Re: [PATCH 02/25] HID: multitouch: add support for Nexio 42" panel

2013-01-28 Thread Stéphane Chatty
Le 28 janv. 2013 à 16:01, Henrik Rydberg a écrit : > Hi Benjamin, > >> This device is the worst device I saw. It keeps TipSwitch and InRange >> at 1 for fingers that are not touching the panel. >> The solution is to rely on the field ContactCount, which is accurate >> as the correct information

Re: [PATCH v1] i2c-hid: introduce HID over i2c specification implementation

2012-10-06 Thread Stéphane Chatty
Hi Jean (I cc Marcel Holtmann because BT is involved too) Le 6 oct. 2012 à 22:04, Jean Delvare a écrit : > Hi Benjamin, > > On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:41:43 +0200, benjamin.tissoires wrote: >> From: Benjamin Tissoires >> >> Microsoft published the protocol specification of HID over i2c: >> http:/

Re: [PATCH v1] i2c-hid: introduce HID over i2c specification implementation

2012-10-06 Thread Stéphane Chatty
Le 6 oct. 2012 à 23:11, Jean Delvare a écrit : > On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 22:30:00 +0200, Stéphane Chatty wrote: >> Le 6 oct. 2012 à 22:04, Jean Delvare a écrit : >>> Looks like the wrong place for this driver. HID-over-USB support lives >>> under drivers/hid, so your dri

Re: [PATCH v1] i2c-hid: introduce HID over i2c specification implementation

2012-10-06 Thread Stéphane Chatty
Le 6 oct. 2012 à 23:28, Jiri Kosina a écrit : > On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Jiri Kosina wrote: > >>> My vote is a clear 3. It took me a few years to kick all users (as >>> opposed to implementers) of i2c from drivers/i2c and finding them a >>> proper home, I'm not going to accept new intruders. Grouping

Re: [PATCH v1] i2c-hid: introduce HID over i2c specification implementation

2012-10-07 Thread Stéphane Chatty
Le 7 oct. 2012 à 18:07, Benjamin Tissoires a écrit : >>> >>> Basically, to me this all boils down to the question -- what is more >>> important: low-level transport being used, or the general function of the >>> device? >>> >>> To me, it's the latter, and as such, everything would belong under >