On 7/9/24 14:51, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/9/24 14:40, John Hubbard wrote:
On 7/9/24 1:34 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/4/24 01:24, John Hubbard wrote:
...>> Muhammad Usama Anjum (1):
selftests: x86: test_FISTTP: use fisttps instead of ambiguous fisttp
Usama and John,
I am seeing chec
On 6/12/24 02:17, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 6/12/24 1:32 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 6/9/24 23:41, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No
functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages.
Use kselftest_harness.h to
On 7/2/24 00:55, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
The python unittest is being used for executing tests. TAP output
cannot be added in the unittest framework. The python unittest is being
run from a script. Add the output TAP logs to the script. Add "#"
prefix to the python unittest output which will
On 7/2/24 04:12, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No
functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages.
The test has infitie loop to read the value of index_str. Break the loop
after successfully reading the value once
On 7/2/24 04:12, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No
functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages.
The test has infinite loop to read the value of status_str. Break the
loop after getting the value once and finish
On 7/2/24 04:17, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 6/10/24 10:19 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Adding Borislav, Dave and x86 mailing list:
Please review the series.
Kind reminder
Usama,
As I mentioned another TAP conversion patch from you patch if the
following command gives you TAP
On 7/9/24 19:59, Zhu Jun wrote:
The requested resources should be closed before return
in main(), otherwise resource leak will occur
Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun
How did you find this problem? Please give more details
on the tool used including the output from the tool.
---
Changes in v2:
- chec
On 7/9/24 20:16, Zhu Jun wrote:
Main function return value is int type, so add return
value in the end that this problem was discovered by reading the code
Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun
---
Changes in v2:
- modify commit info
tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c | 4 +++-
On 7/10/24 00:30, Zhu Jun wrote:
The opened file should be closed in main(), otherwise resource
leak will occur that this problem was discovered by reading code
Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun
---
tools/testing/selftests/dma/dma_map_benchmark.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t
On 7/9/24 20:11, Zhu Jun wrote:
This variable is never referenced in the code, just remove them
that this problem was discovered by reading the code
Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun
---
Changes in v2:
- modify commit info
tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c | 1 -
1 file c
On 7/10/24 00:57, Zhu Jun wrote:
The variable are never referenced in the code, just remove it
that this problem was discovered by reading code
Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun
---
tools/testing/selftests/dma/dma_map_benchmark.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftest
On 7/10/24 01:55, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 10/07/2024 00:43:09-0700, Zhu Jun wrote:
The opened file should be closed before exit, otherwise resource leak
will occur that this problem was discovered by code reading
The question is still why should it be closed before exit as it will be
close
On 7/10/24 01:33, Zhu Jun wrote:
From a good programming practice perspective, especially in more
complex programs, explicitly freeing allocated memory is a good habit.
The change looks good to me, however can you elaborate more on what
kind of leak your fixing here?
Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun
On 7/10/24 03:37, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
This patch brings just readability implements by using kselftests wrappers
instead of manual pass/fail test cases counting. It has been on mailing
list from several months now. Please can someone ack or nack?
Okay. I think I responded to your other
On 7/10/24 03:33, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Hi Shuah,
Can you take the patch as is or by removing following from this patch:
- if (geteuid() != 0)
+ if (geteuid())
As Aleksa mentioned, geteuid() != 0 is preferred.
On 7/2/24 12:02 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/1/24 2:1
On 7/1/24 02:33, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Adding missing maintainer and reviser.
On 5/20/24 9:37 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No
functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages.
Without using TAP messages
On 7/1/24 03:38, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
On Mon, 2024-07-01 at 13:36 +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Soft reminder
On 5/22/24 10:06 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No
functional change is intended other than the layout of outp
On 7/9/24 21:28, Zhu Jun wrote:
'%u' in format string requires 'unsigned int' in __wait_for_test()
but the argument type is 'signed int'.
Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun
---
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/s
On 7/10/24 07:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 07:29:53PM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
Log errors are the most widely used mechanism for reporting issues in
the kernel. When an error is logged using the device helpers, eg
dev_err(), it gets metadata attached that ide
On 7/10/24 02:58, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Hi Shuah,
Thank you for replying.
On 7/10/24 4:39 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/2/24 04:17, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 6/10/24 10:19 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Adding Borislav, Dave and x86 mailing list:
Please review the series
On 7/11/24 00:52, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/10/24 9:16 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/10/24 03:37, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
This patch brings just readability implements by using kselftests wrappers
instead of manual pass/fail test cases counting. It has been on mailing
list from several
On 7/10/24 19:42, Joseph, Jithu wrote:
Acked-by: Jithu Joseph
Applied to linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.11-rc1.
thanks,
-- Shuah
On 7/10/24 15:49, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/10/24 07:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 07:29:53PM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
Log errors are the most widely used mechanism for reporting issues in
the kernel. When an error is logged using the device helpers, eg
dev_err
On 7/11/24 15:44, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 01:53:37PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/10/24 15:49, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/10/24 07:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 07:29:53PM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
Log errors are the most widely
Hi Linus,
Please pull the following KUnit next update for Linux 6.11-rc1.
This KUnit next update for Linux 6.11-rc1 consists of:
-- adds vm_mmap() allocation resource manager
-- converts usercopy kselftest to KUnit
-- disables usercopy testing on !CONFIG_MMU
-- adds MODULE_DESCRIPTION() to core
Hi Linus,
Please pull the kselftest update for Linux 6.11-rc1.
This kselftest next update for Linux 6.11-rc1 consists of:
-- changes to resctrl test to cleanup resctrl_val() and
generalize it by removing test name specific handling
from the function.
-- several clang build failure fixes
On 7/12/24 01:30, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Use kselftest wrapper to mark tests pass/fail instead of manually
counting. This is needed to return correct exit status. This also
improves readability and mainability.
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
As mentioned earlier, include before and
On 7/12/24 01:30, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Return correct exit status, KSFT_SKIP if the pre-conditions aren't met.
Return KSFT_FAIL if error occurs. Use ksft_finished() which will
compmare the total planned tests with passed tests to return the exit
value.
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
On 7/12/24 02:46, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
In this series, 4 tests are being conformed to TAP.
Changes since v1:
- Correct the description of patches with what improvements they are
bringing and why they are required
Muhammad Usama Anjum (4):
selftests: x86: check_initial_reg_state: re
On 7/18/24 05:32, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Removes manual counting of pass and fail tests. This increases readability
of tests, but also improves maintainability of the tests. Print logs in
standard format (without [RUN], [OK] tags)
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
---
Changes since v1:
-
On 7/18/24 05:32, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Changes since v1:
- Correct the description of patches with what improvements they are
bringing and why they are required
Changes since v2:
- Update descriptions of patches and add output before/after
Muhammad Usama Anjum (4):
selftests: x86:
On 7/12/24 01:30, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Use kselftest wrapper to mark tests pass/fail instead of manually
counting.
You care combining two changes in the patch.
This is needed to return correct exit status. This also
improves readability and mainability.
Spelling - "mainability" - che
On 7/19/24 01:28, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/18/24 8:48 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/18/24 05:32, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Removes manual counting of pass and fail tests. This increases readability
of tests, but also improves maintainability of the tests. Print logs in
standard format
On 7/15/24 05:49, Dev Jain wrote:
On 6/30/24 20:48, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
I see nothing wrong, but perhaps this test can be simplified?
Feel free to ignore.
Say,
On 06/27, Dev Jain wrote:
+void handler_usr(int signo, siginfo_t *info, void *uc)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ /*
+ * Break out of i
On 7/21/24 10:37, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/21/24 9:24 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/19/24 9:40 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/12/24 01:30, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Use kselftest wrapper to mark tests pass/fail instead of manually
counting.
