc epg. That is what i use
Well, learn something new every day. I didn't realize dvbstreamer had
ATSC support.
Ye
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 22:21 +0200 schrieb Martin Dauskardt:
> I should add that the picture quality is with all tested tuner types worse
> than with my PVR250/350. I don't know if a PVR150 is in generally worse than
> a PVR250. I can't call it really noisy, but in german I would say t
Hi everybody,
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: [Linux-uvc-devel] Compilation error
Date: Tuesday 26 May 2009
From: Phil Lemelin
To: linux-uvc-de...@lists.berlios.de
Hi uvc-devel list,
I'm trying to get my usb camera to work ( 174f:8a34 Syntek ) on a older
system ( 2.6.18-6, de
(posting to proper mailing list as per linux-...@linuxtv.org's
auto-response)
I recently acquired an ATI HDTV Wonder PCI card from a friend of mine
and decided to test it out on my satellite TV transcoding server to also
get OTA channels. I am using a generic linux kernel version 2.6.29.2,
and
On Mon, 25 May 2009, David wrote:
> > No luck I'm afraid (although there now appear to be 2 timeouts, not
> > one). I'm going to follow up on the laptop and get a USB log.
> >
> USB log post-patch attached. Thanks for all the effort so far!
I think the idea of the patch was good, but the endpo
I should add that the picture quality is with all tested tuner types worse
than with my PVR250/350. I don't know if a PVR150 is in generally worse than
a PVR250. I can't call it really noisy, but in german I would say the picture
is a little bit "grobkörnig". It really needs a temporal filter se
Igor M. Liplianin wrote:
The card is working with external LNB power supply, for example, through the loop out from another
sat box. So, we need to know, which way to control LNB power on the board. Usually it is through
GPIO pins.
For example:
Pins 112 and 111 for GPIO0, GPIO1. Also GPIO15 is
Hello all,
I talked to Mauro offline about this issue and he indicated that it was
an area that could use some attention. So I have decided to take this
issue on and am looking for comments about how this should work.
Issue: The DVB and V4L interfaces are considered different devices from
a syste
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Devin Heitmueller
wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jonathan Isom wrote:
>> Dvbstreamer supports atsc epg. That is what i use
>
> Well, learn something new every day. I didn't realize dvbstreamer had
> ATSC support.
Yep. Don't confuse with dvbstream. S
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jonathan Isom wrote:
> Dvbstreamer supports atsc epg. That is what i use
Well, learn something new every day. I didn't realize dvbstreamer had
ATSC support.
Devin
--
Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs
http://www.kernellabs.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Tuesday, May 26, 2009, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Chris Capon wrote:
>> Hi:
>> I've installed an HVR-1600 card in a Debian system to receive ATSC
>> digital broadcasts here in Canada. Everything works great.
>>
>> scan /usr/share/dvb/atsc/us-ATSC-center-freque
Hi Patrick! Hi list!
This patch adds suspend/resume support to flexcop-pci driver.
I could only test this patch with the bare card, but without having a DVB-S
signal. I checked it with and without running szap (obviously getting no
lock).
It works fine here with suspend-to-disk on a tuxonice ke
Le Monday 25 May 2009 22:11:49 Dominique Dumont, vous avez écrit :
> I have some trouble with the initialisation of dvb_usb_nova_t_usb2: the
> firmware is loaded about 1 minute after the module is registered by
> usbcore:
Sorry, I forgot to mention my kernel version 2.6.29.3 (Debian/sid amd64
ker
On Tue, 26 May 2009 19:42:00 +0100, David wrote:
> I've been doing a bit of random rebooting (I don't really have time to
> do a full bisect), and can reproduce the usbmon panic on this machine
> back to 2.6.24.. so it certainly hasn't appeared that recently.
Actually that's good to know, thanks
Le Tuesday 26 May 2009 07:43:15 Tomer Barletz, vous avez écrit :
> Hi,
> When inserting a SCM/Viaccess CAM, I get the following message:
> dvb_ca adapter 0: DVB CAM did not respond :(
>
> According to this:
> http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/file/142fd6020df3/linux/Documentation/dvb/ci.
>txt this CAM
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Devin Heitmueller
wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Tim Mester wrote:
>> From my experience it seems that 2 in 0x2005 resets the 8522 demod.
>> All demod register setting appear to be lost after accessing any
>> registers in the 0x2xxx range (you really, j
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 02:32:45PM -0400, Michael Krufky wrote:
>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
>> > From: Samuel Ortiz
>> > To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>> >
>> > We're going to remove the FIRMWARE_NAME_MAX definition
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Tim Mester wrote:
> From my experience it seems that 2 in 0x2005 resets the 8522 demod.
> All demod register setting appear to be lost after accessing any
> registers in the 0x2xxx range (you really, just that bit needs to be
> set on a i2c bus access). I am a lit
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2009 13:25:55 +0100, David wrote:
>
>
> I suppose so. I misunderstood how this worked. I guessed that the
> DMA API debugging was the culprit because its introduction coincided
> with the recent onset of this oops.
