Hello folks,
I was looking at why I can't load the Intel RNG driver (or why it doesn't load
automatically) and
it just so happens I have both the mobile and non-mobile ICH9 chipset. Looking
at the driver I noticed:
/* BAM, CAM, DBM, FBM, GxM
{ PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0x2448) }, */
/* BA,
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 02:01:05 PM Shawn Starr wrote:
> Hello network driver folks,
To follow up, this is fixed now in 3.6.7-5.fc18.x86_64
[38936.525226] e1000e :00:19.0: eth0: changing MTU from 9000 to 1500
[38936.539510] e1000e :00:19.0: Interrupt Throttle Rate turned
Hello kernel folks,
I recently decided to reinstall my Lenovo W500 laptop and found I wasn't able
to get DHCP leases, I wasn't able to install over PXE (when getting the IP a
second time within the OS)
Fedora is currently using kernel-3.6.2-2.fc18.x86_64 (Pre-beta)
The only difference I notice
Hello kernel folks,
I have an old 2.0 USB card reader, Linux detects the device but is not able to
mount the storage device.
I tried it in both a KVM Windows VM and in Linux to mount the storage but
device hangs, if I take out card, it detects all 6 device storage capabilities,
then it detects
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 04:12:18 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> >> > How about just using:
> >> > if (!HAS_GMBUS_IRQ(dev_priv->dev)) gmbus4_irq_en = 0;
> >> >
> >> > and the existing wait loop?
> >>
> >> I explicitly wanted to avoid touchi
Hello folks,
All of a sudden, it worked fine in Linux kernel 3.8, I believe after booting
Linux kernel 3.9 (which has ALSA HDA changes). I can no longer hear audio from
speakers on laptop. If I plug in headphones audio works.
[ 18.434846] hda_codec: CX20561 (Hermosa): BIOS auto-probing.
[ 18.43
On Friday, March 08, 2013 03:06:12 PM Shawn Starr wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> All of a sudden, it worked fine in Linux kernel 3.8, I believe after booting
> Linux kernel 3.9 (which has ALSA HDA changes). I can no longer hear audio
> from speakers on laptop. If I plug in headpho
Hello kernel folks,
I am seeing problems with snapshot 3.8.0-0.rc3.git1.2 [fc19].
Processes hanging after it appears unmounting my mmc0 (SD) card, I will attempt
to reproduce but, I am unclear if the two are related at this moment
[ 9127.631555] mmc0: new high speed SDHC card at address 1234
I've had 0, Ziltch problems with ReiserFS at the moment. It's solid for
me.
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> If I get the DVD stuff working, then I won't need NT anymore, i.e.
> I will have an empty disk.
>
> What is your impression about ReiserFS? Does it work? Is it st
You should be ok :)
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Jeff Chua wrote:
>
> Does anybody have bad experience with gcc-2.95.3?
>
> I'm using gcc-2.95.2 with linux 2.4.3 and have no problem with it.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
> [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe li
Note: I'm not on this mailing list (for now, domain IP is changing).
Please email directly
1) I've noticed very high CPU load 3.00 running ./configure alone
2) some gnome applications (Gnome Mailcheck broke with 2.4.4-pre5)
3) Resolving local domains takes an awful long time (though netscape)
hmmm this is my chipset:
Which motherboard do you have?
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 430HX - 82439HX TXC [Triton II] (rev 03)
00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 ISA [Natoma/Triton II] (rev 01)
00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 IDE [Natoma/Triton II
grep -r "216.234.235.46" *
...waiting...
./debugps | more
USER PID COMMAND WCHAN
root 1 init do_select
root 7 [kreiserfsd] -
.
root 28438 grep -r 216.234. pipe_wait
Im using grep in /etc and its just waiting
it should have finis
2.10r
Net-tools 1.58
Console-tools 0.2.3
Sh-utils 2.0j
Modules Loaded nls_cp437 vfat fat
Shawn Starr wrote:
> grep -r "216.234.235.46" *
>
> ...waiting...
>
> ./debugps | more
> USER PID COMMAND
Any idea if suspend/hybernation will be in future kernels?
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org
ALL YOUR LINUX ARE BELONG TO US ;-)
*snicker*
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
My friend has Linux on an Pentium Overdrive system I've attached the
dmesg and kern.log files.
