On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 9:51 PM Edgecombe, Rick P
wrote:
>
> +Yan
>
> On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 14:44 -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> > > I will take a look at rebasing the selftests on top of the Intel
> > > development branch and I can post it on our github branch. We can talk
> > > about co-developm
+Yan
On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 14:44 -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> > I will take a look at rebasing the selftests on top of the Intel
> > development branch and I can post it on our github branch. We can talk
> > about co-development offline. We already have some code that was
> > suggested by Isaku
On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 16:34 -0500, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> > We don't currently have plans to post a whole ~130 patch series. Instead we
> > plan
> > to post subsections out of the series as they slowly move into a maintainer
> > branch.
>
> So this means that we won't be able to post an updated vers
On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 3:56 PM Edgecombe, Rick P
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 15:42 -0500, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> > > > Hm you're right, I was looking more narrowly because of the kvm-coco-
> > > > queue conflicts, for some of which even v19 might be too old. The MMU
> > > > prep series uses a m
On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 15:42 -0500, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> > > Hm you're right, I was looking more narrowly because of the kvm-coco-
> > > queue conflicts, for some of which even v19 might be too old. The MMU
> > > prep series uses a much more recent kvm-coco-queue baseline.
> > >
> > > Rick, can we
On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 3:18 PM Verma, Vishal L wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 20:15 +, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> > On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 15:10 -0500, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 1:38 PM Verma, Vishal L
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 12:46 -0800, Sagi
On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 20:15 +, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 15:10 -0500, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 1:38 PM Verma, Vishal L
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 12:46 -0800, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > This is v4 of the patc
On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 15:10 -0500, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 1:38 PM Verma, Vishal L
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 12:46 -0800, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > This is v4 of the patch series for TDX selftests.
> > >
> > > It has been updated for Intel’s v
On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 1:38 PM Verma, Vishal L wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 12:46 -0800, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is v4 of the patch series for TDX selftests.
> >
> > It has been updated for Intel’s v17 of the TDX host patches which was
> > proposed here:
> > https://lore.ker
On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 12:46 -0800, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is v4 of the patch series for TDX selftests.
>
> It has been updated for Intel’s v17 of the TDX host patches which was
> proposed here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1699368322.git.isaku.yamah...@intel.com/
>
> The tre
Hello,
This is v4 of the patch series for TDX selftests.
It has been updated for Intel’s v17 of the TDX host patches which was
proposed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1699368322.git.isaku.yamah...@intel.com/
The tree can be found at:
https://github.com/googleprodkernel/linux-cc/tree/tdx
11 matches
Mail list logo
