On Monday 23 February 2009 00:56:40 Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Sunday 22 February 2009 23:54:42 Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Trent Piepho wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > >> Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera havi
2009/2/22 Hans Verkuil :
> Hi all,
>
> There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
> determine someone's opinion.
>
> So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
> with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short explanation to
>
Dear Guennadi.
Now MigoR and AP325 board have ov772x camera.
However, the lens used is different.
And I have a specific good setting value
for the lens of AP325.
So, I would like to add new function for
specific lens value.
meybe like this.
Can I add it ?
-- board-ap325 ---
static
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:04:13 -0500 CityK wrote:
>> I don't think the Patchwork tool picked it up, as I don't see it in the
>> queue :(
>> http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/
>>
>> I'm wondering it the quotations in the subject line are enough to thr
Andy Walls wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 14:12 -0500, CityK wrote:
>
>
>> The V4L-DVB is lacking in strategic direction. Yesterday was the time
>> to adopt one; so lets pick up one today!
>>
>
> CityK,
>
> I see you've been reading (or channeling) my blathering:
>
> http://www.linuxtv.org
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:04:13 -0500
CityK wrote:
> I don't think the Patchwork tool picked it up, as I don't see it in the
> queue :(
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/
>
> I'm wondering it the quotations in the subject line are enough to throw
> the script off. Mauro, any i
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:43 PM, CityK wrote:
> Jonathan Isom wrote:
>> Hi
>> I was looking over my logs and I'm wondering is
>> "nxt200x: Timeout waiting for nxt2004 to init"
>> common
>
> No its not common
>
>> or is this womething I need to worry about. I got one shortly before a
>> lockup(No
Yes...
On Mon Feb 23 12:13 , hermann pitton sent:
>
>Am Sonntag, den 22.02.2009, 11:15 +0100 schrieb Hans Verkuil:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
>> determine someone's opinion.
>>
>> So here is a quick poll, please reply either to
Dear Guennadi
> Currently soc-camera doesn't set up any image format without an explicit
> S_FMT.
> It seems this should be supported, since, for example, capture-example.c from
> v4l2-apps by default doesn't issue an S_FMT. This patch configures a default
> image format on open().
(snip)
> Ok,
Am Sonntag, den 22.02.2009, 11:15 +0100 schrieb Hans Verkuil:
> Hi all,
>
> There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
> determine someone's opinion.
>
> So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
> with your yes/no answer and (opti
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Trent Piepho wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Trent Piepho wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera having a gravity switch
> (usually nothing as advanced
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Sunday 22 February 2009 23:54:42 Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Trent Piepho wrote:
> > > On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > >> Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera having a gravity
> > >> switch (usually nothing as advanced as a gyros
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 14:12 -0500, CityK wrote:
> The V4L-DVB is lacking in strategic direction. Yesterday was the time
> to adopt one; so lets pick up one today!
CityK,
I see you've been reading (or channeling) my blathering:
http://www.linuxtv.org/irc/v4l/index.php?date=2009-02-20
([19:42]
Hi Matthias,
Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> MFE patches added a variable "id" to struct dvb_frontend.
> This variable seems to be uninitialized for some drivers.
>
> The result is for my skystar2 card (using stv0299 frontend) it sometimes is 0
> as it should but sometimes it is a random value, so
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera having a gravity switch
(usually nothing as advanced as a gyroscope). Also the bits we are talking
about are in a stru
On Sunday 22 February 2009 23:54:42 Hans de Goede wrote:
> Trent Piepho wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera having a gravity
> >> switch (usually nothing as advanced as a gyroscope). Also the bits we
> >> are talking about are
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short explana
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Trent Piepho wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera having a gravity switch
> >> (usually nothing as advanced as a gyroscope). Also the bits we are talking
> >> about are in a struct whi
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera having a gravity switch
(usually nothing as advanced as a gyroscope). Also the bits we are talking
about are in a struct which communicates information one way, from the camera
to us
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
> determine someone's opinion.
>
> So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
> with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a s
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera having a gravity switch
> (usually nothing as advanced as a gyroscope). Also the bits we are talking
> about are in a struct which communicates information one way, from the camera
> to userspace, so there
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera having a gravity switch
(usually nothing as advanced as a gyroscope). Also the bits we are talking
about are in a struct which communicates information one way, from the camera
to userspace, so ther
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Tobias Stöber wrote:
Hi together,
following this dicussion for some time, let me just add my solely personal
view. I'll have to prepend that I'm only a user in terms of v4l-dvb, but do
for instance quite a lot support for Eee PC netbooks. So some comments here
in some
kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
Hans and Adam,
I am not sure how it fits into the above discussion, but perhaps it
is relevant to point out that flags can be toggled. Here is what I mean:
Supp
Amy Overmyer wrote:
>> Lastly, are there any other IC components on the back or front of the
>> PCB ? Can you provide pics (upload them to the wiki article)) ?
>>
>
> The back only has a couple components, probably for electrical, no ICs.
