GRSecurity goes full commercial, no more free testing patches, threatens
programmer trying to port.
(*1) https://lwn.net/Articles/723169/
(*2)
https://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/software/general-linux-open-source/948623-grsecurity-kernel-patches-will-no-longer-be-free-to-the-public?page=1
(*
Here is a song recorded in contemplation of the current GRSecurity
situation (And the violation of the terms under-which the linux kernel
is licensed for modification and distribution (that is: their implicit
(or perhaps even explicit but by another channel other than the writing)
addition of a
The license grant the Linux Kernel is distributed under disallows the
imposition of additional terms.
The making of an understanding that the derivative work must not be
redistributed (lest there be retaliation) is the imposition of an
additional term.
The communication of this threat is the mom
Some Opensource Songs, Including one on GRSecurity's copyright Violation
This song is about GRSecurity's violation of Linus et al's copyright**:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYnhI3wUej8
(A Boat Sails Away 2016 17)
Here's a synthwave song with a kind-of beat:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCbeOsqwUEE
(KMS2
Why is everyone comfortable with GRSecurity violating the terms
underwhich the Linux Kernel is licensed out?
They are preventing redistribution of their derivative work.
The Law is not a Genie, it is not a computer, and Judges are not fools.
The license grant the Linux Kernel is distributed un
The license grant the Linux Kernel is distributed under disallows the
imposition of additional terms.
The making of an understanding that the derivative work must not be
redistributed (lest there be retaliation) is the imposition of an
additional term.
The communication of this threat is the mom
Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly
violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?
He is also violating the license grant, Courts would not be fooled by
his scheme to prevent redistribution.
The license grant the Linux Kernel is distributed unde
Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly
violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?
He is also violating the license grant, Courts would not be fooled by
his scheme to prevent redistribution.
The license grant the Linux Kernel is distributed unde
From a legal standpoint the pulling of the public patches is
significant.
Before then there was a cause of action due to the imposition of an
additional term, but
since the rights-holders could still access the derivative work it may
have been a moot point to them.
Now that additional no-red
Some Free/Libre/Opensource Songs for all of you here working on the
LINUX KERNEL!, Including one on GRSecurity's copyright Violation
This song is about GRSecurity's violation of Linus et al's copyright**:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYnhI3wUej8
(A Boat Sails Away 2016 17)
Here's a synthwave song w
Anyone enjoying? Give me feedback. The audacity zips are on the project
page.
I like to make OPENSOURCE MUSICK BROOO
On 2017-06-15 16:39, aconcernedfoss...@airmail.cc wrote:
Some Free/Libre/Opensource Songs for all of you here working on the
LINUX KERNEL!, Including one on GRSec
Thanks for doing this porting work. Look forward to using GRSecurity/PAX
features on ARM eventually. ARM's taking over as we know. x86 is almost
done.
On 2017-06-15 16:42, Salvatore Mesoraca wrote:
Some programs need to generate part of their code at runtime. Luckily
enough, in some cases they
The license under-which the linux kernel is distributed forbids, in it's
text, the imposition of additional terms.
GRSecurity has, in-fact, successfully imposed a no-distribution term.
Even if it was a wink and a nod or an implicit threat the courts would
not be blind to them. Additional terms
I'm not spamming anyone.
I am trying to:
1) Locate rights-holders to the linux kernel.
2) Inform them of very recent developments concerning their copyrighted
work.
3) Inform them of their rights.
Many programmers operate under the false notion that the terms of a
license can be circumvented b
Original Message
Subject: Re: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is
blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux
Kernel?
Date: 2017-06-15 19:46
From: aconcernedfoss...@airmail.cc
To: st...@guppylog.com, "Ubuntu user technical support
I'm just informing you that I am going to be filing a suit against you
for
1) Putting my character a negative false light
2) Libel (communication to a third party a derogatory false statement)
Perhaps your employer will indemnify you Mrs Lockwood.
Thus; I will (as you requested) "bring it".
On
16 matches
Mail list logo
