Re: drm i915 hangs on heavy io load

2012-10-29 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 21:32:53 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Chris, > > > > so can you > > please file a bug on bugzilla.freedesktop.org (or bugzilla.kernel.org) > > so that we don't lose track of it. > > Will do when I'm back from the mountains. > > > If your have the option, can you s

No 3.5 version on www.kernel.org

2012-08-05 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi, when looking at http://www.kernel.org/, kernel 3.4.7 is shown as the latest stable kernel, and 3.6-rc1 as the latest mainline kernel. The 3.5 version is not mentioned. Why is the latest stable kernel something older than 3.5? Regards, Tino -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu

2.6.25-rc2 hangs after "Suspending console(s)"

2008-02-17 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi folks, with 2.6.25-rc2, my Mac mini Core Duo hangs at suspend. The last message on the console is "Suspending console(s)". I also tried some other versions after 2.6.24, all of them fail with this hang. I attached the lspci output for the case that it matters. Regards, Tino 00:00.0 Host bridg

Re: 2.6.25-rc2 hangs after "Suspending console(s)"

2008-02-19 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 20:49:04 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2008-02-18 01:28:15, Tino Keitel wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > with 2.6.25-rc2, my Mac mini Core Duo hangs at suspend. The last > > message on the console is "Suspending console(s)". I als

Re: 2.6.25-rc2 regression - hang on suspend

2008-02-19 Thread Tino Keitel
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:59:46 +0100, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > Hi, > > since 2.6.25-rc1 (first version I tried) and still in rc2 (and git), I > see a hang on s2ram already when trying to suspend. > > This is on a macbookpro 1,1 - which steps should I do next to help > isolating the problem?

Re: 2.6.25-rc2 hangs after "Suspending console(s)"

2008-02-19 Thread Tino Keitel
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:52:22 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 20:49:04 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Mon 2008-02-18 01:28:15, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > with 2.6.25-rc2, my Mac mini Core Duo hangs at suspend. The

ath5k failure with 2.6.24-git14

2008-02-05 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi, I tried the current git (9ef9dc69d4167276c04590d67ee55de8380bc1ad) and got the following error message from ath5k: ath5k_pci :02:00.0: registered as 'phy0' ath5k phy0: failed to resume the MAC Chip ath5k_pci: probe of :02:00.0 failed with error -5 Here is the lspci -vnn output: 02:0

Re: [RFT 1/1] single_chip test

2008-02-07 Thread Tino Keitel
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:46:39 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote: > > > We failed to resume after a hardware reset here for a whole second. Is > > > there any > > > version of ath5k which worked for you (is this a regression)? > > > > I cannot speak for Tino, but my ath5k never worked in MacBook -- it >

Re: [RFT 1/1] single_chip test

2008-02-07 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 22:51:04 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: [...] > What's the srev a phy ver printed few lines above this, please? ath5k_pci :02:00.0: registered as 'phy0' SINGLE: 1, srev: a3, phy: phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'pid' ath5k phy0: Atheros AR5424 chip found (MAC: 0xa3, P

Re: 2.6.25-rc2 hangs after "Suspending console(s)"

2008-02-24 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 22:43:50 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, 20 of February 2008, Tino Keitel wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:52:22 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 20:49:04 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > On Mon 20

Re: Linux 2.6.24.3

2008-02-25 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 17:00:24 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.24.3 > kernel. Hi, I can see the patch in http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/, but no incremental patch in http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/incr/. Is

crashes if accassing FAT MO

2001-03-08 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi folks, I use kernel 2.4.2. If I try to access files on a 640 MB MO (2048 bytes hardware sector size) and the MO is using FAT fs I only got messages like these: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address printing eip: *pde = Oops: CPU:

Re: crashes if accassing FAT MO

2001-03-09 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thursday, 8. March 2001 17:42, Tino Keitel wrote: > Hi folks, > > I use kernel 2.4.2. If I try to access files on a 640 MB MO (2048 bytes > hardware sector size) and the MO is using FAT fs I only got messages > like these: > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer d

Re: sr device can be written?

2005-08-30 Thread Tino Keitel
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:53:51 +0800, jeff shia wrote: > Hello, > Sr is the Scsi-cdrom device?so it can be read only?but look at the source= > =20 > code I notice that > sr can be written also!Is it right? Just imagine a DVD-RAM drive. Regards, Tino - To unsubscribe from this list: send the li

Re: sr device can be written?

2005-08-30 Thread Tino Keitel
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 16:11:58 +0800, jeff shia wrote: > YOu mean the device file can be written? Yes, like an ordinary block device. > > > On 8/30/05, Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:53:51 +0800, jeff shia wrote: > > > H

Could not set non-blocking flag with 2.6.24-rc5

2007-12-13 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi folks, I often build Debian packages inside a chroot. Today I discovered a failure during an "aptitude update", which is a command to download new package lists for the package management. In strace, the lines around the failure look like this: 99% [Working]) = 14 14 [pid 5986] select

Re: RTC wakealarm write-only, still has 644 permissions

2007-11-29 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 00:26:47 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: [...] > > > Also, is there some documentation for wakealarm? > > > > "git show 3925a5ce44330767f7f0de5c58c6a797009f0f75" has some. > > Thanks. Will put it into Doc*/rtc.txt. It would be nice if you mention the differences to the old /

Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related)

2007-11-29 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 22:05:24 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [...] > Tino, can you check if this patch helps, please? Not really. I suspend one to several times a day, and in most cases resume works. I thing checking the patch is hard when I have no real procedure to reproduce the resume fai

Re: XFS related Oops

2007-11-26 Thread Tino Keitel
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > No. I'd say something go

Re: XFS related Oops

2007-11-26 Thread Tino Keitel
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > No. I'd say something go

Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related)

2007-11-27 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 23:07:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [...] > On 2.6.23.1 you can test the freezer alone by doing > > # echo testproc > /sys/power/disk > # echo disk > /sys/power/state This is suspend to RAM, not to disk. Regards, Tino - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: Could not set non-blocking flag with 2.6.24-rc5

2008-01-13 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 21:10:15 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:16:01PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I often build Debian packages inside a chroot. Today I discovered a > > failure during an "aptitude update"

Re: Could not set non-blocking flag with 2.6.24-rc5

2008-01-13 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 09:56:55 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 21:10:15 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:16:01PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > I often build Debian packages i

2.6.24 regression: Wake On Lan in sky2 broken on Mac mini

2008-01-27 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi folks, with 2.6.24-rc8, Wake On LAN doesn't work anymore as it used to with 2.6.23 on my Mac mini Core Duo. I saw that this was reported in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9721 and on netdev a patch for the sky2 driver was sent by Stephen Hemminger. This patch fixed WOL for me after

Re: Troubles waking up from suspend (S3) - how to debug?

2008-01-27 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 18:42:37 +0100, Bruno Prémont wrote: > I'm currently trying out suspend (S3) on a few machines but none of them > wakes > up completely/properly (I have a few more hosts I'm planning to try suspend > on once I can get useful information out of those not waking up properly

Re: 2.6.24 regression: Wake On Lan in sky2 broken on Mac mini

2008-01-28 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:21:30 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Tino Keitel writes: > > Hi folks, > > > > with 2.6.24-rc8, Wake On LAN doesn't work anymore as it used to with > > 2.6.23 on my Mac mini Core Duo. I saw that this was reported in > > http

Re: 2.6.24 regression: Wake On Lan in sky2 broken on Mac mini

2008-01-28 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 14:37:38 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote: [...] > However, it _is_ a fact that there is a proliferation of specialized > mailing lists, and it is also a fact that many developers _only_ read > those lists. I'm in no way defending this behaviour, on the contrary > I probably

Re: [Problem] slow write to dvd-ram since 2.6.7-bk8

2005-02-14 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:26:35 -0500, Wakko Warner wrote: > Droebbel wrote: > > On recent kernels, writing to DVD-RAM is much slower than to be > > expected. A 3x Writer should do about 1.9MB/s including automatic > > verify. This is what I get with 2.6.7 up to bk7. However, from 2.6.7-bk8 > > to

