On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 3:04 AM Xu Kuohai wrote:
> On 7/23/2024 5:35 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 5:31 AM Xu Kuohai wrote:
> >> On 7/19/2024 10:08 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>> On Jul 11, 2024 Xu Kuohai wrote:
>
> To be consistent with most LSM hooks, convert the ret
On 7/23/2024 5:35 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 5:31 AM Xu Kuohai wrote:
On 7/19/2024 10:08 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Jul 11, 2024 Xu Kuohai wrote:
To be consistent with most LSM hooks, convert the return value of
hook key_getsecurity to 0 or a negative error code.
Before:
-
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 5:31 AM Xu Kuohai wrote:
> On 7/19/2024 10:08 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Jul 11, 2024 Xu Kuohai wrote:
> >>
> >> To be consistent with most LSM hooks, convert the return value of
> >> hook key_getsecurity to 0 or a negative error code.
> >>
> >> Before:
> >> - Hook key_g
On 7/19/2024 10:08 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Jul 11, 2024 Xu Kuohai wrote:
To be consistent with most LSM hooks, convert the return value of
hook key_getsecurity to 0 or a negative error code.
Before:
- Hook key_getsecurity returns length of value on success or a
negative error code on fail
On Jul 11, 2024 Xu Kuohai wrote:
>
> To be consistent with most LSM hooks, convert the return value of
> hook key_getsecurity to 0 or a negative error code.
>
> Before:
> - Hook key_getsecurity returns length of value on success or a
> negative error code on failure.
>
> After:
> - Hook key_g