You care combining two changes in the
On 7/22/24 09:43, Laura Nao wrote:
Consider skipped tests in addition to passed tests when evaluating the
overall result of the test suite in the finished() helper.
Signed-off-by: Laura Nao
---
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
d
On 7/22/24 11:32, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/22/24 09:43, Laura Nao wrote:
Consider skipped tests in addition to passed tests when evaluating the
overall result of the test suite in the finished() helper.
Signed-off-by: Laura Nao
---
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py | 2 +-
1 file
On 7/22/24 22:30, Dev Jain wrote:
On 7/22/24 20:28, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/15/24 05:49, Dev Jain wrote:
On 6/30/24 20:48, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
I see nothing wrong, but perhaps this test can be simplified?
Feel free to ignore.
Say,
On 06/27, Dev Jain wrote:
+void handler_usr(int signo
On 7/22/24 09:43, Laura Nao wrote:
Consider skipped tests in addition to passed tests when evaluating the
overall result of the test suite in the finished() helper.
Signed-off-by: Laura Nao
---
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
d
On 7/24/24 00:26, Zhu Jun wrote:
'%u' in format string requires 'unsigned int' in __wait_for_test()
but the argument type is 'signed int' that this problem was discovered
by reading code.use macro WTERMSIG like those above usage to
fix the wrong format specifier.
Now the commit summary doesn't
On 7/25/24 05:08, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
The user test suite has only one test, test_user_copy which loads
test_user_copy module for testing. But test_user_copy module has already
been converted to kunit (see fixes). Hence remove the entire suite.
Fixes: cf6219ee889f ("usercopy: Convert tes
On 7/25/24 06:11, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
The strscpy test loads test_strscpy module for testing. But test_strscpy
was converted to Kunit (see fixes). Hence remove strscpy.
Fixes: 41eefc46a3a4 ("string: Convert strscpy() self-test to KUnit")
Remove fixes tag - this isn't a fix and we don't
On 7/24/24 20:34, Zhu Jun wrote:
The format specifier in fprintf is "%u", that "%u" should use
unsigned int type instead.the problem is discovered by reading code.
Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun
---
v1->v2:
modify commit info add how to find the problem in the log
v2->v3:
Seems this
On 7/25/24 05:06, Laura Nao wrote:
Add a new kselftest to detect and report slowdowns in key boot events. The
test uses ftrace to track timings for specific boot events and compares
these timestamps against reference values provided in YAML format.
The test includes the following files:
- `b
On 7/25/24 05:06, Laura Nao wrote:
Introduce a new kselftest to identify slowdowns in key boot events.
The test uses ftrace to track timings for specific boot events.
The kprobe_timestamps_to_yaml.py script can be run once to generate a
YAML file with the initial reference timestamps for these ev
On 7/24/24 21:57, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 16-07-24, 00:56, Shreeya Patel wrote:
Add RTC wakeup alarm for devices to resume after specific time interval.
This improvement in the test will help in enabling this test
in the CI systems and will eliminate the need of manual intervention
for resuming b
On 7/26/24 02:16, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/25/24 7:44 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/25/24 05:08, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
The user test suite has only one test, test_user_copy which loads
test_user_copy module for testing. But test_user_copy module has already
been converted to kunit
On 7/25/24 20:32, Zhu Jun wrote:
The format specifier in fprintf is "%u", that "%u" should use
unsigned int type instead.the problem is discovered by reading code.
Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun
---
v1->v2:
modify commit info add how to find the problem in the log
v2->v3:
Seems this
On 7/26/24 05:06, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Remove the test_bitmap as it has been converted to kunit test.
Care to give some commit information on this change?
This change will take the ability away to run bitmap tests during
boot - as it will now be dependent on kunit
Why are we making cha
On 7/26/24 05:06, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Rename module to bitmap_kunit and rename the configuration option
compliant with kunit framework.