Re: [Problem] slow write to dvd-ram since 2.6.7-bk8

2005-02-17 Thread Tino Keitel
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 23:29:24 +0100, Droebbel wrote: > On Mi, 2005-02-16 at 22:55 +0100, Droebbel wrote: > >Some new information: > > > >2.6.7 is ok, 2.6.7-mm2 is not ok, 2.6.7 with just the linus-patch from > >mm2 is ok, 2.6.7 with linus.patch from mm3 isn't. > >So I took some of the patches fr

Strage buffer behaviour

2007-11-11 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi folks, I noticed that the kernel (2.6.23.1) seems to buffer only certain partitions on my system: $ for i in 1 2 3 4 ; do for j in 1 2 ; do dd if=/dev/sda$i of=/dev/null bs=1024k count=100 ; done ; done 100+0 records in 100+0 records out 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 3.01471 seconds, 34.8 M

XFS related Oops

2007-11-11 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi, after resume from suspend with 2.6.23.1, I got the following Oops: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 3e0d204c printing eip: c022807f *pde = Oops: [#1] SMP Modules linked in: dvb_usb_cinergyT2 i915 drm cpufreq_stats usblp firewire_ohci firewire_core

Re: XFS related Oops

2007-11-13 Thread Tino Keitel
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote: [...] > No. I'd say something got screwed up during suspend/resume. Is it > reproducable? No. I often use suspend to RAM, and usually it works without such failures. I restart squid during the resume prosecure, and the above Oops lead

2.6.23-rc1: USB hard disk broken

2007-07-25 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi, I just tried 2.6.23-rc1 and shortly after the boot my external USB hard disk went mad. I all started with these kernel messages: kern.info: usb 1-6: USB disconnect, address 5 kern.info: sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=0x07 driverbyte=0x00 kern.warn: end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector

Re: 2.6.23-rc1: USB hard disk broken

2007-07-25 Thread Tino Keitel
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:24:36 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Mittwoch 25 Juli 2007 schrieb Tino Keitel: > > Hi, > > > > I just tried 2.6.23-rc1 and shortly after the boot my external USB hard > > disk went mad. [...] > Please recompile with CONFIG_USB

Re: 2.6.23-rc1: USB hard disk broken

2007-08-05 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:06:40 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Mittwoch 25 Juli 2007 schrieb Tino Keitel: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:24:36 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch 25 Juli 2007 schrieb Tino Keitel: > > > > Hi, > > > > > &g

Re: 2.6.23-rc1: USB hard disk broken

2007-08-05 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 13:09:42 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:06:40 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Am Mittwoch 25 Juli 2007 schrieb Tino Keitel: > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:24:36 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > > Am Mittwoch 25

Re: Page Cache Question

2007-08-05 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 09:32:59 -0700, Adnan Khaleel wrote: > > I'm looking for a way to disable the page cache for an > experimental NUMA system running the 2.6.17 kernel. I would prefer to > only disable the page cache for my process and still have it be enabled > by the rest of the system. Is

Re: 2.6.23-rc1: USB hard disk broken

2007-08-09 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 16:00:13 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: [...] > What makes you think the problem you see is the same as the one > described by Tino? Do you get the "scatterlist error 0/-121" line in > your log? > > Please provide a dmesg log showing your problem with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG > ena

Re: 2.6.23 - MacMini - snd-hda-intel stopped working

2007-10-22 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 23:08:32 -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote: > Ubuntu kernel 2.6.22-10 works fine - I get sound although volume > control doesn't seem to work. > > With 2.6.23 (today's git actually) I get this error on loading snd-hda-intel - > > [ 672.830052] PCI: Setting latency timer of devi

Re: How to interpret PM_TRACE output

2006-12-21 Thread Tino Keitel
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 16:19:04 +, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > I tried PM_TRACE to find the driver that breaks resume from suspend. > > > > I got working resume until I switched to the sk98lin driver > > > > (because sky2 doesn't support wake on LAN). That's why I was quite sure > >

Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?