>
okay
> The
> front only has the cypress (100 pin
On Sunday 22 February 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
> We want to be able to differentiate between a cam which has its sensor
> mounted upside down, and a cam which can be pivotted and happens to be
> upside down at the moment, in case of any upside down mounted sensor, we
> will always want to compent
Riba Zoltán wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to get working this card under my Debian
> :(2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686 on i686)
>
> http://www.zoneminder.com/wiki/index.php/Image:4ch_DVR_card.jpg
>
> But it doesn't want...:
> dmesg:
>
> bttv: driver version 0.9.17 loaded
> bttv: using 8 buffers with 2080k (520 pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jean-Francois,
Please pull from my repository. It includes one critical fix which
needs to go in 2.6.29.
Best regards,
Erik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkmhv7wACgkQN7qBt+4UG0Er+ACgsTPdORJWoDxsffxBNhX
panagiotis takis_rs wrote:
> > panagiotis takis_rs wrote:
> > > Hey!!
> > >
> > > I have a problem with my tv card(pinnacle pctv 310i)
> > > I can see image but i have no sound.
> > > I have tried both tvtime and kdetv.
> > >
> > > I have found this http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=568528
>
Stephen Rowles wrote:
> Only sending this to linux-dvb as I'm not signed up to the media list, and
> I'll probably get myself blacklisted from any future help by saying this
> ;) but...
>
BANISHMENT for Rowles !!!
Just kidding. Thanks for the insightful reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
Jonathan Isom wrote:
> Hi
> I was looking over my logs and I'm wondering is
> "nxt200x: Timeout waiting for nxt2004 to init"
> common
No its not common
> or is this womething I need to worry about. I got one shortly before a
> lockup(No backtrace). Nothing was doing other than dvbstreamer sitt
Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> Btw. I also had a longer look at the firmeware page in wiki and removed that
> note about gentoo using hotplug-scripts as that is false since a long time.
> CityK you are right, I think most (if not all) current distributions use udev
> to create device nodes and upl
scholl...@arcor.de wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Nachricht
> Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
>
>
>> Yes this ebuild is there. But it is in some respect outdated, due to lack of
>>
>> maintaining. This ebuild fetches the original files get_dvb_firmware also
>> fetches and the runs get_firmware
I don't think the Patchwork tool picked it up, as I don't see it in the
queue :(
http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/
I'm wondering it the quotations in the subject line are enough to throw
the script off. Mauro, any ideas?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubsc
sonof...@iinet.net.au wrote:
> On Mon Feb 16 22:51 , "sonof...@iinet.net.au" sent:
>
>
>>> I have done alot more testing and have found that it seems to be only after
>>> mythtv has accessed the device where this problem beings begins...
>>>
>>>
>> Same result with the hg version update
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
Hans and Adam,
I am not sure how it fits into the above discussion, but perhaps it is
relevant to point out that flags can be toggled. Here is what I mean:
Suppose that we have two flags 01 and 10 (i.e
Any work in progress for CAM support on the 2033?
Currently using, http://mercurial.intuxication.org/hg/s2-liplianin but
I´ll switch to whatever has or will have CAM.
Card info,
25.180805] Mantis :00:07.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
[ 25.180843] Mantis :00:07.0: setting
David Engel wrote:
> I'll start with what worked.
>
> ... [test results of BER and UNC under varying configurations ] ...
>
Steven Toth wrote:
> I think CityK confirmed that the nxt2004 driver statistics are
> probably bogus so I doubt you're going to get your 115's running with
> BER 0 regardl
Hi there!
MFE patches added a variable "id" to struct dvb_frontend.
This variable seems to be uninitialized for some drivers.
The result is for my skystar2 card (using stv0299 frontend) it sometimes is 0
as it should but sometimes it is a random value, so I get this register
message:
DVB: regis
(This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for
the kernels and architectures in the list below.)
Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb:
date:Sun Feb 22 19:00:03 CET 2009
path:http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb
changeset: 10653:359d95e1d541
gcc version: gcc
Jean Delvare wrote:
>> quick question(s) - is this what I think it is -- a remote controller IC
>> ? If so, do you know who manufactures this IC? (I'm trying to connect
>> the dots with the problematic ks003 and ks007 ICs found on some cards)
>>
>
> The KS0127 is a video decoder, and it's m
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Should we drop support for kernels <2.6.22 in our v4l-dvb repository?
>
Yes
> Optional question:
>
> Why:
>
Its causing skilled developers to waste time that would be better served
in other areas. Because of that, these skilled volunteers are becoming
frustrated and
kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
Hans and Adam,
I am not sure how it fits into the above discussion, but perhaps it is
relevant to point out that flags can be toggled. Here is what I mean:
Suppose that we have two flags 01 and 10 (i.e. 2), and 01 signifies
VFLIP and 10 signifies
Hi all!
I have AVerMedia_AVerTV_Speedy_Hybrid_PCI-E its seems to recognized by sa716x
More info can be found here
http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/AVerMedia_AVerTV_Speedy_Hybrid_PCI-E =)
Its only recognzed by this driver actualy i cant get any signal from this
card.
--
Alexey 'Alexxy' Shve
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:32:08 -0500, CityK wrote:
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> > It took me several long weekends to get all this work done, but I think
> > it's
> > been very worthwhile.
> >
>
> Kudos! Well done -- another positive change!
I cant only second this. Yay!
> > Together these ca
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> It took me several long weekends to get all this work done, but I think it's
> been very worthwhile.
>
Kudos! Well done -- another positive change!
> Together these cards use the ... ks0127 i2c devices
quick question(s) - is this what I think it is -- a remote contro
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi Adam,
Sorry for the late reply, it's been very busy.
Same here :)
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 01:30:52 Adam Baker wrote:
(linux-omap included in distribution as lots of omap systems include
cameras so this could be re
Laurent Haond wrote:
> af9015_copy_firmware:
> af9015: command failed:2
> af9015: firmware copy to 2nd frontend failed, will disable it
> dvb-usb: no frontend was attached by 'AVerMedia A850'
>
>
>
> dvbscan fails with this error : Unable to query frontend status
> and sometimes (not every
Hi Mauro,
Please pull from http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-zoran for the
following:
- saa7115: don't access reg 0x87 if it is not present.
- saa7185: add colorbar support.
- saa7115: add querystd and g_input_status support for zoran.
- zoran: convert to video_ioctl2 and remove 'ready
Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~dougsland/v4l-dvb/ for the
> following:
>
> - v4l2-apps: Add parser for USB snoops captured from SniffUSB 2.0
It is not clear to me why this ended up in /v4l2-apps/test, as opposed
to /v4l2/util -- c
Since dvb-api doc is still outdated by six years...
The following patch changes dvbapi.pdf as following:
___
- change from twosided book format to singlesided book format.
* By doing so, the readability is improved and
HI Hans,
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Oldest supported openSUSE kernel is 2.6.22 (10.3). I don't know when the
> end-of-life due date is for this openSUSE release. It might not be too long
> from now. (I can't find a decent webpage with the openSUSE releases, does
> anyone have one?)
Here's a couple
Hello Mauro,
Added new patch.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:11:27 -0300
Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
> Mauro,
>
> Added new patch.
>
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:41:13 -0300
> Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
>
> > Hi Mauro,
> >
> > Please pull from http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~dougsland/em28xx f
Hi, thanks for your support Antti !
> Hello and thank you for information,
>
> According to your previous post, you are correct. I did one of the most
> typical mistake when adding new usb-id:s :) (didn't increase
> .num_device_descs).
>
> Laurent Haond wrote:
>> af9015_usb_probe: interface:0
>>
Hi together,
following this dicussion for some time, let me just add my solely
personal view. I'll have to prepend that I'm only a user in terms of
v4l-dvb, but do for instance quite a lot support for Eee PC netbooks. So
some comments here in some sense urged me to jump into this discussion.
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Sunday 22 February 2009 12:17:58 Hans de Goede wrote:
Agreed, but it still is something which should be avoided if possible,
implementing polling also means adding a lot of IMHO unneeded code on the
userspace side.
I would prefer to make the "realtime" pivotting sta
On Sunday 22 February 2009 12:17:58 Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> Cons: Would require polling to support the case of a camera being
> >> turned toward / away from the user while streaming.
> >
> > Polling applies only to the bits that tell the orientation of the
> > camera. See be
Hans Verkuil wrote:
...
This would basically mean making a snapshot of the v4l-dvb repository,
calling it v4l-dvb-old and relying on people to update it with fixes. I did
think about this myself but I thought it unlikely that the old tree would
see much work, if at all. It's what they are admi
Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi Adam,
Sorry for the late reply, it's been very busy.
Same here :)
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 01:30:52 Adam Baker wrote:
(linux-omap included in distribution as lots of omap systems include
cameras so this could be relevant there.)
Background
A number of the we
Hi,
When I try to push changes to my tree I get these errors:
pushing to ssh://hverk...@linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-ng-ctrls
searching for changes
remote: ** unknown exception encountered, details follow
remote: ** report bug details to http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts
remote: ** or merc
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short explanation to
your standpoint. It doesn't matter
Hi Trent,
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 05:58:10 -0800 (PST), Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Well, that's basically what Hans has been doing with
> > v4l2-i2c-drv-legacy.h for months now, isn't it? This is the easy part
> > (even though even this wasn't exactly trivial...
On Sunday 22 February 2009 00:47:46 Adam Baker wrote:
> On Saturday 21 February 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > The high rate of changes and new drivers means that keeping up the
> > backwards compatibility becomes an increasingly heavy burden.
> >
> > This leads to two questions:
> >
> > 1) Can we c
On Sunday 22 February 2009 02:15:51 kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
> >> Oldest supported Ubuntu kernel is 2.6.22 (7.10):
>
> This is a bit optimistic.
>
> Matter of fact, I just bought a brand new eeePC in January, on which Asus
> chose to install Xandros. The response to uname -r is (I put
64 matches
Mail list logo
