c7 83 c0 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0 ff
[50510.243685] RIP [] bt_accept_unlink+0x47/0xa0 [bluetooth]
[50510.243737] RSP
[50510.243758] CR2: 01a8
[50510.249457] ---[ end trace bb984f932c4e3ab3 ]---
Signed-off-by: Yichen Zhao
---
net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 18 +-
re calling bt_accept_unlink
in teardown_cb. This is still conditional locking, but around a smaller block
of code. Is it safe to unlock a zapped sock?
* Use RCU for handling accept_q. Is this appropriate?
Please let me know what you think.
Regards,
Yichen Zhao
] RSP
[50510.243758] CR2: 01a8
[50510.249457] ---[ end trace bb984f932c4e3ab3 ]---
Signed-off-by: Yichen Zhao
---
net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
index a3bffd1..a542b99
3 matches
Mail list logo