re.kernel.org/all/20241009162719.0adae...@canb.auug.org.au/
>
> Again, I appreciate your time and review. I hope this answered some of your
> questions.
> I'll continue to follow this thread so as to make any additional fixes
> from further reviews before sending out the next version.
Okay, I will wait for new Linux next tags.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Linux Next...
...
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
linux/limits.h, of course.
Sorry that I wasn't clear about this, but it's kinda rule of thumb that all
headers in 99.999% kernel-space related files in the Linux kernel are from
in-project folders and not from outside.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_div64.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_MULDIV64) += test_mul_u64_u64_div_u64.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RATIONAL_KUNIT_TEST) += rational-test.o
> +obj-y += tests/
> \ No newline at end of file
^^^ Please, fix this.
...
> +#include
+ limits.h
> +#include
+ module.h
+ string.h
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
series and add
> changes on top of that for new macros.
>
> Kindly let me know your thoughts on this.
Wow, blast from the past!
But good finding, it would be good to have more math.h related test cases.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
ed by following commit
>
> commit 66a5c40f60f5d88ad8d47ba6a4ba05892853fa1f
> kernel.h: removed REPEAT_BYTE from kernel.h
Thanks for the report.
What is missing here are the steps to reproduce it here. E.g., I have
an x86_64 machine, I can use QEMU if required.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 07:21:32PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju kirjoitti:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 at 22:11, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:57:28AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:16 AM Naresh Kamboju
> > > wr
