[PATCH] sched: fix NULL pointer issue in pick_next_entity()

2017-07-31 Thread Yafang Shao
;left' and 'curr' could both be NULL, then this will cause NULL pointer issue. In order to fix this issue, we just need return NULL under the condition that both 'left' and 'curr' are NULL, meaning that no entity available. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- kerne

[PATCH] scheduler: enhancement to show_state_filter

2017-08-07 Thread Yafang Shao
ecifically. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 2 +- include/linux/sched.h | 1 + include/linux/sched/debug.h | 6 -- kernel/sched/core.c | 7 --- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c ind

[PATCH v2] scheduler: enhancement to show_state_filter

2017-08-07 Thread Yafang Shao
ecifically. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 2 +- include/linux/sched.h | 1 + include/linux/sched/debug.h | 6 -- kernel/sched/core.c | 7 --- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c ind

Re: [PATCH v2] scheduler: enhancement to show_state_filter

2017-08-08 Thread Yafang Shao
08, 2017 at 08:53:10PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: >> Sometimes we want to get tasks in TASK_RUNNING sepcifically, >> instead of dump all tasks. >> For example, when the loadavg are high, we want to dump >> tasks in TASK_RUNNING and TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, which contribute &g

Re: [PATCH v2] scheduler: enhancement to show_state_filter

2017-08-08 Thread Yafang Shao
ks (with a new key, or something else). But in order to introduce the new key, we should made this change first. After this change got approved, I will try to make some changes in SysRq. Thanks Yafang 2017-08-08 18:24 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra : > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:50:23PM +0800, Yafa

Re: [PATCH v2] scheduler: enhancement to show_state_filter

2017-08-08 Thread Yafang Shao
Okay. I will submit the whole work in a new patch later. 2017-08-08 19:04 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra : > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 06:36:41PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: >> After this change got approved, I will try to make some changes in SysRq. > > No, that's not how it works. Show the whole work.

Re: [PATCH v2] scheduler: enhancement to show_state_filter

2017-08-08 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-08-08 19:24 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra : > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at > 07:07:26PM +0800, Yafang Shao

[PATCH v3] scheduler: enhancement to show_state_filter and SysRq

2017-08-08 Thread Yafang Shao
he tasks in running state is that dumping both blocked tasks and running tasks is more helpful than dump blocked tasks only. That's an improvement. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 15 --- include/linux/sched.h | 1 + include/linux/sched/deb

Re: [PATCH v3] scheduler: enhancement to show_state_filter and SysRq

2017-08-09 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-08-09 15:43 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra : > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 06:31:28PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: >> Sometimes we want to get tasks in TASK_RUNNING sepcifically, >> instead of dump all tasks. >> >> For example, when the loadavg are high, we want to dump &

Re: [PATCH v3] scheduler: enhancement to show_state_filter and SysRq

2017-08-09 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-08-09 17:09 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra : > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:01:49PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: >> 2017-08-09 15:43 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra : >> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 06:31:28PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: >> >> Sometimes we want to get task

Re: [PATCH] sched: fix NULL pointer issue in pick_next_entity()

2017-08-01 Thread Yafang Shao
. > You diff is broken, this is very much not the clear_buddies() function. You're right. it is in pick_next_entity(). 2017-08-01 16:38 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra : > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 06:01:56PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: >> When we select CFQ as the scheduler, in function pick_n

Re: [PATCH] sched: fix NULL pointer issue in pick_next_entity()

2017-08-01 Thread Yafang Shao
Hi Peter, 2017-08-01 17:12 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra : > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:57:43PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: >> > And how would that happen? We only call pick_next_entity(.curr=NULL) >> > when we _know_ cfs_rq->nr_running. >> >> It crashed my machine

[PATCH v2 net-next] net/tcp: trace all TCP/IP state transition with tcp_set_state tracepoint

2017-12-02 Thread Yafang Shao
newstate) When do TCP/IP state transition, we should use these two helpers or use tcp_set_state() other than assigning a value to sk_state directly. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- v2: test --- include/net/tcp.h | 2 ++ net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 6 +++--- net/ipv4

[PATCH v4 net-next] net/tcp: trace all TCP/IP state transition with tcp_set_state tracepoint

2017-12-06 Thread Yafang Shao
); When do TCP/IP state transition, we should use these two helpers or use tcp_set_state() other than assigning a value to sk_state directly. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao Acked-by: Song Liu Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner --- v3->v4: Do not trace DCCP socket v2->v3: Per suggestion from M

[PATCH v5 net-next] net/tcp: trace all TCP/IP state transition with tcp_set_state tracepoint

