Re: [PATCH 1/2] unicode: kunit: refactor selftest to kunit tests

2024-09-24 Thread André Almeida
Em 24 de setembro de 2024 23:40:27 GMT+02:00, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi escreveu: >André Almeida writes: > >> Hey! >> >> On 9/23/24 19:34, Gabriela Bittencourt wrote: >>> Instead of creating 'test' functions, use kunit functions to test >>> utf-8 support in unicode subsystem. >> >> I think it w

Re: [PATCH 1/2] unicode: kunit: refactor selftest to kunit tests

2024-09-24 Thread Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
André Almeida writes: > Hey! > > On 9/23/24 19:34, Gabriela Bittencourt wrote: >> Instead of creating 'test' functions, use kunit functions to test >> utf-8 support in unicode subsystem. > > I think it would be nice to explain in the commit message what are the > benefits of this change, why refa

Re: [PATCH 1/2] unicode: kunit: refactor selftest to kunit tests

2024-09-24 Thread André Almeida
Hey! On 9/23/24 19:34, Gabriela Bittencourt wrote: Instead of creating 'test' functions, use kunit functions to test utf-8 support in unicode subsystem. I think it would be nice to explain in the commit message what are the benefits of this change, why refactoring into KUnit is a good idea?

[PATCH v4] Kunit to check the longest symbol length

2024-09-24 Thread Sergio González Collado
The longest length of a symbol (KSYM_NAME_LEN) was increased to 512 in the reference [1]. This patch adds a kunit test to check the longest symbol length. This test can also help other efforts for longer symbol lenght, like [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220802015052.10452-6-oj...@kernel

Re: [PATCH v5 19/30] arm64: add POE signal support

2024-09-24 Thread Dave Martin
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 01:27:58PM +0200, Kevin Brodsky wrote: > On 22/08/2024 17:11, Joey Gouly wrote: > > @@ -1178,6 +1237,9 @@ static void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct > > k_sigaction *ka, > > sme_smstop(); > > } > > > > + if (system_supports_poe()) > > +

Re: [PATCH v5 19/30] arm64: add POE signal support

2024-09-24 Thread Kevin Brodsky
On 22/08/2024 17:11, Joey Gouly wrote: > @@ -1178,6 +1237,9 @@ static void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct > k_sigaction *ka, > sme_smstop(); > } > > + if (system_supports_poe()) > + write_sysreg_s(POR_EL0_INIT, SYS_POR_EL0); At the point where setu