Hello,
At Sun, 8 Apr 2001 20:08:13 -0700 (PDT),
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Can anybody shoot any holes in this? I haven't actually tested it, but
> race conditions in locking primitives are slippery things, and I'd much
> rather have an algorithm we can _think_ about and prove to be working. And
At Mon, 9 Apr 2001 22:43:53 -0700 (PDT),
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The ordering is certainly possible, but if it happens,
> __down_read_failed() won't actually sleep, because it will notice that the
> value is positive and just return immediately. So it will do some
> unnecessary work (add itself
Hello,
At Fri, 02 Mar 2001 00:42:28 -0500,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> actually, its not just ps/2 mice -- it seems to be something generic to char
> devices. agpgartis failing to register itself, too.
>
> what changed with char device handling from ac7 to ac8?
>
> robert love
> [EMAIL PR
Hello,
2.4.2ac14 compilation fails when CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE is not enabled.
Here is my small patch.
diff -r -u linux-2.4.2-ac14.org/include/asm-i386/page.h
linux-2.4.2-ac14/include/asm-i386/page.h
--- linux-2.4.2-ac14.org/include/asm-i386/page.hThu Mar 8 09:31:45 2001
+++ linux-2
vmalloc_area_pages() in 2.4.2-ac25 seems to be broken. It calls
spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock) twice and causes system hang.
inline int vmalloc_area_pages (unsigned long address, unsigned long size,
int gfp_mask, pgprot_t prot)
{
pgd_t * dir;
Hello,
At Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:42:54 +0300,
Alexey Vyskubov wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Kernel 2.4.5.
>
> $ sudo mount -o iocharset=garbage /dev/cdrom /cdrom
>
> VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer
I think this is the ISOFS's bug. If invalid iocharset is specified
as a mount option, isofs_rea
Hello,
At Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:43:30 +0100 (BST),
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I get an ooops and immediate kernel panic when I break (CTRL-C) cdrecord. I
> > can reproduce it anytime. I use 2.4.5-ac series. Obviously, Linus' 2.4.5 is
> > fine.
> > I know, I know. I was supposed to make a serios oops
Hello,
At Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:15:10,
Trevor Hemsley wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 03:05:02, "Jeff V. Merkey"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ditto. I am also seeing this oops calling the sg driver for a
> > robotic tape library, and it also seems to happen on 2.4.4.
>
> In my case it a
Hello,
At Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:52:12 +1000,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [1.] One line summary of the problem:
>
> poll() timeout always takes 10ms too long
>
> [2.] Full description of the problem/report:
>
> Select() timeouts work fine. A timeout between 10n-9 and 10n ms times
> out af
Hello,
At Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:01:43 +,
Gav wrote:
>
> This second one was immediately after rebooting, and hard locked at getty.
>
> kernel BUG at slab.c:1244!
> invalid operand:
> CPU:0
> EIP:0010:[]
> EFLAGS: 00010082
> eax: 001b ebx: c187f788 ecx: 0001 edx: 00
10 matches
Mail list logo