Shawn.
Linux version 2.4.2-pre4 (root@stucko) (gcc version 2.95.3 20010125 (prerelease)) #1
Mon Feb 19 18:37:12 EST 2001
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
BIOS-88: 0009f000 @
Feb 23 03:31:18 coredump kernel: __alloc_pages: 3-order allocation
failed.
Feb 23 03:31:18 coredump kernel: __alloc_pages: 3-order allocation
failed.
Feb 23 03:31:18 coredump kernel: __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation
failed.
Feb 23 03:31:18 coredump kernel: __alloc_pages: 3-order allocation
failed
Ok apply patch and loop patch... I'll let you know what happens in my next
email.
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> > Feb 23 03:31:18 coredump kernel: __alloc_pages: 3-order allocation
> > failed.
> > Feb 23 03:31:18 coredump k
failed.
Feb 23 21:17:47 coredump kernel: __alloc_pages: 3-order allocation failed.
Feb 23 21:17:47 coredump kernel: __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed.
Feb 23 21:17:47 coredump kernel: __alloc_pages: 1-order allocation failed.
didnt, work, still causing this..
Shawn Starr wrote:
> Ok apply pa
Doing so..., Im not sure hot to use ksymoops or where to get that program.
I just usually use the sysq and dump but its ugly ;-)
Shawn.
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> > Feb 23 21:17:47 coredump kernel: __alloc_pages: 3-order allocation failed
Ok, I copied the part from kern.log and pasted it into a separate file then ran
ksysoops and it appeared to have worked.
Any more info you need?
Shawn.
Shawn Starr wrote:
> Doing so..., Im not sure hot to use ksymoops or where to get that program.
> I just usually use the sysq and du
I cant tell you.
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> > Unsure, the system remains stable after the fault though, strangely /dev/dsp
> > becomes "busy". I suspect it has to do with this somehow.. but im not sure.
> > I submitted a ksymo
Well, I Discovered, something strange. I put in a blank new CD-R, so these
errors are not of concern? (In which case why have the kernel log get
spewed with them if they are guaranteed to happen?)
Shawn.
--
Hugged a Tux today? (tm)
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> The way sg_low_m
It may not be an important message but what does happen is /dev/dsp becomes
hung and no sound works after the fault. So something is definately wrong.
Shawn.
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > We can add an allocation flag (__GFP_NO_CRITICAL?) which can be use
When added with BUG(); it will hang /dev/dsp.
I'm not sure if it did without it. I'll be restarting with the removed
BUG(); soon.
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> > It may not be an important message but what d
hehe, your not the only one getting that :)
I get it from the sg.o module. (it appears).
Aaron Sethman wrote:
> __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed.
>
> I get many of these across the console when testing a network application
> that. Basically the client opens up a bunch of connections to
init/main.o: In function `check_fpu':
init/main.o(.text.init+0x53): undefined reference to
`__buggy_fxsr_alignment'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
On compiling (and recompiling) i get this fatal error. This function
does not exist anymore?
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list
exist anymore?
Anyone else having this problem?
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
e
>
> init/main.o: In function `check_fpu':
> init/main.o(.text.init+0x53): undefined reference to `__buggy_fxsr_alignment'
>
> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
>
> On compiling (and recompiling) i get this fatal error. This function
> does not exist anymore?
>
>
if (offsetof(struct task_struct,
thread.i387.fxsave) & 15) {
extern void __buggy_fxsr_alignment(void);
__buggy_fxsr_alignment();
Where is this function? Where is it defined? When i grep the
whole dir i dont see this function anywhere?
Shawn.
Shawn Starr wrote:
e i th
Well, when i Make bzImage it uses -O2 for optimization. Is there any fix? change
the optimization to -O0 ?
Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:02:15PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > Nope, its not ;/
> >
> > Im on a Intel Pentium 200Mhz PC, 64MB RAM,
> >
&
Here's something strange that i've been noticing with 2.4.0. Some websites I am
unable to access now. For example:
http://www.scotiabank.ca/simplify/index.html
if your in Canada and you have Scotia banking online, try and access their
banking sites. It will just hang. However upon trying the sam
o access a site behind
> such a firewall (some of which are major sites, at the time of this
> writing) you will have to disable this option, either by saying N now
> or by using the sysctl.
>
> Shawn Starr wrote:
> >
> > Here's something strange that i&
GCC 2.96/2.97 because they will break my binary compatability with
pgcc-2.95.2/3.
Thanks,
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
> if (offsetof(struct task_struct, thread.i387.fxsave) & 15)
> panic("Kernel compiled for PII/PIII+ with FXSR, data not 16-byte
aligned!");
>
90a91,92
Jes Sorensen wrote:
> >>>>> "Shawn" == Shawn Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
Yes, it appears the PGCC patches *BREAK* GCC (go figure). 2.4.1-pre7 compiled
fine. JUST as pre8 was released *sigh*
oh well, at least now I wont have to worry about any compiler bugs (unless
some are discovered with 2.95.2) ;)
Shawn.
Shawn Starr wrote:
> Fair enough, but something in bug
What is the best way to apply a patch on top of a patch already applied?
For example, with original sources 2.4.0 i applied 2.4.1pre7 but now
that pre8 is out, how do i apply those new patches without having to
delete the whole linux dir and untar 2.4.0 again just to apply pre8?
thanks,
Shawn S
Thanks to everyone who replied :)
Sven Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> > What is the best way to apply a patch on top of a patch already applied?
> >
> > For example, with original sources 2.4.0 i applied 2.4.1pre7 but now
> > that pre8 is
In 2.4.1-pre8, this info appears in dmesg:
SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
scsi0 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices
Vendor: YAMAHAModel: CRW2100E Rev: 1.0H
Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
hdc: YAMAHA CRW2100E, ATAPI CD/DVD-
: hdc: ATAPI 40X CD-ROM CD-R/RW drive,
8192kB Cache, (U)DMA
the standard ATAPI detects this correctly.
Shawn Starr wrote:
> In 2.4.1-pre8, this info appears in dmesg:
>
> SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
> scsi0 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices
> Vendor:
Can this be confirmed?
Shawn Starr wrote:
> Just a while ago, my system just started acting funny. I couldn't use w,
> top, ps, and then some of my X applications started to freeze too.
> I couldn't even kill those hung processes because they'd hang too. So
> When
It it just me or does it seem that 2.4.x has some latency problems?
It just seems that since using 2.4 ive noticed my poor Pentium 200Mhz
slow down whether being in X or otherwise. It just seems that the system
is sluggish.
I am using the new ReiserFS filesystem and I do know its still in heavy
Where can i get the patch?
I can apply it right now.
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 02:50:16PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > It just seems that since using 2.4 ive noticed my poor Pentium 200Mhz
> > slow down whether being in X or otherwise. It just seems
I've included the TPT latency timings.
Do these look normal?
These tests occured in X with netscape and gnomeicu.
It should be noted that /dev/tty12 is being used for syslog info for
console.
Shawn.
Destination Count Min Max Average
To
These results were based on the latest alpha 2.4.1-pre series kernel.
Do they look ok?
Shawn Starr wrote:
> I've included the TPT latency timings.
>
> Do these look normal?
>
> These tests occured in X with netscape and gnomeicu.
>
> It should be noted that /dev/tty1
; > On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 02:50:16PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> >> It just seems that since using 2.4 ive noticed my poor Pentium 200Mhz
> >> slow down whether being in X or otherwise. It just seems that the system
> >> is sluggish.
> >>
> >> I am us
This is not a kernel bug, This is a bug in the XFree86 TrueType rendering
extention. This has been discussed on the Xpert XFree86 mailing list. There
is a fix in the works (depends on the TrueType fonts your using).
Unless otherwise, Im using 2.4.1-pre9 with no such faults (XFree86 CVS
X11R6.5.1
FAT32 for
the filesystem.
When I rebooted into Win2k the system did not detect a corrupt FAT.
Im going to compile 2.2.19ac3 today and see if this was a known issue or
not.
I dont know what information I can give you other then what the log
shows.
Thanks,
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from
bleh, ignore that. I fixed the problem. dont know what I did though but its
ok now..
Shawn Starr wrote:
Dec 28 09:31:59 coredump kernel: Filesystem panic (dev 03:41).
> Dec 28 09:31:59 coredump kernel: FAT error
> Dec 28 09:31:59 coredump kernel: File system has been set read-only
&g
m (rw)
the shmfs is mounted. Is there any configuration i need to get shm
memory activiated?
Thanks,
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
ahh ok, so everythings fine then. It would be nice though to see that
value perhaps in future they'll be a way.
Thanks,
Shawn.
Doug McNaught wrote:
> Shawn Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > [spstarr@coredump /etc]$ free
> > total used
Odd, Isn't 777 insecure for shared memory segments?
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, David Ford wrote:
> (cc: to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - this
> should be the last post to LKML for this subject)
>
> Known historical items:
>
> -All shm segments get used up in very fast order.
> -Every
Unfortunately. I hope some of those key developers see this is a time to
"Let's fix our security problems". Ie, GNOME, etc...
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, David Ford wrote:
> gnome, kde, enlightenment...these are just a few of the "let's give everyone
> access" utilities.
>
> -d
>
> "Mohammad A. Haqu
I have included the ksymoops debug and dmesg (both small).. Any ideas?
Shawn.
ksymoops 2.3.7 on i586 2.4.3-pre4. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.3-pre4/ (default)
-m /boot/System.map (specified)
Intel
I have included the ksymoops debug and dmesg (both small).. Any ideas?
Shawn.
ksymoops 2.3.7 on i586 2.4.3-pre4. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.3-pre4/ (default)
-m /boot/System.map (specified)
Intel Pe
Some CDROMS can do this, My old Acer 12x cdrom was fighting with DMA with
my new Fujitsu drive, I disabled the cd-rom and no more DMA errors ;-)
You might also be able to fix this by rearranging the CD-ROM and drives:
move the CD-ROM off the HD's IDE chain and put it separate (if its not
already
I disagree, 2.4.x is "stable" and as such we need as many people to use
the kernels to see whats wrong with them. 2.4 *DOES* Work, I've had very
small problems (ok, the thread hanging issue was a big one) but other then
that It's been solid.
It depends on the hardware.
Shawn.
On Tue, 27 Mar 2
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-5329436.html?tag=lh
Isn't it time to change the ELF format to stop this crap?
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majo
Why not make a new file permission?
to deny a ELF binary the ability to modify the ELF entry point?
like +p if the file had +p (by default) the kernel would deny the ELF
binary the ability to modify files.
Shawn.
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> http://news.cnet.com/news/
eally dont know what).
Even if it's user level, this cant affect files with root permissions
(unless root is running them or suid).
Any idea?
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:16:02AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001
hen need to grab the laptop and travel.
> Id' like to see this working nice in 2.6.
>
> Best regards,
> r
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:43:08 +0100
> > From: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Sh
Na, thats ok, that's just a dumping of debug info :)
Not to worry.
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Denis Perchine wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got the following lines in dmesg:
>
> freesibling
> task PCstack pid father child younger older
> in
Carlo Scarfoglio wrote:
> Compilation ends with an error:
> init.main.o: In function 'check_fpu':
> init/main.o(.text.init+0x63): undefined reference to
> '__buggy_fxsr_alignment'
> make: *** vmlinux] Error 1
> Kernel 2.4.0 compiles OK.
>
I had this problem, If your using PGCC 2.95.2/3 or any ot
True, It's just odd that we're having the same problem with the X server, so its
a double whammy ;)
Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Shawn Starr wrote:
> > This is not a kernel bug, This is a bug in the XFree86 TrueType rendering
> > extention. This has been discussed on the X
I noticed this problem in 2.4.1-pre8.
Odd, thats EXACLY what happened to me. I had to do a hard restart as killall
locked when i tried to kill ps.
Any word on why this is happening?
Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:34:26PM +1100, John Sheahan wrote:
> > Hi
> > my box has been
ting.
>
> Note that the low-latency capability must be enabled under the
> "Processor type and features" menu, and if you also enable the
> low-latency sysctl option, you'll need to
>
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/lowlatency
>
> to make it happen. Creat
Yes, I have ReiserFS as well...hrm...
David Ford wrote:
> I can quickly and easily duplicate it on my notebook by playing music or
> mpegs in xmms. It may take a few minutes but it's guaranteed.
