Re: [PATCH 0/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing

2024-02-29 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:53:38PM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote: > > On 29/02/2024 12:41, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:19:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > >> On Thu, Fe

Re: [PATCH 0/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing

2024-02-29 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:53:38PM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote: > On 29/02/2024 12:41, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:19:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:10:16PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: > > > >>&g

Re: [PATCH 0/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing

2024-02-29 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:10:16PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: > On 2/29/24 11:34 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:26:51AM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: > >> On 2/29/24 01:07, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at

Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing

2024-02-29 Thread Laurent Pinchart
entry YAML, *inside* the repo (somewhere > > under "ci" directory) instead. > > > > This way all the different subtrees can have completely different setup, but > > some could still use Helen's work and employ the "scenarios" she > > implemented. > > I'm worried that this kind of setup will just create duplicated YAML > that will be developped in complete silos and will become difficult to > maintain. But that's definitely an opinion :) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH 0/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing

2024-02-29 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:26:51AM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: > On 2/29/24 01:07, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:55:24PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote: > >> **Join Our Slack Channel:** > >> We have a Slack channel, #gitlab-ci, on the KernelCI

Re: [PATCH 0/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing

2024-02-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
kpatch.sh > create mode 100755 ci/gitlab-ci/ci-scripts/run-smatch.sh > create mode 100644 ci/gitlab-ci/docker-compose.yaml > create mode 100644 ci/gitlab-ci/linux.code-workspace > create mode 100644 ci/gitlab-ci/yml/build.yml > create mode 100644 ci/gitlab-ci/yml/cache.yml > create mode 100644 ci/gitlab-ci/yml/container.yml > create mode 100644 ci/gitlab-ci/yml/gitlab-ci.yml > create mode 100644 ci/gitlab-ci/yml/kernel-combinations.yml > create mode 100644 ci/gitlab-ci/yml/scenarios.yml > create mode 100644 ci/gitlab-ci/yml/scenarios/file-systems.yml > create mode 100644 ci/gitlab-ci/yml/scenarios/media.yml > create mode 100644 ci/gitlab-ci/yml/scenarios/network.yml > create mode 100644 ci/gitlab-ci/yml/static-checks.yml -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart