On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 12:39 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> From: Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [PATCH] iwlwifi3945/4965 - fix rate control algo reference leak
>
> This patch does fix rate control algo reference leak in case
> if network device has been failed to register. In thi
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 09:56 -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>
> Any chance of getting LEDs support re-added to this driver,
> perhaps in the 2.6.25 timeframe?
I'd also like to see it happen. Stay tuned.
Thanks,
-yi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body o
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 23:20 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch adds __dev{init,exit} annotations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ACK.
Thanks,
-yi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 19:41 +0900, Joonwoo Park wrote:
> [net/wireless/iwlwifi] : iwlwifi 3945 Fix race conditional panic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonwoo Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
> index 4
On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 15:58 +0100, Miguel Botón wrote:
> This patch removes a redundant declaration of 'iwl3945_priv' and
> 'iwl4965_priv' structs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Boton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ACK.
Thanks,
-yi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
t
Hi Joonwoo,
We already did something similiar in our code base. Could you please
take a look at this patch?
http://intellinuxwireless.org/repos/?p=iwlwifi.git;a=commitdiff;h=57aa02255e9d7be5e2494683fc2793bd1d0707e2
Thanks,
-yi
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 20:02 +0900, Joonwoo Park wrote:
> Eleminiate t
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 10:38 +0900, Joonwoo Park wrote:
> I should have checked code base, it's my fault.
> it's seems very similar, but I could not made build unfortunately.
> Can you introduce to me how to build it please?
>
> my build error is here:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/SRC/DRIVERS/iwlwifi $
>
-help---
> This option will enable spectrum measurement for the iwl4965 driver.
Thanks, but there is another one.
Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/Kconfig
b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/Kconfig
index c91e5f9..66ca942 100644
---
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:57 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Thanks. This is a bug in iwlwifi.
>
> The problem is actually another case where my workqueue debugging with
> lockdep is triggering a warning :))
>
> Here's the thing:
>
> iwl3945_cancel_deferred_work does
>
> cancel_delayed_work_sync
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 20:49 +0100, Miguel Botón wrote:
> Remove unnecesary code in iwl3945 and iwl4965 drivers.
>
> "final_mode" variable is already initialized with the value of the
> "mode" variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Boton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ACK. Or you can do "u32 uninitialized_var
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 01:52 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> tcpspray -n 1 -b 1000 10.0.0.2
>
> Oct 31 01:42:56 amd kernel: iwl3945: Microcode SW error detected.
> Restarting 0x8208.
> Oct 31 01:42:56 amd kernel: iwl3945: Error Reply type 0x0005 cmd
> REPLY_TX (0x1C) seq 0x02C7 ser 0x
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 01:12 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> iwl3945: Microcode SW error detected. Restarting 0x8208.
> iwl3945: Start IWL Error Log Dump:
> iwl3945: Status: 0x00010172, Config: count: 1
> iwl3945: Desc Time asrtPC blink2 ilink1 nmiPC Line
> iwl3945: SYSAS
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 14:32 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> int iwl_param_disable; /* def: enable radio */
> int iwl_param_antenna; /* def: 0 = both antennas (use diversity)
> */
> int iwl_param_hwcrypto; /* def: using software encryption */
> -int iwl_param_qos_enable = 1;
> +s
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 15:05 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> prefix all symbols with iwl3945_ and thus allow building the driver
> into the kernel. Also remove all the useless default statements in
> Kconfig while we're at it.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Did you
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 00:38 -0500, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> When rounding a relative timeout we need to use
> round_jiffies_relative().
ACK.
John, please apply this patch to wireless-2.6. Thanks.
-yi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 19:51 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch fixes two off-by-one errors resulting in array overflows
> spotted by the Coverity checker.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ACK.
John, please apply.
Thanks,
-yi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 09:26 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> ping.
Pong.
Sorry for the late response, I just come back from vacation. I'm looking
at your patches. Basically I agree with them. But I also have some other
patches pending. So I need to merge them together into one patch series
and
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 19:03 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> You bring up a good point, it would be good to hear the opinion from
> one of the wireless people on this since they have their own
> multiqueue scheduler in the wireless-dev tree.
The one in the wireless-dev is pretty much like this
On 8/28/2018 3:09 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting yixin zhu (2018-08-08 01:52:20)
On 8/8/2018 1:50 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Songjun Wu (2018-08-02 20:02:21)
+ struct clk *clk;
+ int idx;
+
+ for (idx = 0; idx < nr_clks; idx++, osc++) {
+ if (!osc->dt_fr
+}
+
+CLK_OF_DECLARE(intel_grx500_cgu, "intel,grx500-cgu", grx500_clk_init);
Any reason a platform driver can't be used instead of CLK_OF_DECLARE()?
It provides CPU clock which is used in early boot stage.
Ok. What is the CPU clock doing in early boot stage? Some sort of timer
frequency? If th
On 9/1/2018 1:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Zhu, Yi Xin (2018-08-28 23:56:22)
On 8/28/2018 3:09 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting yixin zhu (2018-08-08 01:52:20)
On 8/8/2018 1:50 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
+/* clock flags definition */
+#define CLOCK_FLAG_VAL_INITBIT(16)
+#define
On 9/1/2018 1:13 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Zhu, Yi Xin (2018-08-29 03:34:26)
+}
+
+CLK_OF_DECLARE(intel_grx500_cgu, "intel,grx500-cgu", grx500_clk_init);
Any reason a platform driver can't be used instead of CLK_OF_DECLARE()?
It provides CPU clock which is used in e
22 matches
Mail list logo
