Re: [PATCH 4/5] selftests/nolibc: support out-of-tree builds

2023-10-26 Thread Zhangjin Wu
Hi, Thomas > Oct 22, 2023 11:31:32 Willy Tarreau : > > > (...) > > > > I think you should add a Suggested-by at least since Zhangjin attempted > > that work quite a few times already and allowed to make progress in that > > direction (maybe even co-developed, I'm not sure). > > Indeed. For a pro

Re: [PATCH 4/5] selftests/nolibc: support out-of-tree builds

2023-10-24 Thread Thomas Weißschuh
Oct 22, 2023 11:31:32 Willy Tarreau : > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 02:33:59PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: >> Out of tree builds are much more convenient when building for multiple >> architectures or configurations in parallel. >> >> Only absolute O= parameters are supported as Makefile.include wi

Re: [PATCH 4/5] selftests/nolibc: support out-of-tree builds

2023-10-22 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 02:33:59PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > Out of tree builds are much more convenient when building for multiple > architectures or configurations in parallel. > > Only absolute O= parameters are supported as Makefile.include will > always resolve relative paths in relati

[PATCH 4/5] selftests/nolibc: support out-of-tree builds

2023-10-10 Thread Thomas Weißschuh
Out of tree builds are much more convenient when building for multiple architectures or configurations in parallel. Only absolute O= parameters are supported as Makefile.include will always resolve relative paths in relation to $(srctree) instead of the current directory. Add a call to "make outp