ther infos),
Holger
Feb 24 21:37:08 nova kernel: printing eip:
Feb 24 21:37:08 nova kernel: c0126ca3
Feb 24 21:37:08 nova kernel: Oops: 0002
Feb 24 21:37:08 nova kernel: CPU:0
Feb 24 21:37:08 nova kernel: EIP:0010:[kmem_cache_free+99/176]
Feb 24 21:37:08 nova kernel: EFLAGS: 00010006
Feb 2
;> I'd like to keep that patch in stable, but I need to understand what
>> exactly is failing with it.
>
> Note that Holger ran into the same problem using a mainline (3.8-rc5)
> kernel.
Yup, which is why I'll try 3.8-rc7 first. Glad this has some attention. :)
-h
I have an embedded target (PXA255 based) where I have a nice
running kernel 2.6.15. Today I'm trying to get 2.6.24 running on
it. To get suspend/resume working, I had to add a patch from the
current development kernel, but after this things seemed to work
fine.
Unfortunately I can reproducibly tri
> I have an embedded target (PXA255 based) where I have a nice
> running kernel 2.6.15. Today I'm trying to get 2.6.24 running
> on it.
Whatever the problem is, sysfs works now flawlessly even after
a suspend/resume with v2.6.24-7284-g9ef9dc6.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
am kara wrote:
> I have a suggestion for the documentation of the
> kernel. Placing a comment about the function of each
> file and folder inside the kernel.
>
> This comment maybe short but saves a lot of time of a
> code reviewer.
I have a suggestion for the documentation of e-mails.
Use a pro
system
administrator or distributions enable this?
Regards,
Holger
PS: Please CC me as I am not on the list.
[1] http://www.dwd.de/AFD
[2]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/at.git;a=commitdiff;h=f4114656c3a6c6f6070e315ffdf940a49eda3279
[3]
https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/t
Hello Kees,
first, many thanks for trying to help!
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi Holger,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:13:40PM +, Holger Kiehl wrote:
as of linux 3.6 hardlink restrictions to the Linux VFS have been enabled
by default. This breaks the application AFD [1] of which
On Mon 11. Feb - 22:11:32, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Holger Macht wrote:
> >> It should be called via ata_acpi_{ap|dev}_notify() callbacks installed
> >> via acpi_install_notify_handler(). Can you add dump_stack() in the
> >> function and verify that it actually is b
On Mon 11. Feb - 20:16:38, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Holger Macht wrote:
> >> In the above example, even the reset sequence itself can cause hang if
> >> the hardware is implemented slightly differently. The reason why
> >> set_piomode() locks up but r
On Mon 11. Feb - 11:37:15, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Holger Macht wrote:
> > Calling ap->ops->set_piomode(ap, dev) on a device/controller which got
> > already removed, locks the system hard. Reproducibly on an X60 attached to
> > a dock station con
On Mon 11. Feb - 11:37:15, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Holger Macht wrote:
> > Calling ap->ops->set_piomode(ap, dev) on a device/controller which got
> > already removed, locks the system hard. Reproducibly on an X60 attached to
> > a dock station con
If a device/bay is inside a docking station, we need to register for dock
events additionally to bay events. If a dock event occurs, the dock driver
will call the appropriate handler (ata_acpi_ap_notify() or
ata_acpi_dev_notify()) for us.
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
On Mon 11. Feb - 22:11:32, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Holger Macht wrote:
> >> It should be called via ata_acpi_{ap|dev}_notify() callbacks installed
> >> via acpi_install_notify_handler(). Can you add dump_stack() in the
> >> function and verify that it actually is b
On Thu 14. Feb - 13:40:48, Holger Macht wrote:
> If a device/bay is inside a docking station, we need to register for dock
> events additionally to bay events. If a dock event occurs, the dock driver
> will call the appropriate handler (ata_acpi_ap_notify() or
> ata_acpi_dev_noti
On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:58:44 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.6.10 release.
Patched against 3.6.9/builds/works fine on 3 Gentoo ~x86 machines, two
generic i5/i7 boxes (one ATI with Evergreen chip) and an old T60 Thinkpad.
No borkage detecte
ource code.
Below I have added some additional information. Please CC me since I
am not subscribed to any of these lists. And please do not hesitate
to ask if more information is needed.
Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
Holger
Loading ixgbe module 3.15.1 without any options:
2013-06-14T10:01:15
Hello,
first, thank you for the quick help!
