There is a 'malloc' call in config_name function, which can
be unsuccessful. This patch will add the malloc failure checking
to avoid possible null dereference and give more information
about test fail reasons.
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 1 +
1 fil
There is a 'malloc' call in test_vmx_nested_state function, which can
be unsuccessful. This patch will add the malloc failure checking
to avoid possible null dereference and give more information
about test fail reasons.
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_set_ne
On Mon, 2024-04-22 at 15:02 -0700, Chen, Zide wrote:
>
>
> On 4/20/2024 9:03 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 16:54 -0700, Chen, Zide wrote:
> > >
> > > However, the selftest hangs:
> > >
> > > [Apr19 16:15] kselftest: Running tests in kvm
> > > [Apr19 16:16] rcu: INFO: rcu_
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 22:11, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:03 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 10:25:02AM -0300, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
> > > If the device register fails, free the allocated memory before
> > > returning.
> > >
> >
There is a 'malloc' call, which can be unsuccessful.
This patch will add the malloc failure checking
to avoid possible null dereference and give more information
about test fail reasons.
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan
---
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/tags_test.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 inse
On 22/04/2024 10:33, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 19.04.24 09:43, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> Previously soft-dirty was unconditionally exiting with success, even if
>> one of it's testcases failed. Let's fix that so that failure can be
>> reported to automated systems properly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ry
On 4/23/24 1:21 PM, Kunwu Chan wrote:
> There is a 'malloc' call, which can be unsuccessful.
> This patch will add the malloc failure checking
> to avoid possible null dereference and give more information
> about test fail reasons.
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
>
> Signed-off-by: Kunw
On 4/23/24 1:24 PM, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 22/04/2024 10:33, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 19.04.24 09:43, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>> Previously soft-dirty was unconditionally exiting with success, even if
>>> one of it's testcases failed. Let's fix that so that failure can be
>>> reported to autom
On 19/04/2024 18:12, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 19.04.24 18:30, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:45:14AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 19.04.24 10:33, Shivansh Vij wrote:
> On 19/04/2024 08:43, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This series adds uffd
On 4/23/24 12:39 PM, Kunwu Chan wrote:
> There is a 'malloc' call in test_vmx_nested_state function, which can
> be unsuccessful. This patch will add the malloc failure checking
> to avoid possible null dereference and give more information
> about test fail reasons.
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usa
On 4/23/24 12:37 PM, Kunwu Chan wrote:
> There is a 'malloc' call in config_name function, which can
> be unsuccessful. This patch will add the malloc failure checking
> to avoid possible null dereference and give more information
> about test fail reasons.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan
LGTM
Rev
On 4/22/24 10:21 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:37:13PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
>> This series introduces the selftests/arm directory, which tests 32 and 64-bit
>> kernel compatibility with 32-bit ELFs running on the Aarch platform.
>> The need for this bucket of tests is that 3
On 4/20/24 8:17 PM, Atish Patra wrote:
> The SBI definitions will continue to grow. Move the sbi related
> definitions to its own header file from processor.h
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
> ---
On 4/20/24 8:17 PM, Atish Patra wrote:
> __vcpu_has_ext can check both SBI and ISA extensions when the first
> argument is properly converted to SBI/ISA extension IDs. Introduce
> two helper functions to make life easier for developers so they
> don't have to worry about the conversions.
>
> Repla
On 4/20/24 8:17 PM, Atish Patra wrote:
> The KVM RISC-V allows Sscofpmf extension for Guest/VM so let us
> add this extension to get-reg-list test.
>
> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
> ---
> tools/testi
On 4/20/24 8:17 PM, Atish Patra wrote:
> The SBI PMU extension definition is required for upcoming SBI PMU
> selftests.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones
> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv
On 4/20/24 8:17 PM, Atish Patra wrote:
> This test implements basic sanity test and cycle/instret event
> counting tests.