2017-12-07 Thread Yafang Shao
); When do TCP/IP state transition, we should use these two helpers or use tcp_set_state() other than assigning a value to sk_state directly. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao Acked-by: Song Liu Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- v4->v5: Trace only TCP sockets, whate

[PATCH] net/tcp: introduce TRACE_EVENT for TCP/IPv4 state transition

2017-11-08 Thread Yafang Shao
__sk_state_store(struct sock *sk, int newstate) When do TCP/IPv4 state transition, we should use these two helpers or use tcp_set_state() instead of assign a value to sk_state directly. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- include/net/tcp.h | 16 include/trace/events/tcp.h

Re: [PATCH] net/tcp: introduce TRACE_EVENT for TCP/IPv4 state transition

2017-11-08 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-11-09 14:43 GMT+08:00 Alexei Starovoitov : > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 02:01:38PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: >> With this newly introduced TRACE_EVENT, it will be very easy to minotor >> TCP/IPv4 state transition. >> >> A new TRACE_SYSTEM named tcp is added, in w

[PATCH net-next 1/2] net/tcp: track all TCP/IP state transition in tcp_set_state

2017-11-09 Thread Yafang Shao
, int newstate) When do TCP/IP state transition, we should use these two helpers or use tcp_set_state() other than assigning a value to sk_state directly. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- include/net/tcp.h | 16 net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 6 +++--- net

[PATCH net-next 2/2] tcp: handle TCP_TIME_WAIT/TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV in tcp_set_state tracepoint

2017-11-09 Thread Yafang Shao
When TCP connetion in TCP_TIME_WAIT or TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV state, it can't get the sport/dport/saddr/daddr from inet_sock. trace_tcp_set_state may be called when the oldstate in these two states. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- include/trace/events/tcp.h | 33 ++-

Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] tcp: handle TCP_TIME_WAIT/TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV in tcp_set_state tracepoint

2017-11-09 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-11-09 22:58 GMT+08:00 Eric Dumazet : > On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 06:52 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> Wow. >> >> >> Since all three variants of sockets (full sockets, request sockets, >> timewait sockets) are all hashed into ehash table these days, they all >> have the fields at the same offset >

Re: [PATCH] tcp: Export to userspace the TCP state names for the trace events

2017-11-09 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-11-10 8:57 GMT+08:00 Steven Rostedt : > > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" > > The TCP trace events (specifically tcp_set_state), maps emums to symbol > names via __print_symbolic(). But this only works for reading trace events > from the tracefs trace files. If perf or trace-cmd were to recor

Re: [PATCH] tcp: Export to userspace the TCP state names for the trace events

2017-11-10 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-11-10 15:07 GMT+00:00 Steven Rostedt : > On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:56:06 +0800 > Yafang Shao wrote: > >> Could the macro tcp_state_name() be renamed ? >> If is included in include/net/tcp.h, it will > > Ideally, you don't want to include trace/events/*.h headers

Re: [PATCH] mm/shmem: set default tmpfs size according to memcg limit

2017-11-17 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-11-18 1:35 GMT+08:00 Shakeel Butt : > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Yafang Shao wrote: >> 2017-11-18 0:45 GMT+08:00 Roman Gushchin : >>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:20:40AM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: >>>> 2017-11-17 23:55 GMT+08:00 Roman Gushchin : >>>

Re: [PATCH] mm/shmem: set default tmpfs size according to memcg limit

2017-11-17 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-11-18 1:49 GMT+08:00 Shakeel Butt : > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Yafang Shao wrote: >> 2017-11-18 1:35 GMT+08:00 Shakeel Butt : >>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Yafang Shao wrote: >>>> 2017-11-18 0:45 GMT+08:00 Roman Gushchin : >>>>

[PATCH v2 net-next] net/tcp: trace all TCP/IP state transition with tcp_set_state tracepoint

2017-11-18 Thread Yafang Shao
newstate) When do TCP/IP state transition, we should use these two helpers or use tcp_set_state() other than assigning a value to sk_state directly. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- include/net/tcp.h | 2 ++ net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 6 +++--- net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 2

Re: [PATCH] mm/shmem: set default tmpfs size according to memcg limit

2017-11-20 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-11-20 20:04 GMT+08:00 Michal Hocko : > On Fri 17-11-17 09:49:54, Shakeel Butt wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Yafang Shao wrote: > [...] >> > Of couse that is the best way. >> > But we can not ensue all applications will do it. >> > That&#

Re: [PATCH] mm/shmem: set default tmpfs size according to memcg limit

2017-11-20 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-11-20 20:39 GMT+08:00 Michal Hocko : > On Mon 20-11-17 20:16:15, Yafang Shao wrote: >> 2017-11-20 20:04 GMT+08:00 Michal Hocko : >> > On Fri 17-11-17 09:49:54, Shakeel Butt wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Yafang Shao wrote: >> > [...