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:
-Original Message-
From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On
Behalf Of Holger Kiehl
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 4:50 AM
To: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net
Cc: linux
On Thu, 09 May 2013 15:31:23 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.8.13 release. There
This patchset broke my internet, with all sorts of weird effects like
Samba clients having problems to talk to the server and only partially
working DNS resol
but need some
pointers how to proceed. 3.7.10 is the last kernel that works (very well)
but is unmaintained, and it would be nice to move on to 3.8.5 to benefit
from ongoing bug fixes.
thanks!
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the bo
Hello,
I have been using the patches posted by Shaohua Li on 16th March 2012:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1203.2/00048.html
for several month on a very busy file server (serving 9 million files
with 5.3 TiB daily) without any problems.
Is there any chance that these patch
On Wed 20. Feb - 12:11:32, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Holger Macht wrote:
>> On Thu 14. Feb - 13:40:48, Holger Macht wrote:
>>> If a device/bay is inside a docking station, we need to register for dock
>>> events additionally to bay events. If a dock event occurs, the do
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 20:03:53 you wrote:
> Please, post .config and "ls -lR /proc/sys" output _before_
> suspend/resume.
Just a note: I don't use vanilla v2.6.24, but v2.6.24 plus a
bunch of patches on top of it. I minimized them and for v2.6.24,
this is the minimal number of patches ne
> Please, post .config and "ls -lR /proc/sys" output _before_
> suspend/resume.
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
# Linux kernel version: 2.6.24
# Thu Feb 7 11:43:09 2008
#
CONFIG_ARM=y
CONFIG_SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y
CONFIG_GENERI
> erp. We'd really like to know what we did to fix it, and then
> get that fix back into 2.6.24.x.
Agreed :-)
One more finding: after turning off CONFIG_SLUB and usng
CONFIG_SLAB instead, I cannot reproduce the bug.
Also, a quite bit Qt-Embedded 3.x programm survives without any
trouble the
Disable sysctl_check.c for embedded targets. This saves about about 11 kB
in .text and another 11 kB in .data on a PXA255 embedded platform.
Signed-off-by: Holger Schurig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux.orig/init/Kconfig
+++ linux/init/Kconfig
@@ -475,6 +475,17 @@
If unsure say
ally know what I'm doing because I don't have the
big picture. There's surely a better way to check if the device/controller
is still functional than calling ata_link_{online,offline}.
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
can tell the fix works; in my case I noticed repeatable hangs when
trying to "move files to the trash" in XFCE and these hangs are now gone.
Have not noticed any negative side effects either.
thanks
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel&qu
.8 and the stable trees, or do a revert of the whole
> series and just let 3.9 carry the full patchset.
Good news! This one does indeed work as expected - the device can be
removed and is gone for good. Upstream & Stable plz :)
thanks all!
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
cpi_dev_notify()) for us.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
> > index 9e8ec19..563ad72 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
> > +++
preferred solution would be having partition schemes as
loadable modules, too. Maybe I'll find some time to post the
approriate patch on this list soon...
Regards,
Holger Smolinski
IBM Germany
Linux/390 Kernel Development
Schönaicher Str.220, D-71032 Böblingen
>Reading patch-2.4.2
fill_geometry functions to make HDIO_GETGEO work like others.
Gruesse / Regards
Dr. Holger Smolinski
Linux for S/390 Design & Development,
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH, Schoenaicher Str. 220, D-71032 Boeblingen
Phone/FAX: +49 7031 16 (x902) - 4652/3456
ibmpart.diff
() at ../sysdeps/generic/libc-start.c:93
I have this system now for several years and it has always been very
stabel under 2.2.x. In fact this is my first filesystem corruption.
If I forget anything or more information is required please tell me.
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
Dynamic linker ldd (GNU libc) 2.1.2
Procps 2.0.4
Mount 2.10r
Net-tools 1.53
Console-tools 1999.03.02
Sh-utils 2.0
Modules Loaded w83781d sensors i2c-piix4 i2c-isa i2c-core
Holger
-
To unsubs
early
useless. After the test is done everything is back to normal.
The same behavior was observed under 2.2.18.
Holger
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
static void create_files(int, int, char *),
delete_files
nd you correctly: with 48MB you do get
corruption and with 192MB not? And if you do see corruption are you
using SW Raid, SMP?
With 1 I also had no problem, my next step was 5.
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
k.
Then I tried with 1 files and "mem=64m" and I get the corruption.
So if I conclude correctly: we both have SMP + ext2 and you do not have
SW raid and I do, that its definetly a SW raid bug?
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
can now reproduce this problem
within 10 minutes.
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
ve an raid 5 array - SMP+ext2 without
> raid5 is ok.
>
> Holger, what's your ext2 block size, and do you run with a degraded
> array?
>
No, I do not have a degraded array and the blocksize of ext2 is 4096. Here is
what /proc/mdstat looks like:
afdbench@florix:~/test
Hello
Why is LINK_MAX in linux only 127? The values for other operating
systems is as follows:
solaris 32767
hpux 32767
irix 3
In reallity LINK_MAX for ext2 is 32000, so why is this only 127?
Please cc to me since I am not on this list.
Thanks,
Holger
-
To unsubscribe
Hmm, I seem to have missed the changelog posting for ac17. However, I
noticed that the overclocked CPU detection code was dropped between ac16
and ac17. Since the changelog did not mention it - was the feature
dropped intentionally, and if so, why?
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
sad to see it go again)
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
I also noticed that operations on a lot of files (like scanning for all
files in a filesystem as done by updatedb) got really slow with the 2.4
vfat fs, with a very high percentage (in the 90s) of CPU time attributed
to "system". Has anybody else noticed this?
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from
sk reads: 64 MB in 2.30 seconds = 27.83 MB/sec
the kernel is 2.4.2ac18 btw. i know its not the most recent, but that
shouldn't matter. this behaviour has been there for a long time. i am
not even sure if this was ever any different.
holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line &
gether.
Having the root fs in the outermost partition might give slightly faster
transfers, but slightly longer seeks to get there.
> [root@via DiskPerf-1.0.3]# ./DiskPerf /dev/hda
Is that an unreleased version? kernel.org still has 1.0.1.
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line &quo
Russell King wrote:
> Is anyone else using NTP with 2.4.2, and if so, are you synchronising
> properly?
Works for me. (RH7, ntp-4.0.99j-7, Kernel 2.4.2-ac23 - but worked with
plain 2.4.2, too)
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
Jan 23 00:53:50 cube last message repeated 16 times
This happens under a very high load (120) and is properly not raid related.
What's the meaning of this?
Thanks,
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
rt from
DOS or a Windows reboot: If the screen stays black, the chip has an
error."
As far as I understand it, the problem is only affecting "warm reboots".
And I couldn't care less about warm reboots - my machines usually run
24/7 :)
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 15:40 +, Holger Kiehl wrote:
No I did not get it. Can you please send it to me or tell me where I can
download it?
OK, since this has stalled, how about trying a different approach.
If you apply the attached patch it will
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 21:12 +, Holger Kiehl wrote:
drivers/message/fusion/mptspi.c:505: error: unknown field
â..get_hold_mcsâ.. specified in initializer
drivers/message/fusion/mptspi.c:505: warning: excess elements in struct
initializer
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Moore, Eric Dean wrote:
On Sunday, August 07, 2005 8:30 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 05:59 +, Holger Kiehl wrote:
Thanks, removing those it compiles fine. This patch also
solves my problem,
here the output of dmesg:
Well ... the transport class
ystems
are unmounted the fusion driver tells me that it puts the two controllers
in power save mode. Then kernel whants to flush the SCSI disks but
hangs forever. This does not happen when doing a reboot.
Holger
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
back
SCSI device sdj: 143552136 512-byte hdwr sectors (73499 MB)
SCSI device sdj: drive cache: write back
sdj: sdj1
Attached scsi disk sdj at scsi5, channel 0, id 3, lun 0
Anything else I can try or provide?
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux
No I did not get it. Can you please send it to me or tell me where I can
download it?
Thanks,
Holger
--
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Moore, Eric Dean wrote:
I provided an application called getspeed as an attachment
in the email I sent last Friday. Did you receive that, or do
I need to resend? If
Hello
I have a system with the following setup:
Board is Tyan S4882 with AMD 8131 Chipset
4 Opterons 848 (2.2GHz)
8 GB DDR400 Ram (2GB for each CPU)
1 onboard Symbios Logic 53c1030 dual channel U320 controller
2 SATA disks put together as a SW Raid1 for system, swap and spare
with "blockdev --setra" setings?
Yes, I did play a little bit with it but this only changed read performance,
it made no measurable difference when writting.
Thanks,
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [E
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Al Boldi wrote:
Holger Kiehl wrote:
Why do I only get 247 MB/s for writting and 227 MB/s for reading (from the
bonnie++ results) for a Raid0 over 8 disks? I was expecting to get nearly
three times those numbers if you take the numbers from the individual
disks.
What limit
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 06:20:56PM +, Holger Kiehl wrote:
Hello
I have a system with the following setup:
Board is Tyan S4882 with AMD 8131 Chipset
4 Opterons 848 (2.2GHz)
8 GB DDR400 Ram (2GB for each CPU)
1 onboard Symbios
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31 2005, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:06:21PM +, Holger Kiehl wrote:
How does one determine the PCI-X bus speed?
Usually only the card (in your case the Symbios SCSI controller) can
tell. If it does, it'll be
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:06:21PM +, Holger Kiehl wrote:
How does one determine the PCI-X bus speed?
Usually only the card (in your case the Symbios SCSI controller) can
tell. If it does, it'll be most likely in 'dmesg'.
Ther
try my
block tracing stuff so we can see what is going on at the queue level.
But lets gather some more info first, since it requires testing -mm.
Ok, please then just tell me what I must do.
Thanks,
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
t
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Nick Piggin wrote:
Holger Kiehl wrote:
3236497 total 1.4547
2507913 default_idle 52248.1875
158752 shrink_zone 43.3275
121584 copy_user_generic_c 3199.5789
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31 2005, Holger Kiehl wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Jens Axboe wrote:
Nothing sticks out here either. There's plenty of idle time. It smells
like a driver issue. Can you try the same dd test, but read from the
drives instead? Use a b
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31 2005, Holger Kiehl wrote:
# ./oread /dev/sdX
and it will read 128k chunks direct from that device. Run on the same
drives as above, reply with the vmstat info again.
Using kernel 2.6.12.5 again, here the results:
[snip]
Ok, reads as
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Holger Kiehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Jens Axboe wrote:
Full vmstat session can be found under:
Have you got iostat? iostat -x 10 might be interesting to see
for a period while it is going.
The following is the
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Nick Piggin wrote:
Holger Kiehl wrote:
meminfo.dump:
MemTotal: 8124172 kB
MemFree: 23564 kB
Buffers: 7825944 kB
Cached: 19216 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 25708 kB
Inactive: 7835548 kB
HighTotal
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Holger Kiehl wrote:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Nick Piggin wrote:
Holger Kiehl wrote:
meminfo.dump:
MemTotal: 8124172 kB
MemFree: 23564 kB
Buffers: 7825944 kB
Cached: 19216 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 25708 kB
all I'd say it's not the card or the driver..
hth,
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:15:30 +0100
Holger Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We discovered performance degradation with dbench when using kernel
2.6.23 compared to kernel 2.6.22.
In our case we booted a Linux in a IBM System z9 LPAR with 256MB of
ram with 4 CPU
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:44:26 +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Holger Hoffstaette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...]
>> Maybe turning off sendfile or NAPI just lead to random success - so far
>> it really looks like tso on the r8169 is the common cause.
>
> TSO on the r8169
ems during the week and might be able to contribute some findings.
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
or off triggers/untriggers the
corruption reliably. I will try 2.6.22.x over the weekend, and before I
bother lkml with dmesg/.config etc. I wanted to fish for initial thoughts.
thanks
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a me
ate broken files with tso and the unique patterns that Eric
suggested, if that helps tracking down the tso corruption.
thank you!
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at h
Btw, the r8169 has NAPI enabled.
kernel config:
http://hoho.dyndns.org/~holger/dist/kernel-config-x86-2.6.23.9
dmesg:
http://hoho.dyndns.org/~holger/dist/dmesg
lspci -vv:
http://hoho.dyndns.org/~holger/dist/lspci
thanks
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
ecent regression
in .23/.24.
All files can be found here:
http://hoho.dyndns.org/~holger/dist/r8169-tso/
I will gladly try out any other tweaks but need some guidance as I don't
know what exactly to change - maybe without NAPI for the r8169?
thank you
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:00:03 +0100, Holger Hoffstaette wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:26:54 -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
>
>> Could the corruption be seen in a tcpdump trace prior to transmission
>> (ie taken on the sender) or was it only seen after the data passed out
>>
501.371.64 -20.12%
541.281.66 -29.60%
62 1.5 1.69 -12.84%
regards
Holger Wolf
--
To unsubscribe from th
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 23:54:29 +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Holger Hoffstaette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...]
>> Should I file this in bugzilla?
>
> Yes.
Thanks for responding - will do. I verified with 2.6.24-rc4 (same bug) and
have some new information about this.
Despit
> BTW: I'm not so sure where this patch should go to.
To <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, as Dan Williams (libertas
maintainer) monitors this list.
The wireless development tree is wireless-2.6, branch everything.
You patch doesn't apply to this tree currently, but it's easy to
fix. I'll bring it in shape
I have a case where scripts/checkpatch.pl returns a false error.