>
> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
On 4/20/24 8:17 PM, Atish Patra wrote:
> Verify PMU snapshot functionality by setting up the shared memory
> correctly and reading the counter values from the shared memory
> instead of the CSR.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones
> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra
LGTM
Reviewed-
On 4/20/24 8:17 PM, Atish Patra wrote:
> Add a test for verifying overflow interrupt. Currently, it relies on
> overflow support on cycle/instret events. This test works for cycle/
> instret events which support sampling via hpmcounters on the platform.
> There are no ISA extensions to detect if a
…
> This patch will add the malloc failure checking
…
* Please use a corresponding imperative wording for the change description.
* Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” accordingly?
Regards,
Markus
On 4/20/24 8:17 PM, Atish Patra wrote:
> SBI PMU test comprises of multiple tests and user may want to run
> only a subset depending on the platform. The most common case would
> be to run all to validate all the tests. However, some platform may
> not support all events or all ISA extensions.
>
>
The NULL dereference tests in kunit_fault deliberately trigger a kernel
BUG(), and therefore print the associated stack trace, even when the
test passes. This is both annoying (as it bloats the test output), and
can confuse some test harnesses, which assume any BUG() is a failure.
Allow these test
From: Geliang Tang
v5:
- add a new patch "Check recv lengths in test_sockmap" instead of using
"continue" in msg_loop.
v4:
- address Martin's comments for v3. (thanks.)
- add Yonghong's "Acked-by" tags. (thanks.)
- update subject-prefix from "bpf-next" to "bpf".
Patch 1, v3 of "selftests
From: Geliang Tang
The values of recv and recvp in msg_loop may be negative, so it's necessary
to check if they are positive before using them.
Fixes: 16962b2404ac ("bpf: sockmap, add selftests")
Fixes: 753fb2ee0934 ("bpf: sockmap, add msg_peek tests to test_sockmap")
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang
From: Geliang Tang
Incorrect arguments are passed to fcntl() in test_sockmap.c when invoking
it to set file status flags. If O_NONBLOCK is used as 2nd argument and
passed into fcntl, -EINVAL will be returned (See do_fcntl() in fs/fcntl.c).
The correct approach is to use F_SETFL as 2nd argument, a
From: Geliang Tang
This patchset uses more network helpers in test_sock_addr.c, but
first of all, patch 2 is needed to make network_helpers.c independent
of test_progs.c. Then network_helpers.h can be included into
test_sock_addr.c without compile errors.
Patch 1 and patch 2 address Martin's com
From: Geliang Tang
ASSERT helpers defined in test_progs.h shouldn't be used in public
functions like open_netns() and close_netns(). Since they depend on
test__fail() which defined in test_progs.c. Public functions may be
used not only in test_progs.c, but in other tests like test_sock_addr.c
in
From: Geliang Tang
As Martin mentioned in review comment, there is an existing bug that
orig_netns_fd will be leaked in the later "goto fail;" case after
open("/proc/self/ns/net") in open_netns() in network_helpers.c. This
patch adds "close(token->orig_netns_fd);" before "free(token);" to
fix it.
From: Geliang Tang
Include network_helpers.h in test_sock_addr.c, use the newly added public
helper start_server_addr() instead of the local defined function
start_server(). This can avoid duplicate code.
In order to use functions defined in network_helpers.c in test_sock_addr.c,
Makefile needs
From: Geliang Tang
This patch uses public network helper connect_to_addr() exported in
network_helpers.h instead of the local defined function connect_to_server()
in test_sock_addr.c. This can avoid duplicate code.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c |
From: Geliang Tang
This patch uses public helper make_sockaddr() exported in network_helpers.h
instead of the local defined function mk_sockaddr() in test_sock_addr.c.
This can avoid duplicate code.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c | 64 +
Superseded.
v2 has just been sent out.
Thanks,
-Geliang
On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 19:55 +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang
>
> This patchset uses more network helpers in test_sock_addr.c, but
> first of all, patch 2 is needed to make network_helpers.c independent
> of test_progs.c.
…
> This patch will add the malloc failure checking
…
* Please use a corresponding imperative wording for the change description.
* Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” accordingly?