2007-02-12 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 07:46:36 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: [...] > Many people also have Linux on their notebooks, but as a dual-boot. You > read the word ? "dual-boot". It means that they cleanly shutdown their > system every time they don't use it anymore, and they won't know what > OS they'l

How to interpret PM_TRACE output

2006-12-13 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi folks, I tried PM_TRACE to find the driver that breaks resume from suspend. I got working resume until I switched to the sk98lin driver (because sky2 doesn't support wake on LAN). That's why I was quite sure that sk98lin is the culprit, but I tried PM_TRACE anymay. Here is the PM_TRACE output

Re: How to interpret PM_TRACE output

2006-12-19 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 08:57:48 +, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 13-12-06 22:22:59, Tino Keitel wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I tried PM_TRACE to find the driver that breaks resume from suspend. > > I got working resume until I switched to the sk98lin driver > &

2.6.20-rc3 regression: suspend to RAM broken on Mac mini Core Duo

2007-01-07 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi folks, I tried 2.6.20-rc3 and suspend to RAM is now broken. The screen stays dark after resume, the same with the network link. It worked with 2.6.18 (I skipped 2.6.19 because of a regression in the sky2 driver). I enabled pm_trace and did a echo mem > /sys/power/state in single user mode. Af

Re: 2.6.20-rc3 regression: suspend to RAM broken on Mac mini Core Duo

2007-01-07 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 13:23:13 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 16:17 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > No information about the device/driver that refuses to resume. > > You should be able to identify the problematic driver by removing each > driver manually bef

Re: 2.6.20-rc3 regression: suspend to RAM broken on Mac mini Core Duo

2007-01-07 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 21:04:53 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 13:23:13 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 16:17 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > No information about the device/driver that refuses to resume. > > > > You

Re: 2.6.20-rc3 regression: suspend to RAM broken on Mac mini Core Duo

2007-01-08 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 00:44:45 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 11:27:06PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 21:04:53 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 13:23:13 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2

Re: 2.6.20-rc3 regression: suspend to RAM broken on Mac mini Core Duo

2007-01-08 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 17:17:19 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Sun 2007-01-07 23:27:06, Tino Keitel wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 21:04:53 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 13:23:13 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2007-01-07 at

Re: 2.6.20-rc3 regression: suspend to RAM broken on Mac mini Core Duo

2007-01-09 Thread Tino Keitel
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 22:51:04 +0800, Luming Yu wrote: > >> > It didn't. It looks like it is unusable, becuase it isn't reliable in > >> > 2.6.20-rc3. > >> > >> Is this issue still present in -rc4? > > > >I used 2.6.20-rc4 in single user mode, and applied 2 patches from > >netdev to get wake on L

Re: 2.6.20-rc3 regression: suspend to RAM broken on Mac mini Core Duo

2007-01-12 Thread Tino Keitel
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 14:50:25 +, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > >> > It didn't. It looks like it is unusable, becuase it isn't reliable in > > > >> > 2.6.20-rc3. > > > >> > > > >> Is this issue still present in -rc4? > > > > > > > >I used 2.6.20-rc4 in single user mode, and applied 2 pat

Re: 2.6.20-rc3 regression: suspend to RAM broken on Mac mini Core Duo

2007-01-12 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 04:05:28 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: [...] > I think I found the problem. In 2.6.18, I had a slightly different > config. With 2.6.20-rc4, I had sucessful suspend/resume cycles without > the USB DVB-T box attached. I tweaked the USB options a bit and > ac

Re: 2.6.20-rc3 regression: suspend to RAM broken on Mac mini Core Duo

2007-01-13 Thread Tino Keitel
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 04:45:12 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 04:05:28 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > [...] > > > I think I found the problem. In 2.6.18, I had a slightly different > > config. With 2.6.20-rc4, I had sucessful suspend/resume cycles w

Re: [rtc-linux] Re: rtc_cmos: error after first write to wakealarm

2007-06-19 Thread Tino Keitel
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 14:24:04 +0200, Alessandro Zummo wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:03:19 +0200 > Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I have the following strange behaviour with rtc_cmos: > > > > > > > > $ echo 1181934240

Re: [rtc-linux] Re: rtc_cmos: error after first write to wakealarm

2007-06-22 Thread Tino Keitel
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:45:52 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 22 June 2007, Alessandro Zummo wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:24:29 +0200 > > Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Where is the documentation that describes that

Re: Bad behaviour after hdparm -M 128

2007-06-11 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 22:50:04 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: [...] > I just tracked it down to hdparm. Version 6.9 (the one in Debian stable) > doesn't work right with libata. Version 7.5 (the one in Debian unstable) > works fine. > > So, at least in my side, there are *no* kerne

Re: RTC_DRV_CMOS can break userspace interface

2007-06-12 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 13:14:58 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:35:18AM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > > (By the way, it helps if you Cc: me - it's easy to lose track of > things > in the LKML noise) > > > Here it is: > > > > st

rtc_cmos: error after first write to wakealarm

2007-06-14 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi, I have the following strange behaviour with rtc_cmos: $ echo 1181934240 > /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm bash: echo: write error: Device or resource busy $ rmmod rtc_cmos $ modprobe rtc_cmos $ echo 1181934240 > /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm $ echo 1181934240 > /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm bas

Re: rtc_cmos: error after first write to wakealarm

2007-06-15 Thread Tino Keitel
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 15:59:04 +0900, Yoichi Yuasa wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:33:08 +0200 > Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have the following strange behaviour with rtc_cmos: > > > > $ echo 1181934240 > /sys/clas

Re: RTC_DRV_CMOS can break userspace interface

2007-05-30 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 14:06:52 -0700, David Brownell wrote: [...] > That seems to be true. And those particular users should learn the > portable /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm syntax ... e.g. using numeric > seconds-since-epoch ("date '+%s'") instead of strings the kernel needs > to parse. Th

Re: RTC_DRV_CMOS can break userspace interface

2007-06-01 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:26:04 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:32:29AM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > rtc_cmos 00:09: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0 > > rtc_cmos: probe of 00:09 failed with error -16 > > drivers/rtc/hctosys.c: unable

Re: RTC_DRV_CMOS can break userspace interface

2007-06-04 Thread Tino Keitel
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 13:54:23 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:46:06AM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > > Yes, you are right. I think this issue should be covered by Kconfig. > > > > However: > > > > $ cat wakealarm > > cat: wa

Bad behaviour after hdparm -M 128

2007-06-05 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi, I tried to enable acoustic management on my SATA drive, because hdparm -I reported a recommended value of 128, and a current value of 0 (off). I did this: $ sudo hdparm -M 128 /dev/sda /dev/sda: setting acoustic management to 128 HDIO_DRIVE_CMD:ACOUSTIC failed: Input/output error acoustic

possible USB regression with 2.6.21-rc4: iPod doesn't work

2007-03-21 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi folks, I plugged my iPod nano 8 GB in and got this message with 2.6.21-rc4: hub 1-0:1.0: over-current change on port 1 along with other USB error messages. I tried a hub with own power supply and a USB port on the computer. A full log is attached. When I boot with 2.6.20, it works: usb 1-5.

Re: 2.6.21-rc suspend regression

2007-03-21 Thread Tino Keitel
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 23:54:04 +0100, Frédéric RISS wrote: > My MacMini (Intel Core Duo, EFI mode) doesn't come out of suspend to ram I tested suspend to RAM today with my mini. It also failed to resume. I don't use EFI but boot via GRUB. Regards, Tino - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: [linux-usb-devel] possible USB regression with 2.6.21-rc4: iPod doesn't work

2007-03-22 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:50:29 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 21:47 schrieb Tino Keitel: > > > along with other USB error messages. I tried a hub with own power > > supply and a USB port on the computer. A full log is attached. > > Your log bas

Re: [linux-usb-devel] possible USB regression with 2.6.21-rc4: iPod doesn't work

2007-03-22 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:50:29 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 21:47 schrieb Tino Keitel: > > > along with other USB error messages. I tried a hub with own power > > supply and a USB port on the computer. A full log is attached. > > Your log bas

Re: [linux-usb-devel] possible USB regression with 2.6.21-rc4: iPod doesn't work

2007-03-22 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 15:40:40 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:50:29 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 21:47 schrieb Tino Keitel: > > > > > > > along with ot

Re: [linux-usb-devel] possible USB regression with 2.6.21-rc4: iPod doesn't work

2007-03-22 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 14:29:11 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 22 March 2007 12:54 pm, Tino Keitel wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 15:40:40 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > _Something_ is generating those overcurrent > > > warnings, and it sure looks

Re: [PATCH] clockevents: Fix suspend/resume to disk hangs

2007-03-23 Thread Tino Keitel
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 10:14:11 +0100, Marcus Better wrote: > Marcus Better wrote: > > The XFS workqueue patch [1] fixes my problem [2]. > > > [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/507616 > > [2] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/505570 > > Unfortunately it only fixed sus

Re: [linux-usb-devel] possible USB regression with 2.6.21-rc4: iPod doesn't work

2007-03-25 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 20:42:44 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 22. März 2007 20:17 schrieb Tino Keitel: > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:50:29 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 21:47 schrieb Tino Keitel: > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-04-12 Thread Tino Keitel
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 18:01:12 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Wed 04-04-07 08:36:20, Tino Keitel wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 10:48:27 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > Well, it works for me on 32-bit as well, right up to

Re: [linux-usb-devel] possible USB regression with 2.6.21-rc4: iPod doesn't work

2007-03-26 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 14:12:25 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > > Please recompile > > > with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG > > > and without CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND > > > > With CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND disabled, the iPod works. T

Re: [linux-usb-devel] possible USB regression with 2.6.21-rc4: iPod doesn't work

2007-03-26 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 16:28:34 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > Attached is a dmesg output with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG and CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND > > enabled. > > > > There are no messages from the iPod because, well, nothing happens

Re: [linux-usb-devel] possible USB regression with 2.6.21-rc4: iPod doesn't work

2007-03-26 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 17:15:53 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: [...] > The lack of messages from the iPod seems to indicate that the hub isn't > working right. You could try plugging the iPod into a different hub or > directly into the computer. Or maybe into a different port of that hub. I already

Re: [linux-usb-devel] possible USB regression with 2.6.21-rc4: iPod doesn't work

2007-03-26 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 17:15:53 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: [...] > The lack of messages from the iPod seems to indicate that the hub isn't > working right. You could try plugging the iPod into a different hub or > directly into the computer. Or maybe into a different port of that hub. Uh, I thi

Re: [linux-usb-devel] possible USB regression with 2.6.21-rc4: iPod doesn't work

2007-03-26 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 23:26:14 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 17:15:53 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > [...] > > > The lack of messages from the iPod seems to indicate that the hub isn't > > working right. You could try plugging the iPod into a

Re: [linux-usb-devel] possible USB regression with 2.6.21-rc4: iPod doesn't work

2007-03-26 Thread Tino Keitel
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 00:21:24 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: [...] > this is the bisect result: > > $ git bisect good > 1d619f128ba911cd3e6d6ad3475f146eb92f5c27 is first bad commit > commit 1d619f128ba911cd3e6d6ad3475f146eb92f5c27 I just tested 2.6.21-rc5 with this commit revert

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-03-29 Thread Tino Keitel
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 17:44:47 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > Hello, > > the patches attached to six following emails implement some cleanup and > fixes in the UDF code. The main two fixes are: > 1) UDF now works correctly for files larger than 1GB. Hi, I tried 2.6.20 with your patches and got

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-03-31 Thread Tino Keitel
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 14:06:34 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > Tino Keitel wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 17:44:47 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> the patches attached to six following emails implement some cleanup and > >>

Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes

2007-04-03 Thread Tino Keitel
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 10:48:27 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: [...] > Well, it works for me on 32-bit as well, right up to 100% full. > No problems at all... Maybe it depends on the kernel. I patched 2.6.20 with the patches above and got the described behaviour. Regards, Tino - To unsubscribe fro

Re: [4/4] 2.6.23-rc3: known regressions v3

2007-08-24 Thread Tino Keitel
e an easy job, > but one that is really needed. Keep up the great work. > > > USB > > > > Subject : 2.6.23-rc1: USB hard disk broken > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/25/62 > > Last known good : ? > > Submitter : Tino Keite