On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 18:02 +0800, David Gow wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 23:20, wrote:
> >
> > From: Benjamin Berg
> >
> > The existing KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM macro requires a separate function
> > to
> > get the description. However, in a lot of cases
From: Benjamin Berg
Hi,
This patchset adds signal handling to nolibc. Initially, I would like to
use this for tests. But in the long run, the goal is to use nolibc for
the UML kernel itself. In both cases, signal handling will be needed.
Benjamin
Benjamin Berg (3):
tools/nolibc: show failed
From: Benjamin Berg
Add support for sigaction() and implement the normal sa_mask helpers.
On many architectures, linux/signal.h pulls in compatibility definitions
for the old sigaction syscall instead of rt_sigaction. However, the
kernel can be compiled without support for this compatibility
From: Benjamin Berg
The logic would not catch if the test process crashes and would
incorrectly report a "success" state. Fix this by looking for the final
"Total number of errors:" message and printing "failure" if it was not
seen.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg
From: Benjamin Berg
The FD_* macros are assuming a specific type for the bitset. Add new
macros that introspect the type of the passed variable in order to know
the size of the bitset. This way the same macros can be used for other
purposes.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg
---
tools/include
On Wed, 2025-07-09 at 23:21 +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2025-07-09 17:55:12+0200, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> (...)
>
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> > @@ -1270,6 +1270,72 @@ int test_nam
From: Benjamin Berg
The FD_* macros are assuming a specific type for the bitmask. Add new
macros that introspect the type of the passed variable in order to know
the size of the bitmask. This way the same macros can be used for other
purposes.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg
---
v2:
- Rename
From: Benjamin Berg
Add support for sigaction() and implement the normal sa_mask helpers.
On many architectures, linux/signal.h pulls in compatibility definitions
for the old sigaction syscall instead of rt_sigaction. However, the
kernel can be compiled without support for this compatibility
From: Benjamin Berg
Hi,
This patchset adds signal handling to nolibc. Initially, I would like to
use this for tests. But in the long run, the goal is to use nolibc for
the UML kernel itself. In both cases, signal handling will be needed.
v2 contains some bugfixes and has a better test coverage
From: Benjamin Berg
The expect non-zero macro was incorrect and never used. Fix its
definition.
---
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc
From: Benjamin Berg
Add new helpers to track multiple steps as bits in an integer. Store
each step in a bit and use the lowest bit to store whether all steps
occurred in the correct order and only once.
Use this for the constructor tests.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg
---
v2:
- Newly added
On Fri, 2025-07-11 at 07:40 +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2025-07-10 12:39:50+0200, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> > From: Benjamin Berg
> >
> > Add support for sigaction() and implement the normal sa_mask helpers.
> >
> > On many architectures, linu
Hi,
On Wed, 2025-07-02 at 00:04 +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> [SNIP]
> > --- a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-i386.h
> > +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-i386.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,19 @@
> > #include "compiler.h"
> > #include "crt.h"
> >
> > +/* Needed to get the correct struct sigaction definition
On Sun, 2025-07-13 at 17:50 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 05:02:27PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > On 2025-07-11 09:25:26+0200, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2025-07-11 at 07:40 +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > > On 2025-07-1
From: Benjamin Berg
In preparation to add tests that use it.
Note that some architectures do not have a usable linux/signal.h include
file. However, in those cases we can use asm-generic/signal.h instead.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg
---
Another attempt at signal handling for nolibc which
From: Benjamin Berg
The FD_* macros are assuming a specific type for the bitmask. Add new
macros that introspect the type of the passed variable in order to know
the size of the bitmask. This way the same macros can be used for other
purposes.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg
---
v2:
- Rename
From: Benjamin Berg
The expect non-zero macro was incorrect and never used. Fix its
definition.
Fixes: 362aecb2d8cfa ("selftests/nolibc: add basic infrastructure to ease
creation of nolibc tests")
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg
---
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 4 ++
From: Benjamin Berg
Add support for sigaction() using the rt_sigaction syscall and implement
the normal sa_mask helpers.
For the uapi definitions, everything is copied into nolibc. This avoids
issues with kernel architecture headers that are not usable with the
rt_sigaction syscall.
Signed-off
From: Benjamin Berg
Hi,
This patchset adds signal handling to nolibc. Initially, I would like to
use this for tests. But in the long run, the goal is to use nolibc for
the UML kernel itself. In both cases, signal handling will be needed.
With v3 everything is now included in nolibc instead of
From: Benjamin Berg
The constructor order is not (and should not) be tested. Remove the
comment.
Fixes: a782d45c867c ("selftests/nolibc: stop testing constructor order")
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg
---
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletio
20 matches
Mail list logo
