er.kernel.org;
> x...@kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; Shuah Khan
> ; linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org; Fontenot,
> Nathan ; Sharma, Deepak
> ; Deucher, Alexander
> ; Huang, Shimmer
> ; Yuan, Perry ; Du,
> Xiaojian ; Viresh Kumar ;
> Borislav Petkov ; Rafael J . Wysocki
&
On 9/20/2023 14:34, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
Hello.
On středa 20. září 2023 18:56:09 CEST Mario Limonciello wrote:
When applied on top of v6.5.3 this breaks turbo on my 5950X after
suspend/resume cycle. Please see the scenario description below.
If I boot v6.5.3 + this patchset, then `turbo
Hello.
On středa 20. září 2023 18:56:09 CEST Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > When applied on top of v6.5.3 this breaks turbo on my 5950X after
> > suspend/resume cycle. Please see the scenario description below.
> >
> > If I boot v6.5.3 + this patchset, then `turbostat` reports ~4.9 GHz on core
>
On 9/19/2023 14:01, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
Meng Li (7):
x86: Drop CPU_SUP_INTEL from SCHED_MC_PRIO for the expansion.
acpi: cppc: Add get the highest performance cppc control
cpufreq: amd-pstate: Enable amd-pstate preferred core supporting.
cpufreq: Add a notification message that
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 04:14:00PM +0800, Meng, Li (Jassmine) wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> The core frequency is subjected to the process variation in semiconductors.
> Not all cores are able to reach the maximum frequency respecting the
> infrastructure limits. Consequently, AMD has redefined the concept
Hello.
On pondělí 18. září 2023 10:14:00 CEST Meng Li wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> The core frequency is subjected to the process variation in semiconductors.
> Not all cores are able to reach the maximum frequency respecting the
> infrastructure limits. Consequently, AMD has redefined the concept of
> m
.@kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; Shuah Khan
> ; linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org; Fontenot,
> Nathan ; Sharma, Deepak
> ; Deucher, Alexander
> ; Huang, Shimmer
> ; Yuan, Perry ; Du,
> Xiaojian ; Viresh Kumar ;
> Borislav Petkov
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/7] amd-pstat
On 9/18/23 11:44, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 9/18/23 02:14, Meng Li wrote:
Hi all:
The core frequency is subjected to the process variation in semiconductors.
Not all cores are able to reach the maximum frequency respecting the
infrastructure limits. Consequently, AMD has redefined the concept of
max
On 9/18/23 02:14, Meng Li wrote:
Hi all:
The core frequency is subjected to the process variation in semiconductors.
Not all cores are able to reach the maximum frequency respecting the
infrastructure limits. Consequently, AMD has redefined the concept of
maximum frequency of a part. This means
On 9/18/2023 03:14, Meng Li wrote:
Hi all:
The core frequency is subjected to the process variation in semiconductors.
Not all cores are able to reach the maximum frequency respecting the
infrastructure limits. Consequently, AMD has redefined the concept of
maximum frequency of a part. This mean
Hi all:
The core frequency is subjected to the process variation in semiconductors.
Not all cores are able to reach the maximum frequency respecting the
infrastructure limits. Consequently, AMD has redefined the concept of
maximum frequency of a part. This means that a fraction of cores can reach
11 matches
Mail list logo