Cc: k...@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
---
MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
lib/Kconfig.debug | 1
On 7/26/24 05:06, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
In this series, test_bitmap is being converted to kunit test. Multiple
patches will make the review process smooth.
- Patch-1: Convert the tests in lib/test_bitmap.c to kunit
- Patch-2: Rename the lib/test_bitmap.c to lib/bitmap_kunit.c and other
On 7/15/24 04:09, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Hi Kees and All,
There are several tests in kselftest subsystem which load modules to tests
the internals of the kernel. Most of these test modules are just loaded by
the kselftest, their status isn't read and reported to the user logs. Hence
they do
ugh LLVM
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan
thanks,
-- Shuah
On 7/29/24 13:26, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/28/24 04:09, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
The current support for LLVM and clang in nolibc and its testsuite is
very limited.
* Various architectures plain do not compile
* The user *has* to specify "-Os" otherwise the program crashes
* Cross-comp
On 7/29/24 08:52, Laura Nao wrote:
Hi Shuah,
On 7/23/24 18:17, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/22/24 09:43, Laura Nao wrote:
Consider skipped tests in addition to passed tests when evaluating the
overall result of the test suite in the finished() helper.
I am finally with you now. Can you please
On 7/29/24 02:15, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/27/24 11:10 PM, Yury Norov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 01:26:48PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/26/24 05:06, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
In this series, test_bitmap is being converted to kunit test. Multiple
patches will make the review
On 7/29/24 02:29, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/27/24 12:26 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/26/24 05:06, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
In this series, test_bitmap is being converted to kunit test. Multiple
patches will make the review process smooth.
- Patch-1: Convert the tests in lib
On 7/30/24 04:10, David Gow wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 22:09, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 7/29/24 1:07 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/27/24 10:35 PM, Yury Norov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 04:06:57PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Rename module to bitmap_kunit and rename the co
On 7/30/24 09:55, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/30/24 04:10, David Gow wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 22:09, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 7/29/24 1:07 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/27/24 10:35 PM, Yury Norov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 04:06:57PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Rename
On 5/29/24 19:27, Joseph Jang wrote:
In order to validate ITS-MSI hwirq entry in the /proc/interrupts, we
have created a shell script to check is there any duplicated ITS-MSI
hwirq entry.
Joseph Jang (1):
selftest: drivers: Add support its msi hwirq checking
tools/testing/selftests/drivers
On 7/25/24 08:44, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/25/24 05:08, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
The user test suite has only one test, test_user_copy which loads
test_user_copy module for testing. But test_user_copy module has already
been converted to kunit (see fixes). Hence remove the entire suite.
Fixes
On 7/25/24 06:11, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
The strscpy test loads test_strscpy module for testing. But test_strscpy
was converted to Kunit (see fixes). Hence remove strscpy.
Fixes: 41eefc46a3a4 ("string: Convert strscpy() self-test to KUnit")
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
---
Changes s
On 7/29/24 23:23, David Gow wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 03:35, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/15/24 04:09, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Hi Kees and All,
There are several tests in kselftest subsystem which load modules to tests
the internals of the kernel. Most of these test modules are just
On 7/29/24 01:55, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/27/24 12:35 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/15/24 04:09, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Hi Kees and All,
There are several tests in kselftest subsystem which load modules to tests
the internals of the kernel. Most of these test modules are just
On 7/30/24 21:06, David Gow wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 23:49, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/29/24 02:29, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/27/24 12:26 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/26/24 05:06, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
In this series, test_bitmap is being converted to kunit test. Multiple
On 7/31/24 07:39, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Don't print that 88 sub-tests are going to be executed, but then skip.
This is against TAP compliance. Instead check pre-requisites first
before printing total number of tests.
Does TAP clearly mention this?
