On Sun Nov 3, 2024 at 4:05 PM MSK, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Subject prefix should be "[PATCH net-next v6]" (v7 for next version,
> obviously)
>
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 04:29:35PM +, Vladimir Vdovin wrote:
> > Check number of paths by fib_info_num_path(),
> > and update_or_create_fnhe() for every
Many thanks for your comments! Sent new patch with proper fixes
On Sun Nov 3, 2024 at 4:05 PM MSK, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Subject prefix should be "[PATCH net-next v6]" (v7 for next version,
> obviously)
>
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 04:29:35PM +, Vladimir Vdovin wrote:
> > Check number of path
Subject prefix should be "[PATCH net-next v6]" (v7 for next version,
obviously)
On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 04:29:35PM +, Vladimir Vdovin wrote:
> Check number of paths by fib_info_num_path(),
> and update_or_create_fnhe() for every path.
> Problem is that pmtu is cached only for the oif
> that ha
Check number of paths by fib_info_num_path(),
and update_or_create_fnhe() for every path.
Problem is that pmtu is cached only for the oif
that has received icmp message "need to frag",
other oifs will still try to use "default" iface mtu.
An example topology showing the problem:
