[PATCH 1/3] mailbox: rename pl320-ipc specific mailbox.h

From: Suman Anna The patch 30058677 "ARM / highbank: add support for pl320 IPC" added a pl320 IPC specific header file as a generic mailbox.h. This file has been renamed appropriately to allow the introduction of the generic mailbox API framework. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Cc: Mark Langsdorf C

Re: Problem with Ramdisk in linux-2.4.1

(18 Aug 93) But when i use same ramdisk with old kernel like 2.2.12 , it works fine . Please help me. Thanks , Best Regards, Jaswinder. -- These are my opinions not 3Di. - Original Message - From: "Mike Galbraith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jaswinder Singh"

Re: Problem with Ramdisk in linux-2.4.1

. I am using Ramdisk of 8 MB on compression it becomes around 1.4 MB. Please help me. Thanks , Best Regards, Jaswinder. -- These are my opinions not 3Di. - Original Message - From: "Jaswinder Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mike Galbraith" <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Problem with Ramdisk in linux-2.4.1

Dear Mike , - Original Message - From: "Mike Galbraith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jaswinder Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 11:56 AM Subject: Re: Problem with Ramdisk in linux-2.4.1 > O

Kernel executation from ROM

Dear Kernel mailing list , what changes i have to made in kernel so that i can run kernel from ROM, means i keep my kernel in ROM and i execute my kernel from ROM . Thanks , Happy Hacking, Jaswinder. -- These are my opinions not 3Di. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscr

Re: Kernel executation from ROM

AIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jaswinder Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 6:49 PM Subject: RE: Kernel executation from ROM > > You can laod the kernel from ROM, but it'll need RAM to execute. If you get to > be very good with the linker and loader, you

Re: Memory leak in the ramfs file system

Dear Linus, > What does /proc/slabinfo say? The most likely leak is a dentry leak or > an inode leak, and both of those should be fairly easy to see in the > slab info (dentry_cache and inode_cache respectively). > I am attaching details before and during my application . Mainly changes are i

Fw: Memory leak in the ramfs file system

I am sorry, i am sending this mail again because earlier my Computer's time was not set properly. Jaswinder - Original Message - From: "Jaswinder Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Linus Torvalds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "

Re: Memory leak in the ramfs file system

There is some problem in my computer's clock . please do not mind . I am sorry for inconvenience. Jaswinder. - Original Message - From: "Jaswinder Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Linus Torvalds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jamey Hicks" <[EMA

Problem with Ramdisk in linux-2.4.1

Dear linux-kernel mailing list, I am facing this problem in linux-2.4.1 :- RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 8192K size 1024 blocksize RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 incomplete distance tree invalid compressed format (err=1)Freeing initrd memory: 4096k freed Is any body s

Re: Problem with Ramdisk in linux-2.4.1

. - Original Message - From: "Jaswinder Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Jaswinder Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 12:19 AM Subject: Problem with Ramdisk in linux-2.4.1 > Dear linux-kernel mailing list, &g

Ramdisk Initialization Problem

I am using kernel 2.4.1 with compressed Ramdisk on Hitachi SH board , with no battery. When i run kernel first time , it works fine , it uncompress Ramdisk and i get my shell prompt .But when i restart it second time (with out removing power cable ) kernel dies when uncompressing Ramdi

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac17

Dear Alan , Have you noticed (or fixed ) :- 1. the Memory leakage in ramfs 2. initialization of Ramdisk. In you your new versions . I am adding some details about them , for your reference :- ### 1. the Memory leakage in ramfs (Subject of email was "Memor

Re: Ramdisk Initialization Problem

"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > First of all, try the latest kernel if you are going to report a bug. > As far as i know , Regarding Ramdisk linux-2.4.4 and 2.4.1 are similar. , no body fixed this problem after 2.4.1 , If somebody please let me know . Anyhow i will try with late

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac17

Dear Mike , > > This one I tested with memleak. It wasn't a leak, it was dcache > growth. Under vm stress, it shrank down fine. > It will depends upon lot of thing :- 1.What is your size of ramfs , 2. Are you using any harddisk , 3. How many many files are you creating , 4. How frequently you

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac17

Dear Mike , Are you using harddisk ? Jaswinder. - Original Message - From: "Mike Galbraith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jaswinder Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 25,

Re: Reg:usage of insmod

Dear Satish, you are getting this error because , you are not defining MODULE during compilation of your module. Please Refer to http://packetstorm.securify.com/groups/thc/LKM_HACKING.html Best Regards, Jaswinder. - Original Message - From: "SATHISH.J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

Dear Greg, > > Use LinuxSH standard BIOS > CONFIG_SH_STANDARD_BIOS > Say Y here if your target has the gdb-sh-stub package from > www.m17n.org (or any conforming standard LinuxSH BIOS) in FLASH > or EPROM. The kernel will use standard BIOS calls during boot > for various housekeeping tas

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

> > The class of machines for which this option does not apply is > "machines with an existing operating system in mask rom and no > flash", which AFAICT is equivalent to "WindowsCE machines > ". The AFAIK WindowsCE machines are also broad term. BTW, how many WindowsCE machines are fully (mea

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac17

> > The OS resides on disk, yes. I suppose I could plunk a minimal > system into ramfs, pivot_root and umount disk, but I don't see > any way that could matter for a memory leak. > It is very difficult to see memory leak , with hard disks . As i told you , in my case i am using no harddisks , o

Re: Reg- segmentation fault

Dear Satish, What you means by "segmentation fault on my linux m/c" ? Segmentation fault is coming from your applications or from Linux Packages or from Linux kernel ? BTW, segmentation fault indicates an improper memory access , A common cause for a segmentation fault is an attempt to access a

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac17

> > The OS resides on disk, yes. I suppose I could plunk a minimal > system into ramfs, pivot_root and umount disk, but I don't see > any way that could matter for a memory leak. > It is very difficult to see memory leak , with hard disks . As i told you , in my case i am using no harddisks , o

Re: QOS &fair queuing modules- can't load

>Let me put across my situation. I need to load the > modules for QOS & Fair Queuing . I have compiled my > kernel with modular support for these modules. When I > try to load these modules a series of error messages > all indicating unresolved symbols are coming. The > unresolved symbols are

Re: IDE Performance lack !

> > RedHat 7.1 - IDE IBM 41.1 GIG > Update to 2.4.5 -> noticed, that hdparm -t /dev/hda went down from 10 > MByte/sec to 1.9 MByte/sec > Any special Options, beside ide-scsi driver activated .. > > Anybody noticed the same problem ? Any clues ? > yes , i am also not happy with IDE performance of

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

"Greg Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Can we use "HP Jornada 600 series" inspite of "WindowsCE machine" ? > > Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean here. > forget about it ;) > > But Compaq is playing nice in a way HP (or at least the division > that makes Jornadas) isn't. Further

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac17

Dear Mike, "Mike Galbraith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > Exactly. Nothing but ram and it's mostly unfreeable. That makes > life pretty tough for the vm. > This is not a good concept at all , why linux is wasting precious RAM unnecassarily, if not required . Then what will happen for Embed

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

Dear Greg, > > Modems are tricky, because they're frequently WinModems which > have a whole lot of well-known issues. Other features depend on > the speed at which they can be reverse engineered, as most > WinCE manufacturers don't co-operate. I'd be surprised if any > WindowsCE machine's har

Re: IDE Performance lack !

"Chris Wedgwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 05:16:42PM -0700, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > When ever i copy big data (around 400 to 700 MB ) from one > partion to another my machine do not response at all (i can not > wor

Re: IDE Performance lack !

From: "Jakob Østergaard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > The answer for both of you is: > > hdparm -d1 /dev/hd{whatever} > > Without DMA enabled, performance is going to suck. 1.9 MB/sec is actually pretty > good without DMA ;) > i think DMA or PCI is not my solution , atleast :) Thank you,

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

"Greg Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have some code which could become the basis for such a thing. > It's a touch panel driver for the DMIDA but it also has a device- > independent layer which does supersampling, scaling, provides > raw and cooked Linux Input interfaces, and a /proc i

Re: CPU Dedicated Interrupts

> What is the easiest way to tell a CPU to ignore certain interrupts from > module? > Is there an IRQ mask for each processor? Is that symbol exported? > I also what to know this :) Please help us . Thank you. Jaswinder. -- These are my opinions not 3Di. - To unsubscribe from this list: s

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

"Greg Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Manufacturer = DataMyte, a division of Rockwell. > Machine = DataMyte Industrial Digital Assistant 4000 > (aka DMIDA, www.dmida.com) > What is the companion chip in DMIDA ? IrDA and USB are working properly in linux ? Thank you, Be

Re: IDE Performance lack !

"Miquel van Smoorenburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are you sure it is idle. It might be running something from cron- > say 'updatedb' or similar. That will cause a lot of disk i/o, > and _ofcourse_ performance will be bad then - the machine is > doing a lot of other things. > I am the only

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

"Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > Handwriting recognition with fscrib works very well indeed. > But not in Linux SH , there is so Touch Panel Interface in Linux SH yet :( Thank you, Best Regards, Jaswinder. -- These are my opinions not 3Di. - To unsubscribe from this list: sen

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

"Greg Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > > > > > > BTW, how many WindowsCE machines are fully (means all the features as > > provided by Windows CE) supported by LinuxSH and how many machines are > > partially(onl

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

Dear Greg, "Greg Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > Ok, I've found the description of this on handhelds.org, and > it appears to be a derivative of xscribble, which I have tried. > Unlike xscribble it does fullscreen mode, which is good, but > it's still single-character and requires the us

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

"Greg Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > Alan Cox wrote: > > > > Including open source drivers for their touchscreen ? > > I believe so, but I only write the stuff. We'll know for > sure when somebody actually buys one ;-) > Please send a copy to all of us ;) Jaswinder. -- These are my

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

> > The class of machines for which this option does not apply is > "machines with an existing operating system in mask rom and no > flash", which AFAICT is equivalent to "WindowsCE machines > ". The AFAIK WindowsCE machines are also broad term. BTW, how many WindowsCE machines are fully (mea

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : > Select HP620 if configuring for a HP Jornada HP620. > More information at > . > > Select HP680 if configuring for a HP Jornada HP680. > More information at > . > > Select HP690 if confi

Emulate RDTSC

Hi all, What is the nice way (in accuracy and performance) to emulate RDTSC in Linux for those architectures who dont support RDTSC like in Hitachi SH Processors. Thank you, Best Regards, Jaswinder. -- These are my opinions not 3Di. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: rtl8139too in 2.4.5

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > My RTL8139 (Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8139A') > was fine in 2.4.3 and doesnt work in 2.4.5. > Copying the 2.4.3 version of 8139too.c makes things work again. > but my old RTL8139 is working fine under 2.4.5 , without any changes. Jaswinder. -- These are my

Benchmarks for Linux kernel

Can please point me some nice benchmarks for linux kernel . Which tells the performance of following , under Linux Kernel :- 1. CPU 2. Bus 3. Cache 4. DMA 5. Interrupts and Exceptions 6. File Systems 7. FPU 8. forking and pthread (Process Management) 9. IDE 10. Ethernet 11. Memory Management 1

Task Switching in Linux

In Linux , If we assume that there are only 2 tasks A and B and both are equal , this is correct or not :- TASK A -> schedule -> switch_to -> TASK B -> schedule -> switch_to -> schedule -> switch_to -> TASK A. Thank you, Best Regards, Jaswinder. -- These are my opinions not 3Di. - To unsub

Re: 2.6.23-rc9-rt2

Hello Steve, Do you have any plans to support nested or reentrant Interrupt Handling schemes. Thank you, Jaswinder SIngh. On 10/5/07, Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are pleased to announce the 2.6.23-rc9-rt2 tree, which can be > downloaded from the new locatio

Re: 2.6.23-rc9-rt2

Hi Steve, On 10/8/07, Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -- > On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > > Do you have any plans to support nested or reentrant Interrupt Handling > > schemes. > > > > Hi Jaswinder, > > Not sure wha

[WARNINGS] 2.6.24-rc3 x86 make

7/ac97_patch.h:87: warning: 'snd_ac97_restore_iec958' declared 'static' but never defined CC sound/pci/ac97/ac97_pcm.o Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3 x86 make depends on s390 arch

We have two options: 1. Either move arch/s390/crypto/Kconfig to drivers/crypto/Kconfig OR 2. In arch/s390/crypto/Kconfig , replace "depends on S390" to "depends on CRYPRO_HW" I think 2nd option is better for everyone. Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. On 11/30/07, Heiko Carste

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3 x86 make depends on s390 arch

Yes, what is the use of keeping other arch, if I am not going to build those. Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. On 11/30/07, Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 01:44:56PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > 2.6.24-rc3 git kernel's x86 make

[BUG] 2.6.24-rc3 x86 make depends on s390 arch

2. CC kernel/sysctl_check.o kernel/sysctl_check.c:3:44: error: ../arch/s390/appldata/appldata.h: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [kernel/sysctl_check.o] Error 1 make: *** [kernel] Error 2 Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

[PATCH] Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3 x86 make depends on s390 arch

This patch fixes s390 dependency for x86 Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig index 1330061..b699ed5 100644 --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig @@ -537,4 +537,6 @@ source "security/Kconfig" source

