cx-24116 +scan-s2

2009-02-23 Thread hmd
hi all can anyone use scan-s2 with cx24116 demodulator saccessfully? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 06:04:48 Trent Piepho wrote: > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, David Ellingsworth wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > Optional question: > > > > Why can't we drop support for all but the latest kernel? > > > > > Why: > > > > As others have alread

Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc-camera: configure drivers with a default format on open

2009-02-23 Thread Magnus Damm
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Currently soc-camera doesn't set up any image format without an explicit > S_FMT. > It seems this should be supported, since, for example, capture-example.c from > v4l2-apps by default doesn't issue an S_FMT. This patch configures a

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread Trent Piepho
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, David Ellingsworth wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > Optional question: > > Why can't we drop support for all but the latest kernel? > > > > > Why: > > As others have already pointed out, it is a waste of time for > developers who volunteer thei

Re: PVR x50 corrupts ATSC 115 streams

2009-02-23 Thread pat-lkml
Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:48 PM, David Engel wrote: >> The BER isn't totally unreliable. Yes, when it's low, it does seem to >> be meaningless. However, when it's high, as in my recent attempts to >> try a 115 by itself, it indicates that nothing will work. > > Maybe

Re: [PATCH] sh-mobile-ceu-camera: set field to the value, configured at open()

2009-02-23 Thread morimoto . kuninori
Dear Guennadi > Ok, you're right again. But that's not the problem with my previous patch > this time, it's that one more patch was missing - this one. And this time > I even actually tested it - at least with the capture-example. I would > need an mplayer or gstreamer for migor... Testing vid

Re: [RFC] How to pass camera Orientation to userspace

2009-02-23 Thread kilgota
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Adam Baker wrote: On Monday 23 February 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:53:57 +0100 Hans Verkuil wrote: Hi Adam, Sorry for the late reply, it's been very busy. Me too. The interest in detecting if a driver provides this informnation is

Re: PVR x50 corrupts ATSC 115 streams

2009-02-23 Thread Andy Walls
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 14:10 -0600, David Engel wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 02:06:56PM -0500, Steven Toth wrote: > > David Engel wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 02:35:00PM -0500, CityK wrote: > >>> David Engel wrote: > I won't be able to try anything more until tomorrow evening. > > I thi

Re: running multiple DVB cards successfully.. what do I need to know?? (major and minor numbers??)

2009-02-23 Thread sonof...@iinet.net.au
Thanks Mike Is this likely to stop the "Incorrect Readback of kernel version issue as well?" cheers Allan On Mon Feb 23 17:57 , Michael Krufky sent: >On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:49 PM, sonof...@iinet.net.au >sonof...@iinet.net.au> wrote: >> Some of you may have read some of my posts about an

Re: PVR x50 corrupts ATSC 115 streams

2009-02-23 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:48 PM, David Engel wrote: > The BER isn't totally unreliable. Yes, when it's low, it does seem to > be meaningless. However, when it's high, as in my recent attempts to > try a 115 by itself, it indicates that nothing will work. Maybe I am missing something. Your last

Re: running multiple DVB cards successfully.. what do I need to know?? (major and minor numbers??)

2009-02-23 Thread Michael Krufky
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:49 PM, sonof...@iinet.net.au wrote: > Some of you may have read some of my posts about an "incorrect firmware > readback" > message appearing in my dmesg, shortly after a tuner was engaged. > > I have isolated this problem, but the workaround so far has not been pretty.

running multiple DVB cards successfully.. what do I need to know?? (major and minor numbers??)

2009-02-23 Thread sonof...@iinet.net.au
Hi All Some of you may have read some of my posts about an "incorrect firmware readback" message appearing in my dmesg, shortly after a tuner was engaged. I have isolated this problem, but the workaround so far has not been pretty. On a hunch I removed my Dvico Fusion HDTV lite card from t

Re: PVR x50 corrupts ATSC 115 streams

2009-02-23 Thread David Engel
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 05:03:28PM -0500, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Steven Toth wrote: > > I'm out of time. Someone else want to jump in and assist? > > > > - Steve > > Given David's last summary of results, it seems like the BER indicator > for that particular d

Re: [RFC] How to pass camera Orientation to userspace

2009-02-23 Thread Adam Baker
On Monday 23 February 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:53:57 +0100 > > Hans Verkuil wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > > > Sorry for the late reply, it's been very busy. > > Me too. > > > > 1) Reuse the existing HFLIP and VFLIP controls, marking them as > > > read-only Pros : No ch

Re: PVR x50 corrupts ATSC 115 streams

2009-02-23 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Steven Toth wrote: >>> Do you still see high BER and high UNC? >> >> I won't be able to try anything more until tomorrow evening. >> >> I think you're missing something, though, Steven. The "In every case" >> was in reference to "without an x50 installed and conne

