On 7/28/2012 7:11 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 13:56 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> An Andre To Remember
>> July 2012
>>
>> Linux lost a friend and advocate this month. Though never a household
>> name, Andre Hedrick had a positive impact on everyone today runni
On 5/15/2013 7:59 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> [cc xfs list, seeing as that's where all the people who use XFS in
> these sorts of configurations hang out. ]
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:04:44AM -0400, David Oostdyk wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a few relatively high-end systems with hardware RAIDs
On 5/16/2013 5:56 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:35:08AM -0400, David Oostdyk wrote:
>> On 05/16/13 07:36, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>> On 5/15/2013 7:59 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>>> [cc xfs list, seeing as that's where all the people
On 8/21/2012 9:51 AM, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> On 08/20/2012 01:34 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> I'm glad you jumped in David. You made a critical statement of fact
>> below which clears some things up. If you had stated it early on,
>> before Miquel stole the t
On 9/19/2012 1:52 PM, Nix wrote:
> So I have this x86-64 server running Linux 3.5.1
When did you install 3.5.1 on this machine? If fairly recently, does it
run without these errors when booted into the previous kernel?
> with a SATA-on-PCIe
> Areca 1210 hardware RAID-5 controller driven by liba
On 8/15/2012 12:57 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:50 AM, John Robinson
> wrote:
>> On 15/08/2012 01:49, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>> If I do:
>>> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md0p1 bs=8M
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> It looks like md isn't recognizing that I'm writing whole stripes whe
On 8/15/2012 5:10 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> On 8/15/2012 12:57 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:50 AM, John Robinson
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 15/08/2012 01:49, Andy Lutomirski wr
On 8/15/2012 6:07 PM, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article you write:
>> It's time to blow away the array and start over. You're already
>> misaligned, and a 512KB chunk is insanely unsuitable for parity RAID,
>> but for a handful of niche all streaming workloads with little/no
>> rewrite,
On 8/16/2012 4:50 PM, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> On 16-08-12 1:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> On 8/15/2012 6:07 PM, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>>> Ehrm no. If you modify, say, a 4K block on a RAID5 array, you just have
>>> to read that 4K block, and the co
On 8/19/2012 9:01 AM, David Brown wrote:
> I'm sort of jumping in to this thread, so my apologies if I repeat
> things other people have said already.
I'm glad you jumped in David. You made a critical statement of fact
below which clears some things up. If you had stated it early on,
before Miqu
Dave is on the other side of the international date line from those of
us in the States. If my time zone math is correct, this thread began
and continued *after* the end of his 'normal' Friday workday, during
Dave's weekend. You think it might be possible he decided to unplug and
actually live fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