…
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ void test_vmx_neste
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 02:03:29PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
...
> > + pr_info("Usage: %s [-h] [-d ]\n", name);
> A little weird that we have pr_info named helper to print logs when it is a
> userspace application, not kernel code. I'll check it in the source who
> added it to the KVM te
…
> This patch will add the malloc failure checking
…
* Please use a corresponding imperative wording for the change description.
* Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” accordingly?
…
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ static const char *config_name(struct v
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 05:08:06PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> The NULL dereference tests in kunit_fault deliberately trigger a kernel
> BUG(), and therefore print the associated stack trace, even when the
> test passes. This is both annoying (as it bloats the test output), and
> can confuse some tes
Add support for (yet again) more RVA23U64 missing extensions. Add
support for Zcmop, Zca, Zcf, Zcd and Zcb extensions isa string parsing,
hwprobe and kvm support. Zce, Zcmt and Zcmp extensions have been left
out since they target microcontrollers/embedded CPUs and are not needed
by RVA23U64.
Since
Add description for Zca, Zcf, Zcd and Zcb extensions which are part the
Zc* standard extensions for code size reduction. Additional validation
rules are added since Zcb depends on Zca, Zcf, depends on Zca and F, Zcd
depends on Zca and D and finally, Zcf can not be present on rv64.
Signed-off-by: C
Since a few extensions (Zicbom/Zicboz) already needs validation and
future ones will need it as well (Zc*) add a validate() callback to
struct riscv_isa_ext_data. This require to rework the way extensions are
parsed and split it in two phases. First phase is isa string or isa
extension list parsing
The Zc* standard extension for code reduction introduces new extensions.
This patch adds support for Zca, Zcf, Zcd and Zcb. Zce, Zcmt and Zcmp
are left out of this patch since they are targeting microcontrollers/
embedded CPUs instead of application processors.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger
---
a
Export Zca, Zcf, Zcd and Zcb ISA extension through hwprobe.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger
---
Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 20
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h | 4
arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 4
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff
Extend the KVM ISA extension ONE_REG interface to allow KVM user space
to detect and enable Zca, Zcf, Zcd and Zcb extensions for Guest/VM.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel
Acked-by: Anup Patel
---
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 4
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c
The KVM RISC-V allows Zca, Zcf, Zcd and Zcb extensions for Guest/VM so
add these extensions to get-reg-list test.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel
Acked-by: Anup Patel
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c | 16
1 file changed, 16 insertions(
Add parsing for Zcmop ISA extension which was ratified in commit
b854a709c00 ("Zcmop is ratified/1.0") of the riscv-isa-manual.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 1 +
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/i
Export Zcmop ISA extension through hwprobe.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger
---
Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 4
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h | 1 +
arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.r
Extend the KVM ISA extension ONE_REG interface to allow KVM user space
to detect and enable Zcmop extension for Guest/VM.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel
Acked-by: Anup Patel
---
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c | 2 ++
2 files cha
The KVM RISC-V allows Zcmop extension for Guest/VM so add this
extension to get-reg-list test.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel
Acked-by: Anup Patel
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/se
Add description for the Zcmop (Compressed May-Be-Operations) ISA
extension which was ratified in commit c732a4f39a4 ("Zcmop is
ratified/1.0") of the riscv-isa-manual.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger
Acked-by: Conor Dooley
---
.../devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml| 12
Log errors are the most widely used mechanism for reporting issues in
the kernel. When an error is logged using the device helpers, eg
dev_err(), it gets metadata attached that identifies the subsystem and
device where the message is coming from. This series makes use of that
metadata in a new test
Move the discoverable devices test to a subdirectory to allow other
related tests to be added to the devices directory.
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
---
tools/testing/selftests/Makefile| 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/devices/{ => probe}/Makefile
Move the ksft python module, which provides generic helpers for
kselftests, to a common directory so it can be more easily shared
between different tests.
