Re: [RFC v2] MAINTAINERS: split kselftest entry into 'framework' and 'all'

2024-11-22 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:56:25 -0700 Shuah wrote: > > To me the dissonance between your admission that people don't CC the > > current list (IOW status quo isn't great) and the resistance to change > > is fairly apparent. But it is obviously your call. > My thinking is that people don't seem to CC

Re: [RFC v2] MAINTAINERS: split kselftest entry into 'framework' and 'all'

2024-11-22 Thread Shuah
On 11/18/24 14:23, Jakub Kicinski wrote: On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:02:29 -0700 Shuah Khan wrote: Sorry for the delay, the responses to v1 weren't super positive but I keep thinking this would be very useful :) Or at the very least I find workflows@ very useful and informative as a maintainer. Post

Re: [RFC v2] MAINTAINERS: split kselftest entry into 'framework' and 'all'

2024-11-18 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:02:29 -0700 Shuah Khan wrote: > > Sorry for the delay, the responses to v1 weren't super positive > > but I keep thinking this would be very useful :) Or at the very > > least I find workflows@ very useful and informative as a maintainer. > > > > Posting as an RFC because we

Re: [RFC v2] MAINTAINERS: split kselftest entry into 'framework' and 'all'

2024-11-18 Thread Shuah Khan
On 11/15/24 13:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote: The testing effort is increasing throughout the community. The tests are generally merged into the subsystem trees, and are of relatively narrow interest. The patch volume on linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org makes it hard to follow the changes to the framew

[RFC v2] MAINTAINERS: split kselftest entry into 'framework' and 'all'

2024-11-15 Thread Jakub Kicinski
The testing effort is increasing throughout the community. The tests are generally merged into the subsystem trees, and are of relatively narrow interest. The patch volume on linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org makes it hard to follow the changes to the framework, and discuss proposals. Create a new M