>
> xmms stalls flat on it's face and anything accessing /proc stalls. If I get
> the time to do it
This is what the device names are:
hda: FUJITSU MPE3064AT, ATA DISK drive
hdb: WDC AC32500H, ATA DISK drive
here's what they are with hdparm:
dev/hda:
Model=UFIJST UPM3E60A4 T , FwRev=DE0--380,
SerialNo=50256499
/dev/hdb:
Model=DW CCA2305H0
Oh, I never noticed that though. Yes, -i does display it correctly.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> > This is what the device names are:
> > hda: FUJITSU MPE3064AT, ATA DISK drive
> > hdb: WDC AC32500H, ATA DISK drive
> > he
This system is the following:
AcerOPEN AP53/AX Motherboard, Intel Pentium 200Mhz w/o MMX (1996-1997)
Chipsets: 430HX, PIIX3 (EIDE)
64MB RAM EDO 60ns (Kingston brand)
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >We've narrowed it down
yes, I should also mention I have also a SoundBlaster 32AWE (0MB on the daughterboard).
J Sloan wrote:
> OK, here's the details you asked about:
>
> Soundblaster Awe 32 sound card
> Voodoo 3 pci video card
> Running Xfree86-4.0.0 (rpms from 3dfx.com)
> Playing unreal tournament, no special game
Andrew, the patch HAS made a difference. For example, while untaring
glibc-2.2.1.tar.gz the
system was not sluggish (mouse movements in X) etc.
Seems to be a go for latency improvements on this system.
Shawn Starr wrote:
> Applying now.
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > S
It should also be noted, that while using GCC and other tasks, the latency has
returned to 2.2
levels from my point. Before. If you want to me to do any testing I can do that.
I applied the timepegs patch:
Kernel timepegs enabled. See http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/
Shawn.
> >
> > Andre
Patch appears to work,
for i in [0-9]*; do echo $i; cat $i/stat > /dev/null; done
completes successfully with xmms running in "real-time" priority.
Shawn.
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > >
> > >
Will this patch work with the low-latency patch? I have a few other patches in this
kernel (one
fixing the ps hang issue).
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Shawn Starr wrote:
> >
> > Andrew, the patch HAS made a difference. For example, while untaring
>glibc-2.2.1.tar.gz the
> >
in include/linux/mm.h:
-extern void zap_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
unsigned long size, int actions);
+extern void zap_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
unsigned long size)
The function has changed and breaks memory.c ?
memory.c:352: conflicting
Nevermind, the low-latency patch changed this function.. ignore
Shawn Starr wrote:
> in include/linux/mm.h:
>
> -extern void zap_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> unsigned long size, int actions);
> +extern void zap_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsign
> Andrew Morton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, I've backed out of the low-latency patch but kept the timepegs patch in.
I've applied your reiserfs low-latency patch on a stock 2.4.1-pre11 kernel.
Let's see what happens :)
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
snip from dmesg:
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
PCI: Cannot allocate resource region 0 of device 00:09.0
got res[1000:10ff] for resource 0 of ATI Technologies Inc 3D
Rage I/II 215GT [Mach64 GT]
Limiting direct PCI/PCI transfers.
What does this mean?
The video card should be using irq 10 ac
Bleh, too bad you can't flash onboard chipsets ;/
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 430HX - 82439HX TXC [Triton II]
(rev 03)
00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 ISA [Natoma/Triton
II] (rev 01)
00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 IDE
[Natoma/Triton II]
Mark
pgcc borks 2.4.1 kernel and prereleases (sadly I found this out the same
way).
Shawn.
Matt Yourst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to compile 2.4.1 and I'm getting the error "undefined
> reference to `__buggy_fxsr_alignment'" when trying to do the final
> link. It looks like this check was somethin
[root@coredump spstarr]# killall -9 gnomeicu
... waiting...
spstarr 67 -bashread_chan
root68 /sbin/mingetty t read_chan
root69 /sbin/mingetty t read_chan
root73 inetddo_select
root74 xfs do_select
spstarr 83 -bash
Here's more info with the SYSQ in kern.log, This is the only info I have that
the kernel reports right now.
Shawn.
Shawn Starr wrote:
> [root@coredump spstarr]# killall -9 gnomeicu
>
> ... waiting...
