On 8/9/2024 10:45 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
+static void sev_guest_status_assert(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t type)
+{
+ struct kvm_sev_guest_status status;
+ bool cond;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = __vm_sev_i
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
> >> +static void sev_guest_status_assert(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t type)
> >> +{
> >> + struct kvm_sev_guest_status status;
> >> + bool cond;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = __vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_GUEST_STATUS, &status);
> >> + cond
Hi Tom
On 7/11/2024 1:34 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 7/10/24 17:05, Pratik R. Sampat wrote:
>> Introduce tests for sev and sev-es ioctl that exercises the boot path
>> of launch, update and finish on an invalid policy.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pratik R. Sampat
>> ---
>> .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev
On 7/10/24 17:05, Pratik R. Sampat wrote:
> Introduce tests for sev and sev-es ioctl that exercises the boot path
> of launch, update and finish on an invalid policy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratik R. Sampat
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_smoke_test.c | 57 +++
> 1 file chan
On 7/11/2024 10:23 AM, Peter Gonda wrote:
>> +
>> +static void test_sev_launch(void *guest_code, uint32_t type, uint64_t
>> policy)
>> +{
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
>> + struct ucall uc;
>> + bool cond;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + vm = vm
> +
> +static void test_sev_launch(void *guest_code, uint32_t type, uint64_t policy)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
> + struct ucall uc;
> + bool cond;
> + int ret;
> +
> + vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(type, guest_code, &vcpu);
> +
Introduce tests for sev and sev-es ioctl that exercises the boot path
of launch, update and finish on an invalid policy.
Signed-off-by: Pratik R. Sampat
---
.../selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_smoke_test.c | 57 +++
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selfte