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
---
tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/d
Log errors are the most widely used mechanism for reporting issues in
the kernel. When an error is logged using the device helpers, eg
dev_err(), it gets metadata attached that identifies the subsystem and
device where the message is coming from. Introduce a new test that makes
use of that metadata
+others
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > This patch will add the malloc failure checking
> …
>
> * Please use a corresponding imperative wording for the change description.
>
> * Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” accordingly?
Nah, don't bother with Fixes. OOM will cause
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:23:54 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Add test managed wrappers for of_overlay_apply() that automatically
> removes the overlay when the test is finished. This API is intended for
> use by KUnit tests that test code which relies on 'struct device_node's
> and of_*() APIs.
>
>
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:23:57 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Test the KUnit test managed overlay APIs. Confirm that platform devices
> are created and destroyed properly. This provides us confidence that the
> test managed APIs work correctly and can be relied upon to provide tests
> with fake platf
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 07:56:01AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> +others
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > …
> > > This patch will add the malloc failure checking
> > …
> >
> > * Please use a corresponding imperative wording for the change description.
> >
> > * Would you
Hi,
I've been working with colleagues at Collabora to improve the testing
quality overall for kselftests since several months. We had identified
following key points to improve:
* Make non-TAP conformant tests, TAP conformant to catch the bugs/failures
in the CI and non-CI environment. Without cle
+158,7 @@ test_arch() {
exit 1
esac
printf '%-15s' "$arch:"
- swallow_output "${MAKE[@]}" "$test_target" V=1
+ swallow_output "${MAKE[@]}" CFLAGS_EXTRA="$CFLAGS_EXTRA" "$test_target"
V=1
cp run.out run.out."${arch}"
"${MAKE[@]}" report | grep passed
}
---
base-commit: 0adab2b6b7336fb6ee3c6456a432dad3b1d25647
change-id: 20240423-nolibc-werror-cde7b371a2ed
Best regards,
--
Thomas Weißschuh
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:32:48PM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> Add parsing for Zimop ISA extension which was ratified in commit
> 58220614a5f of the riscv-isa-manual.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 1 +
> arch/riscv/kernel
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 05:08:06PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> The NULL dereference tests in kunit_fault deliberately trigger a kernel
> BUG(), and therefore print the associated stack trace, even when the
> test passes. This is both annoying (as it bloats the test output), and
> can confuse some tes
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski :
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:35:38 -0700 you wrote:
> I was writing a test for page pool which depended on qstats,
> and got tired of having to filter dumps in user space.
> Add support for dumping stats for a single netde
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski :
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:52:30 -0700 you wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Implement support for tests which require access to a remote system /
> endpoint which can generate traffic.
> This series concludes the "groundwork" for upstr
Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Implement support for tests which require access to a remote system /
> > endpoint which can generate traffic.
> > This series concludes the "groundwork" for upstream driver tests.
> >
> > I wanted to support the three models which c
On 4/23/2024 12:49 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> If I restored the KVM_REQ_GLOBAL_CLOCK_UPDATE request from
>> kvm_arch_vcpu_load(), the selftest works for me, and I ran the test for
>> 1000+ iterations, w/ or w/o TSC scaling, the TEST_ASSERT(delta_corrected
>> <= ±1) never got hit. This is awe
Use KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER macro to define the 'kfree' and
'string_stream_destroy' wrappers for kunit_add_action.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov
---
lib/kunit/string-stream-test.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/string-stream-test.c b/l
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 07:56:01AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > +others
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > …
> > > > This patch will add the malloc failure checking
> > > …
> > >
> > > * Please use a corresponding imperat
From: Jeff Xu
This is followup patch on discussion happened during mseal v10 discussion [1]
Add branch perdiction hint to mseal code.
