On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 11:19 PM Jaewon Kim wrote:
>
> As the legacy lru provides, the lru_gen needs some trace events for
> debugging.
>
Hi Jaewon, thanks for adding this.
> This commit introduces 2 trace events.
> trace_mm_vmscan_lru_gen_scan
> trace_mm_vmscan_lru_gen_evict
>
> Each event i
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 7:27 PM 김재원 wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 09:12:30 -0700
> >"T.J. Mercier" wrote:
> >
> >> > + TP_fast_assign(
> >> > + __entry->nid = nid;
> >> > + __entry->nr_
n ‘mount’
> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 42 | ret = mount("", "/", NULL, MS_PRIVATE | MS_REC, 0);
> | ^~~~~
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Seiderer
Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 1:53 AM Peter Seiderer wrote:
>
> Hello T.J.,
>
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 23:02:02 +, "T.J. Mercier"
> wrote:
>
> > pid_max.c: In function ‘pid_max_cb’:
> > pid_max.c:42:15: error:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 3:48 PM Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> On 4/7/25 16:59, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> > pid_max.c: In function ‘pid_max_cb’:
> > pid_max.c:42:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mount’
> > [-Wimplicit-function
function)
48 | umount2("/proc", MNT_DETACH);
Fixes: 615ab43b838b ("tests/pid_namespace: add pid_max tests")
Signed-off-by: T.J. Mercier
---
tools/testing/selftests/pid_namespace/pid_max.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+
implicit declaration of function ‘ioctl’
> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 172 | self->child_pidfd_derived_nsfds[i] =
> ioctl(self->pidfd, info->pidfd_ioctl, 0);
> | ^
>
> Signed
implicit declaration of function ‘mount’
> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 230 | r = mount(NULL, "/", NULL, MS_REC | MS_PRIVATE, 0);
> | ^
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Seiderer
Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier
> ---
> tools/test
function)
48 | umount2("/proc", MNT_DETACH);
Fixes: 615ab43b838b ("tests/pid_namespace: add pid_max tests")
Signed-off-by: T.J. Mercier
---
tools/testing/selftests/pid_namespace/pid_max.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 1:06 PM Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 06:02:54PM +, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> > The closing parentheses around the read syscall is misplaced, causing
> > single byte reads from the iterator instead of buf sized reads.
"
145/1 kmem_cache_iter/check_task_struct:OK
145/2 kmem_cache_iter/check_slabinfo:OK
145/3 kmem_cache_iter/open_coded_iter:OK
145 kmem_cache_iter:OK
Summary: 1/3 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Fixes: a496d0cdc84d ("selftests/bpf: Add a test for kmem_cache_iter")
Signed-
On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 10:50 AM Song Liu wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 10:33 AM T.J. Mercier wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 2:12 AM Saket Kumar Bhaskar
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On linux-next, build for bpf selftest displays an error due
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 2:12 AM Saket Kumar Bhaskar wrote:
>
> On linux-next, build for bpf selftest displays an error due to
> mismatch in the expected function signature of bpf_testmod_test_read
> and bpf_testmod_test_write.
>
> Commit 97d06802d10a ("sysfs: constify bin_attribute argument of
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