Re: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3 x86 make depends on s390 arch

On 11/30/07, Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:33:19PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > This patch fixes s390 dependency for x86 > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Deleting random parts of the

Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: fix kprobe_handler reenable preemption

v2.6.25 or v2.6.24 ? On Dec 20, 2007 2:45 PM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Masami Hiramatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Fix a preemption bug in kprobe_handler(). It has to call > > preempt_enable() before returning. > > thanks - i've applied all 3 kprobes patches from you. (fo

Re: [patch 3/3] Enable setting of IRQ-thread priorities from kernel cmdline. (repost:CC to LKML)

On 12/20/07, Remy Bohmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The RT-patch originally creates all its softirq-threads at > priority 50. Is it possible to run softirq-threads or IRQs as a non-realtime tasks in RT kernel. If yes, then how. Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. -- To unsubscribe fr

Re: [patch 2/3] Enable setting of IRQ-thread priorities from kernel cmdline (repost:CC to LKML)

On 12/20/07, Remy Bohmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > struct task_struct *thread; > + int rt_prio; > wait_queue_head_t wait_for_handler; int rt_prio or unsigned int rt_prio, which one is better. Thank you, Jaswinder SIngh. -- To u

Re: [patch 3/3] Enable setting of IRQ-thread priorities from kernel cmdline. (repost:CC to LKML)

user can switch it to NON-RT task then it will be good. Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please re

Re: [patch 3/3] Enable setting of IRQ-thread priorities from kernel cmdline. (repost:CC to LKML)

hello Juergen, On 12/20/07, Juergen Beisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 20 December 2007 13:45, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > So I am curious, if possible, user can switch softirq-threads or IRQs > > RT tasks to non-RT tasks for slow hardware or least important ha

Re: obsolete code must die

Cleanup is a nice idea , but Linux should support old hardware and should not affect them in any way. Jaswinder. - Original Message - From: "Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Linux kernel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 5:44 PM Subject: obsolete code must die > Anyon

Re: Download process for a "split kernel" (was: obsolete code must die)

> > Or as a simpler design, something like; > > * a copy of the kernel maintained in a CVS tree > * kernel download would pull down: > * the build script > * a file containing the list of filenames depended on by > each config option > * build script builds the conf

`smp_num_cpus' undeclared in 2.4.3

Dear linux-kernel mailing list, I am trying to build 2.4.3 for Intel machine . But i am getting this error when i say no to 'CONFIG_SMP' :- In file included from ksyms.c:17: /usr/src/linux-2.4.3/include/linux/kernel_stat.h:48: `smp_num_cpus' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/src/linu

Chat rooms for linux kernel developers

Dear linux kernel mailing list , Is there is any chat (IRC) for linux kernel developers . Thank you , Best Regards, Jaswinder. -- These are my opinions not 3Di. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majo

Re: Chat rooms for linux kernel developers

Dear Bill, Thank you very much for your reply and help. Best Regards, Jaswinder. - Original Message - From: "William Stearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jaswinder Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "ML-linux-kernel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent:

Interrupt Latency test for intel machine

- - PREEMPT-NONE43.576 4.190 4.190 119343 Voluntary PREEMPT 44.414 4.190 4.190 108694 PREEMPT low-latency 39.398 4.190 5.028 112717 Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. /* * Interrupt

Re: [2.6.23-rt3] NMI watchdog trace of deadlock

rs or filesystem source files. And when user will disable RT then these patches will again make problems. We need to find some better alternative. Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PR

_syscall0 exists or obsolete in 2.6

r obsolete in 2.6 linux. And I have noticed even if I commented _syscall0 macro, I do not get any errors so no body is using it , then why _syscall0 is in kernel header files and what is the substitute of _syscall0. Thanks for help, Jaswinder Singh. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line &qu

PREEMPT is messing with everyone

t code is also written in other important files. 70 to 80 % of this code is removed when compiled. but 20 to 30 % code left in binary kernel image. Why Linux kernel is wasting its resources which is not defined at all. Any solution ? Thank you, Best Regards, Jaswinder Singh. - To

Re: PREEMPT is messing with everyone

On 12/5/06, Michal Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jaswinder Singh wrote: > Hi, > > preempt stuff SHOULD only stay in #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMP_* , but it is > messing with everyone even though not defined. > > e.g. > > 1. linux-2.6.19/kernel/spinlock.c >

Re: [PATCH] let WARN_ON() output the condition

545e000) Stack: (0xc545ddcc to 0xc545e000) How to get rid of dequeue_task issue. Thanks Jaswinder Singh. On 12/6/06, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Horst H. von Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not just: > > WARN_ON(debug_locks_off()) > > here? Would

What happen when hangs !!

