Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/nolibc: run-user improvements

2024-08-02 Thread Shuah Khan
On 11/9/23 11:04, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 06:44:44PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2077 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:     I'm curious how this happened, especially since this was sent with b4. My system time was me

Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/nolibc: run-user improvements

2023-11-09 Thread Konstantin Ryabitsev
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 06:44:44PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2077 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > >     > > > > I'm curious how this happened, especially since this was sent with b4. > > My system time was messed up. > I blame systemd-times

Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/nolibc: run-user improvements

2023-11-09 Thread Thomas Weißschuh
Nov 9, 2023 17:28:45 Konstantin Ryabitsev : > On Wed, Sep 15, 2077 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: >     > > I'm curious how this happened, especially since this was sent with b4. My system time was messed up. I blame systemd-timesyncd.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/nolibc: run-user improvements

2023-11-09 Thread Konstantin Ryabitsev
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 05:31:42PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > I'm curious how this happened, especially since this was sent with b4. > > We didn't want to tell you, but you slept 54 years Konstantin, the > current kernel is version 41.8 ;-) Dang, I see we still use email for kernel developme

Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/nolibc: run-user improvements

2023-11-09 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:28:41AM -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2077 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > I'm curious how this happened, especially since this was sent with b4. We didn't want to tell you, but you slept 54 years Konstantin

Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/nolibc: run-user improvements

2023-11-09 Thread Konstantin Ryabitsev
On Wed, Sep 15, 2077 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: I'm curious how this happened, especially since this was sent with b4. -K