Please apply on top of mseal v10 patch
(which already in mm-unstable)
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cajucfpflwjg4n7wppt+u9vc4xhole_bppz0tdkf7w45hgky...@mail
From: Jeff Xu
It is unlikely that application calls mm syscall, such as mprotect,
on already sealed mappings, adding branch prediction hint.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu
Suggested-by: Pedro Falcato
---
mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
mm/mmap.c | 4 ++--
mm/mprotect.c | 2 +-
mm/mremap.c | 4 ++--
mm/ms
Hey All,
>On 19/04/2024 18:12, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 19.04.24 18:30, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:45:14AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 19.04.24 10:33, Shivansh Vij wrote:
>> On 19/04/2024 08:43, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Thi
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 9:06 AM Samuel Holland
wrote:
>
> Hi Atish,
>
> On 2024-04-20 10:17 AM, Atish Patra wrote:
> > SBI v2.0 SBI introduced PMU snapshot feature which adds the following
> > features.
> >
> > 1. Read counter values directly from the shared memory instead of
> > csr read.
> > 2.
We further recently added a new UFFD_FEATURE_WP_ASYNC feature as part of
[2], because getting soft-dirty return reliable results in some cases turned
out rather hard to fix.
But it sounds like the current soft-dirty semantic is sufficient for CRIU on
other arches? If I understood correctly f
Shivansh, do you speak for CRIU? Are you able to comment on whether CRIU
supports checkpointing an app that uses uffd?
I do not speak for CRIU - I'm just a user (and hopefully a future contributor),
but not a maintainer or owner. I can however comment on whether CRIU supports
checkpointing an
On 23 April 2024 18:59:21 BST, "Chen, Zide" wrote:
>
>
>On 4/23/2024 12:49 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>> If I restored the KVM_REQ_GLOBAL_CLOCK_UPDATE request from
>>> kvm_arch_vcpu_load(), the selftest works for me, and I ran the test for
>>> 1000+ iterations, w/ or w/o TSC scaling, the TEST_ASS
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 5:08 AM David Gow wrote:
>
> The NULL dereference tests in kunit_fault deliberately trigger a kernel
> BUG(), and therefore print the associated stack trace, even when the
> test passes. This is both annoying (as it bloats the test output), and
> can confuse some test harne
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 2:27 PM Ivan Orlov wrote:
>
> Use KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER macro to define the 'kfree' and
> 'string_stream_destroy' wrappers for kunit_add_action.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov
Hello!
This looks like a good use of the macro. Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar
Thanks!
-
On 4/20/24 1:33 AM, Xu Kuohai wrote:
On 4/20/2024 7:00 AM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 20:27 +0800, Xu Kuohai wrote:
From: Xu Kuohai
With lsm return value check, the no-alu32 version
test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts
is rejected by the verifier, and the log says:
0: R1=c
E_TEST(chdir_dot); EXPECT_SYSZR(1, chdir("."));
break;
CASE_TEST(chdir_blah);EXPECT_SYSER(1, chdir("/blah"),
-1, ENOENT); break;
---
base-commit: 0adab2b6b7336fb6ee3c6456a432dad3b1d25647
change-id: 20240423-nolibc-musl-brk-7784add29801
Best regards,
--
Thomas Weißschuh
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024, Peter Gonda wrote:
> Move the GHCB definitions from svm.h to the tools/ copy. This allows the
> SEV-ES selftest to use GHCBs which are required for non-trival VMs to
> paravirtualize NonAutomaticExits (NAEs) when SEV-ES is enabled. GHCB
> getters/setters have a warning with ad
This test maps a ring-buffer and validate the meta-page after reset and
after emitting few events.
Cc: Shuah Khan
Cc: Shuah Khan
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ring-buffer/.gitignore
b/t
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024, Peter Gonda wrote:
> Modifies ucall handling for SEV-ES VMs.
Please follow the preferred changelog style as described in
Documentation/process/maintainer-kvm-x86.rst
> Instead of using an out instruction and storing the ucall pointer in RDI,
> SEV-ES guests use a outsb VMGE
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 02:27, Ivan Orlov wrote:
>
> Use KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER macro to define the 'kfree' and
> 'string_stream_destroy' wrappers for kunit_add_action.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov
> ---
Acked-by: David Gow
Thanks,
-- David
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Si
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024, Peter Gonda wrote:
> Add GHCB management functionality similar to the ucall management.
