On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 10:55 +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
> Manu Abraham wrote:
> > I have been going through this thread with much interest to see
> > where it was going.
> >
> > In fact, what i found after reading the emails in this thread:
> >
> > People would like to see standardized Signal sta
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 20.03.2009, 16:38 +0100 schrieb ROASCIO Paolo:
> Hello, are there plans to extend multifrontend support to other cards, eg.
> flydvb trio?
>
> I'm trying to do so (feling hvr3000 code), but with no success :(
>
> In the saa7134-dvb.c code there is a FIXME about this topic
>
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 12:15 -0700, Timothy D. Lenz wrote:
> modprobe cx23885 card=10 debug =7 still cause panic.
>
> I searched in
> /usr/src/v4l/v4l-dvb/linux/drivers/media/video/cx23885/cx23885-core.c and the
> closest section to what you list looks
> like this:
>
> if ((pci_status & PCI_MS
Op zaterdag 21-03-2009 om 22:16 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Alain
Kalker:
Starting out from 'allmodconfig',
> > Pruning (deselecting) all principal modules (i.e. those that actually
> > provide modaliases) for devices that we don't want, and then pruning all
> > of their dependencies that have n
Op zaterdag 21-03-2009 om 22:11 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Alain
Kalker:
> Op donderdag 19-03-2009 om 15:43 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Trent
> Piepho:
> > On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:18:47 +0300
> > > Alexey Klimov wrote:
> > > over what we
Op donderdag 19-03-2009 om 15:43 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Trent
Piepho:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:18:47 +0300
> > Alexey Klimov wrote:
> > over what we currently have on our complex Kbuilding system.
> >
> > For the out-of-system building,
This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for
the kernels and architectures in the list below.
Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb:
date:Sat Mar 21 19:00:06 CET 2009
path:http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb
changeset: 11126:61d2e6e33e90
gcc version: gcc (
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 08:05:51 -0400
Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
> > Devin,
> >
> > Please, don't invert the things.
> >
> > I am the one that is trying to defend the need of keeping the backport,
> > while
> > most of you are trying
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 02:03 -0700, Timothy D. Lenz wrote:
> Not sure what you ment by "if you got the panic to stop by commenting out the
> call to the problem function?" You want me to comment
> something out in the driver and recompile v4l?
Yes. I sent two different e-mails. I'm soory if it
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Devin,
>
> Please, don't invert the things.
>
> I am the one that is trying to defend the need of keeping the backport, while
> most of you are trying to convince to me to just drop it, since developers
> will
> run the bleeding edg
Not sure what you ment by "if you got the panic to stop by commenting out the
call to the problem function?" You want me to comment
something out in the driver and recompile v4l? With debug=7 it still panics and
much of the call trace scrolled off and again,
nothing went to serial port so no way
On Saturday 21 March 2009 06:56:18 Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > Please note that the somewhat awkward i2c address lists are temporary.
>
> This should be mentioned in the patch description. No one in the future
> wondering why these address lists are here is g
12 matches
Mail list logo