First, here is the code:
static int lbs_scan_add_rates_tlv(u8 *tlv)
{
int i;
struct mrvlietypes_ratesparamset *rate_tlv =
(struct mrvlietypes_ratesparamset *) tlv;
rate_tlv->header.type = cp
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 03:19:43 +0100, Holger Hoffstaette wrote:
> I have now gone back to enable TSO since vsftp with sendfile really seems
> to be the only app that causes this. I have simply set it to
> use_sendfile=NO and no corruption occurs at all; the machine is stable and
> f
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:44:26 +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Holger Hoffstaette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...]
>> Maybe turning off sendfile or NAPI just lead to random success - so far
>> it really looks like tso on the r8169 is the common cause.
>
> TSO on the r8169
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Holger Kiehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
On a four CPU Opteron compiling the Fusion-MPT as module gives much better
performance when compiling it in, here some bonnie++ results:
Version 1.03 --Sequential Output-- --Sequential
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Holger, this problem remains unresolved, does it not? Have you done any
more experimentation?
I must say that something funny seems to be happening here. I have two
MPT-based Dell machines, neither of which is
remove this code as long we know it is working and
continously tested by the dbox2 folks.
Instead it may make sense to move the dbox2 sources into the mainstream
source tree. Andreas, what do you think?
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel&quo
ore/dvb_demux.c: dvb_dmx_swfilter_packet
dvb_dmx_swfilter_packet() should remain exported to the public,
accessing this directly makes sense for some architectures.
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mor
problem and want to solve it.
Holger
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch removes the bouncing email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] of
Alex Woods.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/media/dvb/ttusb-dec/ttusb_dec.c |4 ++--
drivers/media/dvb/ttusb-dec/ttusbdecfe.c |2 +-
d
Hello
This makes IPMI watchdog more verbose during initialization. It prints the
values of timeout and if nowayout is set or not. Currently there is no way
to see what these values are, onced initialzed.
Please check if this is the correct place to put the printk.
Holger--- linux-2.6.10/drivers
been blacklisted, however then I don't grok why it's still in the config and
the modules.usbmap).
Regards
Holger Klawitter (not subscribed)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More major
should be=9031. Hence my Zarus is being recognized as C-750/760
(which is fine as 760 and 860 only differ in memsize).
Regards
Holger Klawitter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo inf
might want to examine upx
(http://wildsau.idv.uni-linz.ac.at/mfx/upx.html). The kernel image
compression is still experimental, but already usable. kernels tend to
get ~100 K smaller compared to the usual gzip compressed bzImage.
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linu
Hello
Some time ago Ben Greear has posted a patch to include VLAN support into
the 2.4 kernel. I and many others are using this patch with great success
and without any problems for a very long time. What is the reason that
this patch is not included into the kernel?
Thanks,
Holger
-
To
nce a day at
most. Mine usually run until the next kernel upgrade. But then again,
I'm not a kernel hacker, so this is to be taken more as a users point of
view.
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECT
/sec, offset 31.
(scsi0:0:4:0) Synchronous at 80.0 Mbyte/sec, offset 31.
Could someone please tell me from these messages what is wrong with my
SCSI-subsystem?
Thanks,
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
;ll take a look if
I get time, but you are looking for a pci module declaration which has a
remove function that isnt marked __devexit_p() when the function it
calls is
I'll fix this in the linux-dvb CVS repository, it will be included in
the next 2.5 patchset.
Holger
--
Info:
To uns
(dev->attach (i2c) == 0) {
are you sure? MOD_CAN_QUERY() and __MOD_INC_USE_COUNT() are 2.4 macros,
they are deprecated now. The compatibility fake is implemented in
compat.h. Could you please check this again and tell me what exactly the
problem is?
Holger
--
Info:
To unsubscribe s
. Controller is a
Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI.
Why is there such a large difference?
Holger
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
t we do here, too. The only exceptions: Our mail server
(needs to deliver mail, even to broken sites) and our web proxy server
(also needs to connect to broken sites sometimes). Everything else is
ECN enabled. And this is the approach I'd suggest to anybody running 2.4
servers.
Holger
-
To unsu
> drivers/net/wireless/libertas/if_cs.c |2 +-
ACK
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
e, now it always says laptop is plugged in and does not
> show any battery status. Any /proc changes in this release?
kpowersave just reflects what HAL thinks, and HAL reflects what the kernel
thinks. So please post the content of /proc/acpi/ac_adapter/AC/state when
AC is not plugged in to figure ou
he 'docked' file,
which is obviously bad.
Thanks,
Holger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
1 - 100 of 304 matches
Mail list logo