Re: PVR x50 corrupts ATSC 115 streams

2009-02-23 Thread Steven Toth
Do you still see high BER and high UNC? I won't be able to try anything more until tomorrow evening. I think you're missing something, though, Steven. The "In every case" was in reference to "without an x50 installed and connected to cable". That includes the cases where there are no x50s inst

Re: PVR x50 corrupts ATSC 115 streams

2009-02-23 Thread David Engel
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 02:06:56PM -0500, Steven Toth wrote: > David Engel wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 02:35:00PM -0500, CityK wrote: >>> David Engel wrote: I'll start with what worked. ... [test results of BER and UNC under varying configurations ] ... >>> Steven Toth

[cron job] ERRORS: armv5 armv5-ixp armv5-omap2 i686 m32r mips powerpc64 x86_64 v4l-dvb build

2009-02-23 Thread Hans Verkuil
(This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for the kernels and architectures in the list below.) Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb: date:Mon Feb 23 19:00:03 CET 2009 path:http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb changeset: 10653:359d95e1d541 gcc version: gcc

Re: PVR x50 corrupts ATSC 115 streams

2009-02-23 Thread Steven Toth
David Engel wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 02:35:00PM -0500, CityK wrote: David Engel wrote: I'll start with what worked. ... [test results of BER and UNC under varying configurations ] ... Steven Toth wrote: I think CityK confirmed that the nxt2004 driver statistics are probably bogus so

Re: PVR x50 corrupts ATSC 115 streams

2009-02-23 Thread David Engel
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 02:35:00PM -0500, CityK wrote: > David Engel wrote: > > I'll start with what worked. > > > > ... [test results of BER and UNC under varying configurations ] ... > > > > Steven Toth wrote: > > I think CityK confirmed that the nxt2004 driver statistics are > > probably bog

Re: Question regarding detail in dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22 (related to Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22)

2009-02-23 Thread Hans Verkuil
> Hello Hans, > > Hans Verkuil schrieb: >> We still need to support kernels from 2.6.22 onwards. Although I think >> the >> minimum supported kernel is something that needs a regular sanity check, >> right now there are no technical reasons that I am aware of to go to >> something newer than 2.6.2

[PATCH] sh-mobile-ceu-camera: set field to the value, configured at open()

2009-02-23 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
For the case, that we have to capture with a default format, i.e., when the user doesn't call S_FMT, we have to use the field value according to the default, configured at open() time. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski --- On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, morimoto.kunin...@renesas.com wrote: > ov772x_tr

Question regarding detail in dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22 (related to Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22)

2009-02-23 Thread Tobias Stoeber
Hello Hans, Hans Verkuil schrieb: We still need to support kernels from 2.6.22 onwards. Although I think the minimum supported kernel is something that needs a regular sanity check, right now there are no technical reasons that I am aware of to go to something newer than 2.6.22. Whether we keep

Re: Haupauge Nova-T 500 2.6.28 regression dib0700

2009-02-23 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Janne Grunau wrote: > Hi, > > I have some difficulties with the Hauppauge Nova-T 500 and 2.6.28 kernels. > > Following USB errors appear with 2.6.28.4 every 100ms: > > Feb 15 02:46:03 golem [ 7720.876132] usb 2-1: events/3 timed out on ep1in > len=0/6 > Feb 15 02:

[PATCH] remove redundant memset after kzalloc

2009-02-23 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
Hi there! While having a look at the allocation of struct dvb_frontend in *_attach functions, I found some cases calling memset after kzalloc. This is redundant, and the attached patch removes these calls. I also changed one case calling kmalloc and memset to kzalloc. Signed-off-by: Matthias Sc

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread David Ellingsworth
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all, > > There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually > determine someone's opinion. > > So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me > with your yes/no answer and (optional but welc

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:26:57 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > I'm right now working on another way of allowing backport that will better > scale, and will allow developers to use -git, without losing backport for > users. I have an incomplete skeleton for the backport scripts, available at

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread Douglas Schilling Landgraf
Hello Hans, On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:15:01 +0100 Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all, > > There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to > actually determine someone's opinion. > > So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly > to me with your yes/no answer and

Twinhan 2033, Mantis

2009-02-23 Thread Henrik Beckman
Any CAM support on this board today or planned ? Are willing to try bleeding edge code and provide feedback. Card info, 25.180805] Mantis :00:07.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 [ 25.180843] Mantis :00:07.0: setting latency timer to 64 [ 25.180856] irq: 18, latency: 64 [

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Trent, > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Jean Delvare wrote: >> > There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to >> actually >> > determine someone's opinion. >> > >> > So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly >> to me >> > with your yes/no answer and (optional

