Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail

2024-05-02 Thread Mickaël Salaün
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 11:42:29AM GMT, Sean Christopherson wrote: > +kvm > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 01:43:14AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:39:02PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:14:04 -0800 K

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail

2024-05-02 Thread Sean Christopherson
+kvm On Tue, Mar 05, 2024, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 01:43:14AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:39:02PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:14:04 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > > > > > Ugh, I'm guessing vfork() "eats" the signal, IOW gran

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail

2024-03-05 Thread Mickaël Salaün
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 10:06:39AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 17:05:51 +0100 Mickaël Salaün wrote: > > > I think we have to -- other CIs are now showing the most of seccomp > > > failing now. (And I can confirm this now -- I had only tested seccomp > > > on earlier versions o

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail

2024-03-05 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 17:05:51 +0100 Mickaël Salaün wrote: > > I think we have to -- other CIs are now showing the most of seccomp > > failing now. (And I can confirm this now -- I had only tested seccomp > > on earlier versions of the series.) > > Sorry for the trouble, I found and fixed the vfork

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail

2024-03-05 Thread Mickaël Salaün
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 05:00:13PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 04:48:06PM +0100, Przemek Kitszel wrote: > > On 3/5/24 00:04, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 22:20:03 + Mark Brown wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 04:59:07PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wr

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail

2024-03-05 Thread Mickaël Salaün
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 04:48:06PM +0100, Przemek Kitszel wrote: > On 3/5/24 00:04, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 22:20:03 + Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 04:59:07PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > > > > > When running selftests for our subsystem in our CI w

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail

2024-03-05 Thread Mickaël Salaün
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 01:43:14AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:39:02PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:14:04 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > > > > Ugh, I'm guessing vfork() "eats" the signal, IOW grandchild signals, > > > > child exits? vfork() and signals..

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail

2024-03-05 Thread Przemek Kitszel
On 3/5/24 00:04, Jakub Kicinski wrote: On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 22:20:03 + Mark Brown wrote: On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 04:59:07PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: When running selftests for our subsystem in our CI we'd like all tests to pass. Currently some tests use SKIP for cases they expect to fail

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail

2024-03-05 Thread Kees Cook
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:39:02PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:14:04 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > > > Ugh, I'm guessing vfork() "eats" the signal, IOW grandchild signals, > > > child exits? vfork() and signals.. I'd rather leave to Kees || Mickael. > > > > Oh no, that does s

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail

2024-03-04 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:14:04 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > > Ugh, I'm guessing vfork() "eats" the signal, IOW grandchild signals, > > child exits? vfork() and signals.. I'd rather leave to Kees || Mickael. > > Oh no, that does seem bad. Since Mickaël is also seeing weird issues, > can we drop the vfor

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail

2024-03-04 Thread Kees Cook
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:04:11PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 22:20:03 + Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 04:59:07PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > > > When running selftests for our subsystem in our CI we'd like all > > > tests to pass. Currently some t

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail

2024-03-04 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 22:20:03 + Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 04:59:07PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > When running selftests for our subsystem in our CI we'd like all > > tests to pass. Currently some tests use SKIP for cases they > > expect to fail, because the kselftest_har

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail

2024-03-04 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 04:59:07PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > When running selftests for our subsystem in our CI we'd like all > tests to pass. Currently some tests use SKIP for cases they > expect to fail, because the kselftest_harness limits the return > codes to pass/fail/skip. XFAIL which

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail

2024-03-01 Thread patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by David S. Miller : On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:59:07 -0800 you wrote: > Hi! > > When running selftests for our subsystem in our CI we'd like all > tests to pass. Currently some tests use SKIP for cases they > expect to fail, because the k