On 18:59(+0200) Thu 26 Jul, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:36:18PM +0100, Xudong Guan wrote:
> > On my real machine with grub 0.97, there is no problem loading the
> > same kernel.
>
> Do you mean the kernel with the 4fd06960f120e02e9abc802a09f9511c400042
On 18:30(+0200) Thu 26 Jul, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> grub version:
> Version: 0.97-29
On my real machine with grub 0.97, there is no problem loading the
same kernel.
Xudong
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On 13:26(+0200) Tue 24 Jul, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>2.6.23-rc1 won't boot on my Asus M6N laptop and the last thing it shows
> after loading
> grub is "No setup signature found...," which, imho, comes from
> arch/i386/boot/header.S. I tried printing out the value of setup_sig like so
I hitted
On 08:19(-0700) Thu 26 Jul, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> What distro/version of grub are you running? I'm wondering if there are
> some old version of grub out there which did the "load four sectors"
> way-anciently-obsolete crap; the other possibility that comes to mind is
> setting up the stack in an
Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:31:54PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > If we can't reproduce the problem in simulation, that itself will tell
> > us something very important. If we *can* reproduce it in simulation, it
> > will be vastly easier to debug.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5 matches
Mail list logo