Old non-tap compliant output:
TAP v
On 7/23/24 22:21, Chang Yu wrote:
Replace "not ... nor" in the error message with "neither ... nor".
Signed-off-by: Chang Yu
---
tools/testing/selftests/exec/execveat.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/exec/execveat.c
b/tools/testin
On 7/31/24 07:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Reminder
top post???
On 7/10/24 1:15 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
The python unittest module writes all its output to stderr, even when
the run is clean. Redirect its output logs to stdout.
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama
On 7/31/24 07:05, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/30/24 3:29 PM, Laura Nao wrote:
The Python finished() helper currently exits with KSFT_FAIL when there
are only passed and skipped tests. Fix the logic to exit with KSFT_PASS
instead, making it consistent with its C and bash counterparts
(ksft_f
On 7/30/24 23:13, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/31/24 7:33 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
On July 30, 2024 3:36:11 PM PDT, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/25/24 08:44, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/25/24 05:08, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
The user test suite has only one test, test_user_copy which loads
On 7/31/24 02:32, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/31/24 3:37 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/25/24 06:11, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
The strscpy test loads test_strscpy module for testing. But test_strscpy
was converted to Kunit (see fixes). Hence remove strscpy.
Fixes: 41eefc46a3a4 ("s
On 7/31/24 07:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Kind reminder
On 7/2/24 3:17 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Kind reminder
Top post ???
On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86.
Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patch
On 7/31/24 16:21, kernelci.org bot wrote:
kselftest/next kselftest-lib: 1 runs, 1 regressions (v6.11-rc1-6-g38cde27f74d8)
Regressions Summary
---
platform| arch | lab | compiler | defconfig
| regressions
---
On 7/31/24 12:32, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
The implementation is limited and only supports numeric arguments.
It would help to add more details on why this is needed especially
in the commit log.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh
---
Thomas Weißschuh (2):
tools/nolibc: add support for [
On 7/31/24 12:32, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
The implementation is limited and only supports numeric arguments.
I would like to see more information in here. Why is this needed
etc. etc.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh
---
tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h | 93 +++
On 7/30/24 04:35, Laura Nao wrote:
On 7/29/24 22:06, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/29/24 08:52, Laura Nao wrote:
Hi Shuah,
On 7/23/24 18:17, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/22/24 09:43, Laura Nao wrote:
Consider skipped tests in addition to passed tests when evaluating the
overall result of the test suite
On 7/24/24 15:40, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
Introduce a new test to identify regressions causing devices to go
missing on the system.
For each bus and class on the system the test checks the number of
devices present against a reference file, which needs to have been
generated by the program
On 7/23/24 04:28, Abdulrasaq Lawani wrote:
The acct() system call enables or disables process accounting.
If accounting is turned on, records for each terminating process
are appended to a specified filename as it terminates. An argument of NULL
causes accounting to be turned off.
This patch wil
On 8/1/24 02:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/31/24 9:57 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/31/24 07:39, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Don't print that 88 sub-tests are going to be executed, but then skip.
This is against TAP compliance. Instead check pre-requisites first
before printing
On 8/1/24 10:27, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 8/1/24 02:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/31/24 9:57 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/31/24 07:39, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Don't print that 88 sub-tests are going to be executed, but then skip.
This is against TAP compliance. Instead chec
On 8/1/24 03:29, Abdulrasaq Lawani wrote:
The acct() system call enables or disables process accounting.
If accounting is turned on, records for each terminating process
are appended to a specified filename as it terminates. An argument of NULL
causes accounting to be turned off.
This patch will
On 7/31/24 15:23, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:14:16PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/31/24 07:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Kind reminder
On 7/2/24 3:17 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Kind reminder
Top post ???
On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote
On 8/1/24 13:27, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/31/24 15:23, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:14:16PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/31/24 07:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Kind reminder
On 7/2/24 3:17 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Kind reminder
Top post ???
On 6/10/24 10:28
On 8/1/24 13:15, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 05:19:45PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/24/24 15:40, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
Introduce a new test to identify regressions causing devices to go
missing on the system.
For each bus and class on the system the test
On 8/1/24 15:03, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 02:13:05PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 8/1/24 13:15, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 05:19:45PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/24/24 15:40, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
Introduce a new test to
On 8/1/24 16:24, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Wed Jul 31, 2024 at 8:45 PM EEST, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/31/24 07:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Reminder
top post???
On 7/10/24 1:15 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
The python unittest module writes all its output to stderr, even when
the run
On 11/9/23 11:04, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 06:44:44PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2077 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
I'm curious how this happened, especially since this was sent with b4.
My system time was me
On 8/2/24 09:48, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
On 2024-07-31 17:01:09+, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/31/24 12:32, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
The implementation is limited and only supports numeric arguments.
I would like to see more information in here. Why is this needed
etc. etc.
Ack.
Signed-off
On 8/1/24 23:38, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 8/1/24 9:27 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 8/1/24 02:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/31/24 9:57 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/31/24 07:39, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Don't print that 88 sub-tests are going to be executed, but then skip.
Th
I started seeing the
following warning building with an older gcc:
posix_timers.c:250:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format
arguments [-Wformat-security]
250 | ksft_print_msg(errmsg);
| ^~
Fix this up by changing it to ksft_print_msg("%s", errmsg)
.
So fix our use of shifting negative values in the valid-adjtimex
test case to use multiply by (1<<16) to avoid this.
The patch also aligns the values a bit to make it look nicer.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: Stephen Boyd
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: Shuah Kh
On 4/9/24 14:39, Mark Brown wrote:
When the child exits during the clone3() selftest we use WEXITSTATUS() to
get the exit status from the process without first checking WIFEXITED() to
see if the result will be valid. This can lead to incorrect results, for
example if the child exits due to signal
On 4/9/24 14:40, Mark Brown wrote:
When logging an error from calling waitpid() on the child we print a
misleading error message saying that the error we report was returned by
the chilld. Fix this to say the error is from waitpid().
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
---
tools/testing/selftests/clone
‘long unsigned int’} [-Wformat=]
Reported-by: Shuah Khan
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
---
tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_set_tid.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_set_tid.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3_set_
uch as main(), so I did not
change the return type of these functions from 'int' to 'void' to
minimize the necessary changes for a backport (it is an existing issue
anyways).
I see there is another instance of this problem that will need to be
addressed in -next, introduced by
On 4/11/24 14:53, John Stultz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 1:45 PM Shuah Khan wrote:
On 4/10/24 17:26, John Stultz wrote:
After commit 6d029c25b71f ("selftests/timers/posix_timers:
Tried to apply this for linux-kselftest next with Nathan's patch.
I can't find this commit i
Hi Linus,
Please pull the following kselftest fixes update for Linux 6.9-rc5.
This kselftest fixes update for Linux 6.9-rc5 consists of a fix to
kselftest harness to prevent infinite loop triggered in an assert
in FIXTURE_TEARDOWN and a fix to a problem seen in being able to stop
subsystem-enabl
On 4/15/24 09:41, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 11:26:53AM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Let the compilers (clang) know that this function would just call
exit() and would never return. It is needed to avoid false positive
static analysis errors. All similar functions cal
On 4/15/24 09:32, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
The patches in this series make the ktap sh helper and the power_supply
selftest POSIX-compliant. Tested with bash, dash and busybox ash.
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
---
Nícolas F. R. A. Prado (2):
selftests: ktap_helpers: Make it
On 4/17/24 09:37, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
Commit f7d5bcd35d42 ("selftests: kselftest: Mark functions that
unconditionally call exit() as __noreturn") marked functions that call
exit() as __noreturn but it did not change the return type of these
functions from 'void' to 'int' like it should have
201 - 300 of 431 matches
Mail list logo
