On Feb 13 2024, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 18:46, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 12 2024, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 10:21 AM Benjamin Tissoires
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 6:46 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Alexei Starovoitov writes:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 08:51:26PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 18:46, Benjamin Tissoires
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Feb 12 2024, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 10
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 08:51:26PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi writes:
>
> > On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 18:46, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> >>
> >> On Feb 12 2024, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 10:21 AM Benjamin Tissoires
> >> > wrote:
>
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 08:23:17PM +0100, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 18:46, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 12 2024, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 10:21 AM Benjamin Tissoires
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 6:46
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi writes:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 18:46, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 12 2024, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 10:21 AM Benjamin Tissoires
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 6:46 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
>> > > wrote:
>>
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 18:46, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>
> On Feb 12 2024, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 10:21 AM Benjamin Tissoires
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 6:46 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Benjamin Tissoires writes:
>
On Feb 12 2024, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 10:21 AM Benjamin Tissoires
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 6:46 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Benjamin Tissoires writes:
> > >
[...]
> I agree that workqueue delegation fits into the bpf_timer conce
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 10:21 AM Benjamin Tissoires
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 6:46 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> wrote:
> >
> > Benjamin Tissoires writes:
> >
> > [...]
> > >> IIUC, the bpf_timer callback is just a function (subprog) from the
> > >> verifier PoV, so it is verified as wha
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 6:46 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Benjamin Tissoires writes:
>
> [...]
> >> IIUC, the bpf_timer callback is just a function (subprog) from the
> >> verifier PoV, so it is verified as whatever program type is creating the
> >> timer. So in other words, as long as yo
Benjamin Tissoires writes:
[...]
>> IIUC, the bpf_timer callback is just a function (subprog) from the
>> verifier PoV, so it is verified as whatever program type is creating the
>> timer. So in other words, as long as you setup the timer from inside a
>> tracing prog type, you should have access
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 6:05 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Benjamin Tissoires writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 4:42 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Benjamin Tissoires writes:
> >>
> >> > [Putting this as a RFC because I'm pretty sure I'm not doing the things
> >> > cor
Benjamin Tissoires writes:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 4:42 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>> Benjamin Tissoires writes:
>>
>> > [Putting this as a RFC because I'm pretty sure I'm not doing the things
>> > correctly at the BPF level.]
>> > [Also using bpf-next as the base tree as there will b
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 4:42 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Benjamin Tissoires writes:
>
> > [Putting this as a RFC because I'm pretty sure I'm not doing the things
> > correctly at the BPF level.]
> > [Also using bpf-next as the base tree as there will be conflicting
> > changes otherwise]
Benjamin Tissoires writes:
> [Putting this as a RFC because I'm pretty sure I'm not doing the things
> correctly at the BPF level.]
> [Also using bpf-next as the base tree as there will be conflicting
> changes otherwise]
>
> Ideally I'd like to have something similar to bpf_timers, but not
> in
[Putting this as a RFC because I'm pretty sure I'm not doing the things
correctly at the BPF level.]
[Also using bpf-next as the base tree as there will be conflicting
changes otherwise]
Ideally I'd like to have something similar to bpf_timers, but not
in soft IRQ context. So I'm emulating this wi
15 matches
Mail list logo