[PATCH] net/tcp: track all ipv4/tcp state transition in tcp_set_state

2017-11-07 Thread Yafang Shao
the whole tcp lifespans with kprobe or ftrace easily. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 6 +++--- net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c

Re: [PATCH] net/tcp: track all ipv4/tcp state transition in tcp_set_state

2017-11-08 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-11-08 14:51 GMT+08:00 David Miller : > From: Yafang Shao > Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 18:36:28 +0800 > >> When I hooked the function tcp_set_state with kprobe to track the ipv4/tcp >> state transistion, I found state transition from TCP_LISTEN to TCP_SYN_RECV >> is

Re: [PATCH v5 net-next] net/tcp: trace all TCP/IP state transition with tcp_set_state tracepoint

2017-12-07 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-12-08 4:02 GMT+08:00 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner : > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 02:10:42PM +0000, Yafang Shao wrote: >> The TCP/IP transition from TCP_LISTEN to TCP_SYN_RECV and some other >> transitions are not traced with tcp_set_state tracepoint. >> >> In order to tr

Re: [PATCH v5 net-next] net/tcp: trace all TCP/IP state transition with tcp_set_state tracepoint

2017-12-07 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-12-08 9:41 GMT+08:00 Yafang Shao : > 2017-12-08 4:02 GMT+08:00 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner : >> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 02:10:42PM +0000, Yafang Shao wrote: >>> The TCP/IP transition from TCP_LISTEN to TCP_SYN_RECV and some other >>> transitions are not traced wi

Re: [PATCH v5 net-next] net/tcp: trace all TCP/IP state transition with tcp_set_state tracepoint

2017-12-08 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-12-08 23:42 GMT+08:00 David Miller : > From: Yafang Shao > Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:40:23 +0800 > >> It will looks like these, >> >> if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP) >> __tcp_set_state(newsk, TCP_SYN_RECV); >> else >>

Re: [PATCH v5 net-next] net/tcp: trace all TCP/IP state transition with tcp_set_state tracepoint

2017-12-08 Thread Yafang Shao
2017-12-09 0:28 GMT+08:00 David Miller : > From: Yafang Shao > Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 23:50:44 +0800 > >> 2017-12-08 23:42 GMT+08:00 David Miller : >>> From: Yafang Shao >>> Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:40:23 +0800 >>> >>>> It will looks like t

[PATCH net-next 1/3] net:tracepoint: replace tcp_set_state tracepoint with sock_set_state tracepoint

2017-12-10 Thread Yafang Shao
state); - void sk_set_state(struct sock *sk, int state); As trace header should not be included in other header files, so they are defined in sock.c. The protocol such as SCTP maybe compiled as a ko, hence export sk_set_state(). Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- include/net/sock.h | 15

[PATCH net-next 0/3] replace tcp_set_state tracepoint with sock_set_state tracepoint

2017-12-10 Thread Yafang Shao
Hi, According to the discussion in the mail thread https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10099243/, tcp_set_state tracepoint is renamed to sock_set_state tracepoint and is moved to include/trace/events/sock.h. Using this new tracepoint to trace TCP/DCCP/SCTP state transition. Yafang Shao (3

[PATCH net-next 2/3] net:tracepoint: using sock_set_state tracepoint to trace DCCP state transition

2017-12-10 Thread Yafang Shao
With changes in inet_ files, DCCP state transitions are traced with sock_set_state tracepoint. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- net/dccp/proto.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/dccp/proto.c b/net/dccp/proto.c index b68168f..92b9613 100644 --- a/net/dccp

[PATCH net-next 3/3] net:tracepoint: using sock_set_state tracepoint to trace SCTP state transition

2017-12-10 Thread Yafang Shao
With changes in inet_ files, SCTP state transitions are traced with sockt_set_state tracepoint. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- net/sctp/endpointola.c | 2 +- net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 4 ++-- net/sctp/socket.c| 14 +++--- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions

Re: [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info

2024-10-05 Thread Yafang Shao
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 11:40 PM tyrone-wu wrote: > > Previously when retrieving `bpf_link_info.perf_event` for > kprobe/uprobe/tracepoint, the `name_len` field was not populated by the > kernel, leaving it to reflect the value initially set by the user. This > behavior was inconsistent with how ot

Re: [PATCH bpf v5 1/2] bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info