>
> spstarr 67 -bashread_chan
> root68 /sb
[root@coredump /proc]# cd 9338
[root@coredump 9338]# ls
Feb 3 17:57:08 coredump kernel: gnomeicu S CD17 0 9338
1(NOTLB)9340 9332
Feb 3 17:57:08 coredump kernel: Call Trace: [search_by_key+203/3232]
[search_for_position_by_key+170/916] [make_cpu_key+57/64] [$
Feb 3 17:57:
Ok, I rebooted the system, then syslogd was using 100% cpu?
it seems like perhaps reiserfs is causing this problem??
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Wasn't on shutdown though ;-)
I was just about to receive a message when things started to lock up slowly.
Then everything else followed.
Marko Kreen wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 05:48:36PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > [root@coredump spstarr]# killall -9 gnomeicu
>
Adding now.. I just applied 2.4.1-ac2 and now i'll add this code snipet to the source.
It might take 4 days or so for the bug to show itself. At least, unless it triggers
eariler (?)
Restarting...
Shawn.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >Feb 3 17:5
Ok, ive added change. Im starting the applications that were running at the time of
the hang. XMMS, gnomeicu, a few consoles etc.
Let's see what happens.
Shawn.
Shawn Starr wrote:
> Adding now.. I just applied 2.4.1-ac2 and now i'll add this code snipet to the
>source. It m
Well, strangely, it stopped as it started?
I don't know what caused it to go loopy but then it just stopped. Im using:
syslogd -ver
syslogd 1.4-0
klogd -v
klogd 1.4-0
I thought this only affected older versions?
Shawn.
Alan Cox wrote:
> > Ok, I rebooted the system, then syslogd was using 10
Well, i found something in my logs:
This really is weird :)
Shawn.
Alan Cox wrote:
> > Well, strangely, it stopped as it started?
> > I don't know what caused it to go loopy but then it just stopped. Im using:
> > syslogd -ver
> > syslogd 1.4-0
> >
> > klogd -v
> > klogd 1.4-0
> >
> > I though
Its supposed to, its too costly to calculate shared memory with the new VM
I'm told.
Shawn.
LA Walsh wrote:
> Another oddity -- I notice things taking alot more memory
> in 2.4. This coincides with 'top' consistently showing I have 0 shared
> memory. These two observations would have me wonde
haha thats funny, I just compiled 2.4.2-pre2 ;-)
oh well...time to patch again.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Nothing too radical here..
>
> Linus
>
>
> -pre3:
> - Jens: better ordering of requests when unable to merge
> - Neil Brown: make md work as a module again (we cannot
Does the current (E)IDE driver support SMART?
Will Linux report any S.M.A.R.T errors or warnings to the system log?
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
I'm working o
--- Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I've noticed something strange with issuing
> 'standby' to the system:
> >
> > when echoing "standby" to /sys/power/state,
> nothing happens, not even a log or
> > system activity to attempt standby mode.
> >
> > However, tr
So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG option marked as Deprecated? :)
Shawn.
>
> > Do you know if /proc/acpi/sleep will be deprecated in
> > favour of /sys/power/state? If so, this thread will be
> > moot ;)
>
> No idea, deprecating it would be ok with me.
>
>Pavel
pgpGfWAs0n7J0.
Yeah, I can do that, I don't need angry programmers
chasing after me :-)
Shawn.
--- Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG
> option marked as Deprecated? :)
>
> Actually it should probably go through
>
> Documentation/feature-removal-s
Shouldn't IPMI be using /sys instead /proc? I thought
we're trying to cleanup /proc?
---
List: linux-kernel
Subject:RE: [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to
ipmi_poweroff module
From:
Date: 2005-04-08 15:53:54
Message-ID:
[Download message RAW]
The message ha
I've noticed that when I do a suspend to disk. The
machine suspends PCI devices once (I notice this
because the ipw2200 wireless card shows its
suspending, then it locks/parks the HD heads, but then
all PCI devices are woken up and resume. The HD spins
up and then dumps memory contents to swap part
I notice in Linux and in XP the drive bay light
remains on while the laptop is in suspend-to-RAM. I
know the ACPI thinkpad extras added to the kernel
recently can turn this off. I wonder if we can/or need
to write hooks to turn the light off so to conserve
power when we're in S3
Thoughts?
Shawn.
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
