"David St.Clair" wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get my hard drive to use UDMA/66. I'm thinking the cable
> is not being detected. When the HPT366 bios is set to UDMA 4; using
I think that should be UDMA 5 for 66? As far as I can remember UDMA4 is 33MHz with
S.M.A.R.T. which
add some reporting funct
gs,
> Arjan van de Ven
regards,
Wilfried
PS: An uppercase THANX goes to Nail Brown!
--
Wilfried Weissmann ( mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Mobile: +43 676 965
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECT
way to map the sectors according to
the IDE-RAID
spec of the controller over several raid levels.
An ataraid personality would be easier and more flexible then.
regards,
Wilfried
>
> Cheers,
>
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Wilfried Weissmann wrote:
>
> > Arjan van de Ven wro
Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Wilfried Weissmann wrote:
>
> > Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > >
> > > Wilfried,
> > >
> > > Why a module?
> >
> > The idea behind that was that, if it is a seperate module, then it would b
Jakob Østergaard wrote:
> > So... am I just begging for pain if I try to install, say, a stock RH7
> > on a machine with the FastTrak100 doing it's little RAID0/JBOD thing?
> > If it requires this machine to always boot from a floppy because the driver
> > cannot be linked into the kernel, well, I
Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
> > I know, that "input high == UltraATA core, input low = RAID core"
> > according to Andre Hedrick but I really don't care about the RAID
> > core. I want to use this controller to drive JBOD.
>
> Wrong, if Promise
Alan Cox wrote:
> > hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
> > hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
>
> CRC errors are cable errors so that bit is reasonable in itself
Could this be caused by the RAID configuration? The first sector of the
first disk holds
Robert Vojta wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have this card in intranet server and I'm very confused about very often
> message in log like this:
>
> eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 82.
> Flags; bus-master 1, dirty 20979238(6) current 20979242(10)
> Transmit list 1f659290 vs. df659260.
> 0:
Hi,
The kernels 2.4.28+ and 2.6.9+ with IPv4 and ATM-CLIP enabled have bugs in
the neighbour cache code. neigh_delete() and neigh_add() only work properly
if one cache table per address family exist. After ATM-CLIP installed a
second cache table for AF_INET, neigh_delete() and neigh_add() only exa
"Kevin P. Fleming" wrote:
>
> I upgraded two machines here from 2.4.7-pre6 to 2.4.7-pre7 yesterday
> afternoon.
>
> The first machine I upgraded, my workstation, is a 1GHz Athlon on a VIA
> KT133 (not A) motherboard using a NetGear FA312TX network card. This machine
> has always run Linux just f
Hello Andre,
Sorry for responding a little late. I spent some time in the big blue
room (not that is was that blue lately!).
Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Wilfried Weissmann wrote:
>
> > > off to the head or tail of the drive and get me that r
out. The future of my mod
is unknown because of the IDE guys want to support the ata raids. So it
might become obsolete.
good luck,
Wilfried
--
Wilfried Weissmann ( mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Mobile: +43 676 965
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kern
Hi!
I just put my highpoint-tech raid hack on a website:
http://www.rug-rats.org/~wilfried/
So if you want to play around with it you can download it from there +
get a mininum of documentation.
Andre Hedric, Ajran van de Ven, ...:
I am sorry that I did not had much time lately to get some infor
13 matches
Mail list logo