Re: PULL request (once more)

2009-02-23 Thread Patrick Boettcher
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Patrick Boettcher wrote: Hi Mauro, can you please pull this very important bugfix patch from my repository (http://linuxtv.org/hg/~pb/v4l-dvb/) . - [PATCH] software IRQ watchdog for Flexcop B2C2 DVB PCI cards I added two more patches which can go to 2.6.29 safely, beca

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread Trent Piepho
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Jean Delvare wrote: > > There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually > > determine someone's opinion. > > > > So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me > > with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short ex

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Hans, > There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually > determine someone's opinion. > > So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me > with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short explanation to > your standpoint. It do

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:15:01 +0100 Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all, > > There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually > determine someone's opinion. > > So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me > with your yes/no answer and (optional b

Re: TT 3650

2009-02-23 Thread Jean-Francois Moine
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:34:39 +0100 "Andreas Kurz" wrote: > Concerning this card (TT 3650 CI) in combination with the > non-repo-driver (suggested below): which tuner should I use? Is there > a special one needed? Hi Andreas, By tuner, do you mean the program to watch TV? I use 'vlc' with a pla

Re: mercurial problems?

2009-02-23 Thread Hans Verkuil
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:58:13 +0100 > Hans Verkuil wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> When I try to push changes to my tree I get these errors: >> >> pushing to ssh://hverk...@linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-ng-ctrls >> searching for changes >> remote: ** unknown exception encountered, details follow >> rem

Re: mercurial problems?

2009-02-23 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:58:13 +0100 Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi, > > When I try to push changes to my tree I get these errors: > > pushing to ssh://hverk...@linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-ng-ctrls > searching for changes > remote: ** unknown exception encountered, details follow > remote: ** repo

Re: TT 3650

2009-02-23 Thread Andreas Kurz
Hi again! Concerning this card (TT 3650 CI) in combination with the non-repo-driver (suggested below): which tuner should I use? Is there a special one needed? Original-Nachricht > Datum: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:33:53 +0100 > Von: Jean-Francois Moine > An: "Andreas Kurz" > CC: li

Re: [RFC] How to pass camera Orientation to userspace

2009-02-23 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:34:08 +0100 Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Monday 23 February 2009 00:56:40 Trent Piepho wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > On Sunday 22 February 2009 23:54:42 Hans de Goede wrote: > > > > Trent Piepho wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wro

Re: [RFC] How to pass camera Orientation to userspace

2009-02-23 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:53:57 +0100 Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Sorry for the late reply, it's been very busy. Me too. > > 1) Reuse the existing HFLIP and VFLIP controls, marking them as read-only > > Pros : No change needed to videodev2.h > > Cons: It is confusing to have controls that

PULL request (once more)

2009-02-23 Thread Patrick Boettcher
Hi Mauro, can you please pull this very important bugfix patch from my repository (http://linuxtv.org/hg/~pb/v4l-dvb/) . - [PATCH] software IRQ watchdog for Flexcop B2C2 DVB PCI cards This one is high-priority and has to go to 2.6.29 for its release. In the meantime I rebuilt and cleaned up

Re: [PATCH] Add "Sony PlayTV" to dibcom driver

2009-02-23 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:32:36 -0500 CityK wrote: > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:04:13 -0500 CityK wrote: > >> I don't think the Patchwork tool picked it up, as I don't see it in the > >> queue :( > >> http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/ > >> > >> I'm w

Haupauge Nova-T 500 2.6.28 regression dib0700

2009-02-23 Thread Janne Grunau
Hi, I have some difficulties with the Hauppauge Nova-T 500 and 2.6.28 kernels. Following USB errors appear with 2.6.28.4 every 100ms: Feb 15 02:46:03 golem [ 7720.876132] usb 2-1: events/3 timed out on ep1in len=0/6 Feb 15 02:46:03 golem [ 7720.976039] usb 2-1: events/3 timed out on ep1in len=

Re: [PULL] http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-zoran

2009-02-23 Thread Jean Delvare
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:58:29 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi Mauro, > > Please pull from http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-zoran for the > following: > > - saa7115: don't access reg 0x87 if it is not present. > - saa7185: add colorbar support. > - saa7115: add querystd and g_input_stat

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread VDR User
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Should we drop support for kernels <2.6.22 in our v4l-dvb repository? > > _: Yes > _: No Yes. > Optional question: > > Why: The reasons already stated, those resources could be better used doing other things. Aside of that, of the devs/use

Re: [RFC] How to pass camera Orientation to userspace

2009-02-23 Thread Hans de Goede
Trent Piepho wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote: Trent Piepho wrote: On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote: Trent Piepho wrote: On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote: Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera having a gravity switch (usually nothing as advanced a