2024-10-06 Thread Yafang Shao
.com/ > Fixes: 1b715e1b0ec5 ("bpf: Support ->fill_link_info for perf_event") > Signed-off-by: tyrone-wu > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa LGTM Acked-by: Yafang Shao > --- > V4 -> V5: > Link: > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/caloahbc5xm7cbfhau3z5x2pquhihecnwaptjcwiovqtkmdz...@

Re: [PATCH bpf v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: fix perf_event link info name_len assertion

2024-10-06 Thread Yafang Shao
...@mail.gmail.com/ > Fixes: 23cf7aa539dc ("selftests/bpf: Add selftest for fill_link_info") > Signed-off-by: tyrone-wu > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa Acked-by: Yafang Shao > --- > V4 -> V5: no change > > V3 -> V4: > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Zv_PP6

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Add support for hybrid mode

2025-02-03 Thread Yafang Shao
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 9:18 PM Miroslav Benes wrote: > > > > > > > + What exactly is meant by frequent replacements (busy loop?, once a > > > minute?) > > > > The script: > > > > #!/bin/bash > > while true; do > > yum install -y ./kernel-livepatch-6.1.12-0.x86_64.rpm > > ./appl

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] livepatch: Implement livepatch hybrid mode

2025-02-04 Thread Yafang Shao
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 9:21 PM Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Mon 2025-01-27 23:34:50, Yafang Shao wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 10:31 PM Petr Mladek wrote: > > > > > > On Mon 2025-01-27 14:35:26, Yafang Shao wrote: > > > > The atomic replace li

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Add support for hybrid mode

2025-02-04 Thread Yafang Shao
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 9:05 PM Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Mon 2025-02-03 17:44:52, Yafang Shao wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 9:18 PM Miroslav Benes wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > + What exactly is meant by frequent replacements (busy lo

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] livepatch: Implement livepatch hybrid mode

2025-02-07 Thread Yafang Shao
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 5:36 PM Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Fri 2025-02-07 11:16:45, Yafang Shao wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 10:31 AM Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 02:35:26PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: > > > > - Temporary Loss of Patc

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] livepatch: Implement livepatch hybrid mode

2025-02-07 Thread Yafang Shao
On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 12:59 AM Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 11:16:45AM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 10:31 AM Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > Why does this happen? > > > > It occurs during the KLP transition. It seems like

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Add support for hybrid mode

2025-02-07 Thread Yafang Shao
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 7:01 PM Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Wed 2025-02-05 14:16:42, Yafang Shao wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 9:05 PM Petr Mladek wrote: > > > > > > On Mon 2025-02-03 17:44:52, Yafang Shao wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] livepatch: Implement livepatch hybrid mode

2025-02-07 Thread Yafang Shao
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 9:58 PM Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Thu 2025-02-06 10:35:11, Yafang Shao wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 12:03 AM Petr Mladek wrote: > > > > > > On Wed 2025-02-05 10:54:47, Yafang Shao wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 9:21 PM

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Add support for hybrid mode

2025-02-07 Thread Yafang Shao
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 2:01 AM Song Liu wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 6:55 PM Yafang Shao wrote: > [...] > > > I think we should first understand why the trampoline is not > > > freed. > > > > IIUC, the fexit works as follows, > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Add support for hybrid mode

2025-02-09 Thread Yafang Shao
On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 10:49 AM Yafang Shao wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 7:01 PM Petr Mladek wrote: > > > > On Wed 2025-02-05 14:16:42, Yafang Shao wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 9:05 PM Petr Mladek wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon 2025-

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Add support for hybrid mode

2025-02-09 Thread Yafang Shao
On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 11:57 AM Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 11:32 AM Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 07:47:12AM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 10:42 PM Yafang Shao wrote: > > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Add support for hybrid mode

2025-02-05 Thread Yafang Shao
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 5:53 AM Song Liu wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 1:45 AM Yafang Shao wrote: > [...] > > > > If you’re managing a large fleet of servers, this issue is far from > > negligible. > > > > > > > > > Can you provid

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Add support for hybrid mode

2025-02-05 Thread Yafang Shao
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:59 AM Song Liu wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 6:43 AM Yafang Shao wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 5:53 AM Song Liu wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 1:45 AM Yafang Shao wrote: > > > [...] > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] livepatch: Implement livepatch hybrid mode

2025-02-05 Thread Yafang Shao
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 12:03 AM Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Wed 2025-02-05 10:54:47, Yafang Shao wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 9:21 PM Petr Mladek wrote: > > > > > > On Mon 2025-01-27 23:34:50, Yafang Shao wrote: > > > > On Mon, J

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] livepatch: Implement livepatch hybrid mode

2025-02-06 Thread Yafang Shao
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 10:31 AM Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 02:35:26PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: > > The atomic replace livepatch mechanism was introduced to handle scenarios > > where we want to unload a specific livepatch without unloading others. > &

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Add support for hybrid mode

2025-01-27 Thread Yafang Shao
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 9:46 PM Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Mon 2025-01-27 14:35:24, Yafang Shao wrote: > > The atomic replace livepatch mechanism was introduced to handle scenarios > > where we want to unload a specific livepatch without unloading others. > > However, it

[RFC PATCH 0/2] livepatch: Add support for hybrid mode

2025-01-26 Thread Yafang Shao
pport it in kpatch[1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/CALOAHbA9WHPjeZKUcUkwULagQjTMfqAdAg+akqPzbZ7Byc=q...@mail.gmail.com/ [0] Link: https://github.com/dynup/kpatch [1] Yafang Shao (2): livepatch: Add replaceable attribute livepatch: Implement livepatch hybrid mode include/li

[RFC PATCH 1/2] livepatch: Add replaceable attribute

2025-01-26 Thread Yafang Shao
Add a new attribute "replaceable" to allow the coexsist of both atomic replace livepatch and non atomic replace livepatch. If the replaceable is set to 0, the livepatch won't be replaced by a atomic replace livepatch. This is a preparation for the followup patch. Signed-off-

[RFC PATCH 2/2] livepatch: Implement livepatch hybrid mode

2025-01-26 Thread Yafang Shao
lore.kernel.org/live-patching/CALOAHbA9WHPjeZKUcUkwULagQjTMfqAdAg+akqPzbZ7Byc=q...@mail.gmail.com/ [0] Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- kernel/livepatch/core.c | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c index 5e0c2caa0af8..f820b50c1b26

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] livepatch: Implement livepatch hybrid mode

2025-01-27 Thread Yafang Shao
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 10:31 PM Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Mon 2025-01-27 14:35:26, Yafang Shao wrote: > > The atomic replace livepatch mechanism was introduced to handle scenarios > > where we want to unload a specific livepatch without unloading others. > > However, it

[PATCH v2 2/2] livepatch: Replace tasklist_lock with RCU

2025-02-22 Thread Yafang Shao
@jpoimboe/ [1] Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- include/linux/livepatch.h | 4 ++-- kernel/fork.c | 2 +- kernel/livepatch/patch.c | 7 ++- kernel/livepatch/transition.c | 35 ++- kernel/livepatch/transition.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 24

[PATCH v2 0/2] livepatch: some improvements

2025-02-22 Thread Yafang Shao
the root cause is identified, I will submit the fix separately. v1: https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/20250211062437.46811-1-laoar.s...@gmail.com/ Yafang Shao (2): livepatch: Add comment to clarify klp_add_nops() livepatch: Replace tasklist_lock with RCU include/linux/livepatch.h |

[PATCH v2 1/2] livepatch: Add comment to clarify klp_add_nops()

2025-02-22 Thread Yafang Shao
Add detailed comments to clarify the purpose of klp_add_nops() function. These comments are based on Petr's explanation[0]. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/z6xua7d0eu_yd...@pathway.suse.cz/ [0] Suggested-by: Petr Mladek Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao --- k

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] livepatch: Replace tasklist_lock with RCU

2025-02-25 Thread Yafang Shao
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 2:33 AM Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 02:20:46PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: > > +++ b/kernel/livepatch/patch.c > > @@ -95,7 +95,12 @@ static void notrace klp_ftrace_handler(unsigned long ip, > > > > patc

[tip:x86/cleanups] x86/process: Avoid unnecessary NULL check in get_wchan()

2018-11-22 Thread tip-bot for Yafang Shao
Commit-ID: 6e662ae7bce6db602f79e57791f5fb887fb7d371 Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/6e662ae7bce6db602f79e57791f5fb887fb7d371 Author: Yafang Shao AuthorDate: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 19:12:14 +0800 Committer: Ingo Molnar CommitDate: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 07:58:23 +0100 x86/process: Avoid

[tip:x86/cleanups] x86/process: Avoid unnecessary NULL check in get_wchan()

2018-11-22 Thread tip-bot for Yafang Shao
Commit-ID: c382986fe178d02abdfcd6f4e7b9783c2922872c Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/c382986fe178d02abdfcd6f4e7b9783c2922872c Author: Yafang Shao AuthorDate: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 19:12:14 +0800 Committer: Ingo Molnar CommitDate: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:07:21 +0100 x86/process: Avoid

<    1   2   3   4