Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/7] selftests: drv-net: support testing with a remote system

2024-04-24 Thread Willem de Bruijn
Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:13:41 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > > I haven't thought about this part much, TBH. I'm not aware of any > > > scheme used in other tests. > > > IIUC the problem is that we need root locally, and then try to SSH > > > over to remote. But normally th

Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/7] selftests: drv-net: support testing with a remote system

2024-04-24 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:13:41 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > I haven't thought about this part much, TBH. I'm not aware of any > > scheme used in other tests. > > IIUC the problem is that we need root locally, and then try to SSH > > over to remote. But normally the SSH keys belong to the non-roo

Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/7] selftests: drv-net: support testing with a remote system

2024-04-24 Thread Willem de Bruijn
Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 13:57:45 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > Only possible non-obvious observation is that some kselftests expect > > as root, and the ssh remote logic extends that to expecting ssh > > root access to the remote host. > > > > Would it make sense to explici

Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/7] selftests: drv-net: support testing with a remote system

2024-04-23 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 13:57:45 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote: > Only possible non-obvious observation is that some kselftests expect > as root, and the ssh remote logic extends that to expecting ssh > root access to the remote host. > > Would it make sense to explicitly add sudo for all privileged >

Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/7] selftests: drv-net: support testing with a remote system

2024-04-23 Thread Willem de Bruijn
Willem de Bruijn wrote: > Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Implement support for tests which require access to a remote system / > > endpoint which can generate traffic. > > This series concludes the "groundwork" for upstream driver tests. > > > > I wanted to support the three models which c

Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/7] selftests: drv-net: support testing with a remote system

2024-04-23 Thread patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:52:30 -0700 you wrote: > Hi! > > Implement support for tests which require access to a remote system / > endpoint which can generate traffic. > This series concludes the "groundwork" for upstr

Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/7] selftests: drv-net: support testing with a remote system

2024-04-21 Thread Willem de Bruijn
Jakub Kicinski wrote: > Hi! > > Implement support for tests which require access to a remote system / > endpoint which can generate traffic. > This series concludes the "groundwork" for upstream driver tests. > > I wanted to support the three models which came up in discussions: > - SW testing w

[PATCH net-next v5 0/7] selftests: drv-net: support testing with a remote system

2024-04-19 Thread Jakub Kicinski
Hi! Implement support for tests which require access to a remote system / endpoint which can generate traffic. This series concludes the "groundwork" for upstream driver tests. I wanted to support the three models which came up in discussions: - SW testing with netdevsim - "local" testing with