[PATCH v3] selftests/x86: Support Atom for syscall_arg_fault test

ge faults are within the 10th(lowest priority) class, and as it said, "exceptions within each class are implementation-dependent and may vary from processor to processor". It's expected for processors like Intel Atom to trigger stack fault(SIGBUS), while we get page fault(SIGSEGV) f

RE: [PATCH] selftests/x86: Support Atom for syscall_arg_fault test

we get page fault(sigsegv) from common Core processors. Thanks, Bo -Original Message- From: Andy Lutomirski [mailto:l...@kernel.org] Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 2:10 AM To: Tong, Bo Cc: Shuah Khan ; Andrew Lutomirski ; open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK ; LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftest

[PATCH v2] selftests/x86: Support Atom for syscall_arg_fault test

ge faults are within the 10th(lowest priority) class, and as it said, "exceptions within each class are implementation-dependent and may vary from processor to processor". It's expected for processors like Intel Atom to trigger stack fault(SIGBUS), while we get page fault(SIGSEGV) from

[PATCH] selftests/x86: Support Atom for syscall_arg_fault test

ge faults are within the 10th(lowest priority) class, and as it said, "exceptions within each class are implementation-dependent and may vary from processor to processor". It's expected for processors like Intel Atom to trigger stack fault(sigbus), while we get page fault(sig

RE: [PATCH v3] selftests/x86: Support Atom for syscall_arg_fault test

Is this patch going to be merged? Or still any blocking issue there? Thanks, Bo -Original Message- From: shuah [mailto:sh...@kernel.org] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 10:05 PM To: Tong, Bo ; l...@kernel.org; x...@kernel.org Cc: linux-kselft...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel