On Thu, 05 Oct 2023 17:55:31 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> And this is the last(?) revision of this series which should now compile
> with or without CONFIG_HID_BPF set.
>
> I had to do changes because [1] was failing
>
> Nick, I kept your Tested-by, even if I made small changes in 1/3. Feel
On Thu, 2023-10-05 at 17:55 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > And this is the last(?) revision of this series which should now compile
> > with or without CONFIG_HID_BPF set.
> >
> > I had to do changes because [1] was failing
> >
> > Nick, I kept your Tested-by, even if I made small changes i
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 8:55 AM Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>
> And this is the last(?) revision of this series which should now compile
> with or without CONFIG_HID_BPF set.
>
> I had to do changes because [1] was failing
>
> Nick, I kept your Tested-by, even if I made small changes in 1/3. Feel
> f
And this is the last(?) revision of this series which should now compile
with or without CONFIG_HID_BPF set.
I had to do changes because [1] was failing
Nick, I kept your Tested-by, even if I made small changes in 1/3. Feel
free to shout if you don't want me to keep it.
Eduard, You helped us a l
