I have installed a Win2000 and you do not have to switch to NTFS. W2000
can be installed on a FAT32 partition. I have installed it on a FAT32
partition and hasn't caused me any problems.
You might wanna give it a try.
good luck,
/me
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Where d
I have a Intel Pentium MMX machine and it acts as a mailserver, webserver,
ftp and I use X on it. I would like to know if the MMX instructions are
used by the kernel in this operations or not (networking, X etc.).
Thank you,
/me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linu
Thank you all who have responded my question.
Have a nice day!
/me
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I have a Intel Pentium MMX machine and it acts as a mailserver, webserver,
> > ftp and I use X on it. I would like to know if the MMX instructions are
> > used by the kernel in this ope
I read this article on theregister today:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/15620.html
Does anyone have any details on this? I presume that the drive
firmware is capable of identifying copy-protected data during
a write. I also presume that nobody on lkml would condone
such a terrible idea. I
I have an ASUS CUV4X-D Dual Processor Mainboard based on a VIA
694XDP chipset. I notice from the archives that someone else
has also reported a lockup with the m/b when using two cpus
and have some info that may be useful to track it down.
Using kernel 2.4.5 the kernel locks up sporadically at bo
Further information:
I inserted some printk()s in arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c
320 static void __init synchronize_tsc_ap (void)
321 {
322 int i;
323
324 /*
325* smp_num_cpus is not necessarily known at the time
326* this gets called, so
Hi,
I have a question regarding blocked signals:
Is the current implementation to ignore attempts to set SIG_IGN on
blocked signals correct?
The following code will go into an endless loop on kernels 2.6.10 and
2.4.25, which is IMHO not the behaviour one would expect.
#in
Hi,
I have a question regarding blocked signals:
Is the current implementation to ignore attempts to set SIG_IGN on
blocked signals correct?
The following code will go into an endless loop on kernels 2.6.10 and
2.4.25, which is IMHO not the behaviour one would expect.
#in
s.
>
>
> Richard Schilling
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > Speaking of:
> > A TV station in my country said that the most pirated products belong to
> > M$ because computers cannot work wothout the GUI M$ windows
on reiserfs ls -U show soething like:
one two four three
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> With Linux ext2, and some other systems, when you create files in a
> new directory, the file system remembers their order:
>
> $ mkdir new
> $ cd new
> $ touch one two three four
>
Speaking of:
A TV station in my country said that the most pirated products belong to
M$ because computers cannot work wothout the GUI M$ windows provides.
In my country about 75% percent of M$ software are illegal copies :)
> > I suppose they received some pression from M$, but if people
);
schedule_timeout(unsigned long timeout); /* schedule_timeout(10*HZ) will
suspend process & resume execution after 10 seconds */
set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
}
hope it helps
regards
lk
- Original Message -
From: "Banu R Reefath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wedne
function you are trying to look for an
equivalent of try_to_swap_out() is add_to_swap() and after that
try_to_unmap() which will add the page of page cache to swap cache
and remove entry from the page table respectively.
regards
lk
- Original Message -
From: "Josef E. Galea&quo
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Sourav Sen wrote:
> In some parts of the kernel code I find expression like
>
> len = (len + ~PAGE_MASK) & PAGE_MASK ;
>
> Whats happening to len?
It's being aligned properly.
if you have a continuous array of objects that are each 8 bytes, you
create a mask that's FFF8
14 matches
Mail list logo