. Is this a deadlock. Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Support 2.4 modules features in 2.6

Hello, I want to support old 2.4 modules features in 2.6 kernel modules:- 1. no kernel source tree is required to build modules. 2. support modular plugins. 3. modules EXPORT by default. Is any patch available, or somebody working on it ? Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. - To unsubscribe from this

Re: Support 2.4 modules features in 2.6

On 12/12/06, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 19:36 +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > Hello, > > I want to support old 2.4 modules features in 2.6 kernel modules:- > 1. no kernel source tree is required to build modules. this is a 2.6 not

Re: Support 2.4 modules features in 2.6

On 12/12/06, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 20:41 +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > On 12/12/06, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 19:36 +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > > Hello, > > >

2.6.22.7 default kernel configuration

fault kernel configuration'. Is it made for developers's PC or for someone else. Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majord

realtime preemption performance difference

hardware:- 1. Interrupt latency 2. Task switching time 3. hard-realtime scheduling latency Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org

Re: 2.6.22.7 autoconf.h is screwed up

Dear Sam, On 9/24/07, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:50:43PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > 2.6.22.7's include/linux/autoconf.h is completely screwed up as > > compare to 2.6.10's autoconf.h . >

Re: realtime preemption performance difference

, Jaswinder Singh. On 9/25/07, hufey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/24/07, Jaswinder Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I want to check performance difference by using realtime preemption patch : > > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/li

2.6.22.7 autoconf.h is screwed up

E 1 #define CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HPT366 1 #define CONFIG_MTD_ABSENT_MODULE 1 Can you please let me know what is the idea behind this latest autoconf.h and who is creator of this ugly autoconf.h. Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ke

Re: 2.6.22.7 autoconf.h is screwed up

formatted it is very difficult to read and come to some conclusion. Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. On 9/24/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > 2.6.22.7's include/linux/autoconf.h is c

Re: 2.6.22.7 autoconf.h is screwed up

hello rday, On 9/24/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > > hello rday, > > > > In my view autoconf.h is the index of kernel you are using. By > > reading autoconf.h you will know what Architecture,

Re: 2.6.22.7 autoconf.h is screwed up

hello rday, On 9/24/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > > hello rday, > > > > On 9/24/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Jaswinder Singh wrote: &g

Re: OT: Open letter to the Linux World

automatically add/modify/delete drivers. 3. Software which can automatically add/modify/delete service packs. 4. Software which can automatically add/modify/delete functions. 5. Software which can automatically fix bugs. Thanks, -- Jaswinder Singh. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

[PATCH] mailbox: mailbox-test: avoid reading iomem twice

From: Jassi Brar Don't pass mmio region as source to print_hex_dump() and then again to memcpy_fromio(). Do it once and give print_hex_dump() the buffer we just read the data in. Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar --- drivers/mailbox/mailbox-test.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletion

[PATCH 1/3] perf x86: Fix missing email address

Cc: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput > ---  arch/x86/events/core.c | 2 +-  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c index 140d332..574d662 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/cor

[PATCH 0/3] perf: fix missing and old email address

This patchset fix my missing and old email address  0001-perf-x86-Fix-missing-email-address.patch  0002-perf-x86-Fix-missing-email-address.patch  0003-perf-tools-Fix-old-email-address.patch  arch/x86/events/core.c   | 2 +-  arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 2 +-  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c| 2

[PATCH 2/3] perf x86: Fix missing email address

Cc: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput > ---  arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 2 +-  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h index f7aaadf..84643b7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h +++ b/a

[PATCH 3/3] perf tools: Fix old email address

Cc: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput > ---  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 2 +-  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c index 59af5a8..dfb2159 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c +++ b/tools/p

[PATCH] perf tools: Fix old email address

jaswin...@kernel.org is old email and not in use. Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Namhyung Kim Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput --- tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion

Re: Warning in i915/intel_audio.c

rge with linus kernel. Thanks, -- Jaswinder Singh Rajput   > On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 17:08 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > > > Hello friends, > > > > I am getting multiple warnings in i915/intel_audio.c . I am > > attaching  > > dmesg, config and lsmod f

Re: Warning in i915/intel_audio.c

On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 16:23 +0200, Mika Kahola wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 19:20 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 14:44 +0200, Mika Kahola wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > This is a kn