>
> Although usbmon does essentially illega
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 02:32:45PM -0400, Michael Krufky wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > From: Samuel Ortiz
> > To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> >
> > We're going to remove the FIRMWARE_NAME_MAX definition in order to avoid any
> > firmware name length restriction.
>
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> From: Samuel Ortiz
> To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>
> We're going to remove the FIRMWARE_NAME_MAX definition in order to avoid any
> firmware name length restriction.
> This patch changes the dvb_usb_device_properties firmware field accordingly
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Devin Heitmueller
wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Frank Dischner
> wrote:
> > While I'm at it, I thought I'd go ahead and make a patch to remove the
> > top bits from the vsb table, but I've got a question about that. I
> > think the first four entries
Hi:
I've installed an HVR-1600 TV card in a Debian system to receive ATSC
digital broadcasts here in Canada. Everything works great.
scan /usr/share/dvb/atsc/us-ATSC-center-frequencies-8VSB > channels.conf
finds a complete list of broadcasters.
azap -c channels.conf -r "channel-name"
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Chris Capon wrote:
> Hi:
> I've installed an HVR-1600 card in a Debian system to receive ATSC
> digital broadcasts here in Canada. Everything works great.
>
> scan /usr/share/dvb/atsc/us-ATSC-center-frequencies-8VSB > channels.conf
>
> finds a complete list
This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for
the kernels and architectures in the list below.
Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb:
date:Tue May 26 19:00:03 CEST 2009
path:http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb
changeset: 11853:142fd6020df3
gcc version: gcc
Em Fri, 22 May 2009 17:55:54 +1000
Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
> On Fri, 22 May 2009 14:48:47 +0900 Paul Mundt wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:37:41AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > From: Randy Dunlap
> > >
> > > Build fails when CONFIG_I2C=n, so handle that case in the if block:
>
Hello, Antonio
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Antonio Beamud Montero
wrote:
> It would compile today's snapshot of v4l-dvb with an old kernel version (for
> example 2.6.16)? (or is better to upgrade the kernel?)
Not long time ago v4l-dvb community had discussions about dropping
support for ker
On 25 May 2009 22:50:39 Simon Kenyon wrote:
> Igor M. Liplianin wrote:
> > On 20 May 2009 16:44:22 Simon Kenyon wrote:
> >> mp3geek wrote:
> >>> Not even being detected in Linux 2.6.29.1, I have the modules "dm1105"
> >>> loaded, but since its not even being detected by linux..
> >>>
> >>> lspci -v
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2009 13:25:55 +0100, David wrote:
>
> > >> I wonder if CONFIG_HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG does it (enabled with a select
> > >> in arch/x86/Kconfig). Strange that it started happening now.
> > >>
> > > That is enabled. I'll switch it off and
It would compile today's snapshot of v4l-dvb with an old kernel version
(for example 2.6.16)? (or is better to upgrade the kernel?)
Trying to compile today's mercurial snapshot in a SuSE 10.1 (2.6.16-21),
give the next errors:
/root/v4l-dvb/v4l/bttv-i2c.c: In function 'init_bttv_i2c':
/root/v
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
>
> On 05/26/2009 02:08 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 May 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >
> > > First of all, which app are you using to test the cam ? And are you using
> > > that
> > > app in combination with libv4l ?
> >
> > xawtv
On 05/26/2009 02:08 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
First of all, which app are you using to test the cam ? And are you using that
app in combination with libv4l ?
xawtv, no, it doesn't use libv4l, but it works with the old
gspcav1-20071224. Ok, ma
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
> First of all, which app are you using to test the cam ? And are you using that
> app in combination with libv4l ?
xawtv, no, it doesn't use libv4l, but it works with the old
gspcav1-20071224. Ok, maybe it used a different v4l version, but I have
v4l1_
On 05/26/2009 01:44 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi all
I think it would be agood time now to get my Logitech QuickCam Messenger
camera working with the current gspca driver. It used to work with
gspcav1-20071224, here's dmesg output:
/tmp/gspcav1-20071224/gspca_core.c: USB GSPCA camera f
Hi All,
This is probably the last test release for the 0.6.x series,
the video processing code has been rewritten and works very
nicely now. Please give this release a thorough testing!
The software whitebalancing and gamma correction can make a
very positive difference on the image quality give
Hi all
I think it would be agood time now to get my Logitech QuickCam Messenger
camera working with the current gspca driver. It used to work with
gspcav1-20071224, here's dmesg output:
/tmp/gspcav1-20071224/gspca_core.c: USB GSPCA camera found.(ZC3XX)
/tmp/gspcav1-20071224/gspca_core.c: [spca5
Hi Trent,
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Trent Piepho wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
+ if (params->frequency >= 4800 && params->frequency <= 15400) \
+ bs = 0x09;
+ if (params->frequency >= 16100 && params->frequency <= 43900) \
+
Hi Mauro,
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Wed, 20 May 2009 11:27:18 +0200 (CEST)
Patrick Boettcher escreveu:
Hi Mauro,
please pull from my repository for hte following changesets:
Committed, thanks. Yet, I saw a few minor issues on one of your patch. Please
fix and su
48 matches
Mail list logo