> Allows for selftest vCPUs to acquire GHCBs for their usage.
Do we actually need a dedicated pool of GHCBs? The conundrum with ucalls is
that
we have no place in the guest to store the
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 13:57:45 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Only possible non-obvious observation is that some kselftests expect
> as root, and the ssh remote logic extends that to expecting ssh
> root access to the remote host.
>
> Would it make sense to explicitly add sudo for all privileged
>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 01:55:07PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> On 4/22/24 10:21 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Isn't this going to be difficult to maintain if we have two divergent copies
> > of the same stuff? From a very quick skim, a bunch of the signals stuff is
> > idential to what we ha
The "malloc" call may not be successful.Add the malloc
failure checking to avoid possible null dereference.
Kunwu Chan (4):
selftests/bpf: Add some null pointer checks
selftests/bpf/sockopt: Add a null pointer check for the run_test
selftests/bpf: Add a null pointer check for the load_btf_s
There is a 'malloc' call, which can be unsuccessful.
This patch will add the malloc failure checking
to avoid possible null dereference.
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/t
There is a 'malloc' call, which can be unsuccessful.
Add the malloc failure checking to avoid possible null
dereference and give more information
about test fail reasons.
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
d
There is a 'malloc' call, which can be unsuccessful.
Add the malloc failure checking to avoid possible null
dereference.
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
b/
There is a 'malloc' call, which can be unsuccessful.
Add the malloc failure checking to avoid possible null
dereference.
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tp_attach_query.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_
On 4/24/2024 5:55 AM, Yonghong Song wrote:
On 4/20/24 1:33 AM, Xu Kuohai wrote:
On 4/20/2024 7:00 AM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 20:27 +0800, Xu Kuohai wrote:
From: Xu Kuohai
With lsm return value check, the no-alu32 version test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts
is rejected by th
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 12:15:33AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On musl calls to brk() and sbrk() always fail with ENOMEM.
> Detect this and skip the tests on musl.
>
> Tested on glibc 2.39 and musl 1.2.5 in addition to nolibc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh
> ---
> tools/testing/selft
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 2:09 AM Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>
>
> -static void htab_map_free_timers(struct bpf_map *map)
> +static void htab_map_free_timers_and_wq(struct bpf_map *map)
> {
> struct bpf_htab *htab = container_of(map, struct bpf_htab, map);
>
> - /* We only free timer o
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 2:10 AM Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>
> We need to teach the verifier about the second argument which is declared
> as void * but which is of type KF_ARG_PTR_TO_MAP. We could have dropped
> this extra case if we declared the second argument as struct bpf_map *,
> but that mea
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 2:10 AM Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> @@ -11018,6 +11027,7 @@ enum special_kfunc_type {
> KF_bpf_percpu_obj_drop_impl,
> KF_bpf_throw,
> KF_bpf_iter_css_task_new,
> + KF_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl,
> };
>
> BTF_SET_START(special_kfunc_set)
> @@ -
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 2:10 AM Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>
> +
> +SEC("tc")
> +/* test that workqueues can be used from an array
> + */
> +__retval(0)
> +long test_call_array_sleepable(void *ctx)
> +{
> + int key = 0;
> +
> + return test_elem_callback(&array, &key);
> +}
> +
> +SEC("s
Thanks all for the reply.
On 2024/4/24 03:15, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, Andrew Jones wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 07:56:01AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
+others
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, Markus Elfring wrote:
…
This patch will add the malloc failure checking
…
*
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov :
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 11:09:00 +0200 you wrote:
> This is a followup of sleepable bpf_timer[0].
>
> When discussing sleepable bpf_timer, it was thought that we should give
> a try to bpf_wq, as the 2 APIs are simil
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 06:26:06PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> run-tests.sh hides the output from the compiler unless the compilation
> fails. To recognize newly introduced warnings use -Werror by default.
>
> Also add a switch to disable -Werror in case the warnings are expected.
>
> Signed
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 12:15:47PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 07:56:01AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > +others
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > > …
> > > > > This patch will add th
99 matches
Mail list logo
