Network Performance?

2001-01-03 Thread Tim Sailer
nts have the large tcp window size. Putting the Linux box in the middle is a severe choke point. :( -- Tim Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyber Security Operations Brookhaven National Laboratory (631) 344-3001 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel&quo

Re: Network Performance?

2001-01-05 Thread Tim Sailer
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:33:40AM -0500, Tim Sailer wrote: > This may not be the right forum to ask this. If not, please let me know > where to ask. > > I have a Debian box with 2 NICs. Both 100/full duplex. This machine is > running as a ftp proxy (T.Rex suite). As part of th

Re: Network Performance?

2001-01-07 Thread Tim Sailer
st12pre3". Dunno about kernel 2.2 though. Well, on Friday, we pulled down the 'official' 2.4.0, and had the same experience... nothing better. Should I get the -test12-pre3 kernel and try that one specifically? Tim -- Tim Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyber Security Operations B

Re: Network Performance?

2001-01-08 Thread Tim Sailer
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:26:23PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > Tim Sailer wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 10:11:40PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > this issue was discussed on the netdev mailing list a few weeks > > > back. > > > > >

Re: Network Performance?

2001-01-09 Thread Tim Sailer
at as the first thing. Both are set the same. No collisions out of the ordinary. Tim -- Tim Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyber Security Operations Brookhaven National Laboratory (631) 344-3001 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the bo

Re: Network Performance?

2001-01-09 Thread Tim Sailer
solaris tends to have poorly tuned tcp values out of the box, look at > this link and tune the solaris stack to better reflect reality. > >http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:www.rvs.uni-hannover.de/people/voeckler/tune/EN/tune.html+%2Bwan+%2Bwindow+%2Bscale+%2Bsize+%2Bnetwork&hl=en > &

Re: Network Performance?

2001-01-09 Thread Tim Sailer
/rmem_default = 32767 net/core/wmem_default = 32767 net/core/rmem_max = 2097152 net/core/wmem_max = 2097152 Tim -- Tim Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyber Security Operations Brookhaven National Laboratory (631) 344-3001 - To unsubscribe from thi

Re: Network Performance?

2001-01-09 Thread Tim Sailer
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 05:52:34PM +0100, Martin Josefsson wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Tim Sailer wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:07:18PM +0100, Erik Mouw wrote: > > > I had similar problems two weeks ago. Turned out the connection between > > > two switch

Re: Network Performance?

2001-01-09 Thread Tim Sailer
152 > > > > The defaults must be large unless your application calls setsockopt() to > set the buffers itself. (Some FTP clients and servers can do this, but > for testing, your're still probably better always having the _max&#x