Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (mfd: AB3100 - ab3100_probe: undefined reference to `rand_initialize_irq')

2012-07-17 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20120716: >> >> The vfs tree lost its build failure. >> >> The l2-mtd tree gained a conflict agains

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (mfd: AB3100 - ab3100_probe: undefined reference to `rand_initialize_irq')

2012-07-17 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20120716: >>> >>> The vfs t

[PATCH -next] random: Remove remaining relicts of rand_initialize_irq()

2012-07-17 Thread Sedat Dilek
0120717) on a Ubuntu/precise AMD64 host. [ v2: Polish up subject and commit message ] Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c |1 - drivers/mfd/ab3100-core.c |2 -- include/linux/random.h |2 -- 3 files changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/ir

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17

2012-07-18 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20120716: > Out of curiosity (and normally you are giving a reason why there is...) no new Tree for July 18? - Sedat - -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Re: linux-next: Trees and MAINTAINERS of random drivers?

2012-07-18 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:15 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 13:09 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> 26 dwmw2 git >> git://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/random-2.6.git#master > > I'm misusing the word 'random' to mean 'miscellaneous

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (mfd: AB3100 - ab3100_probe: undefined reference to `rand_initialize_irq')

2012-07-18 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> ...looks like AB3100 is the *only* driver still using >>> rand_initialize_irq()... >>&g

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (debugobjects: bt | btusb | usb related?)

2012-07-20 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 08:06:17PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Changes since 20120716: >> >

Re: Clang patch stacks for LTS kernels (v4.4 and v4.9) and status update

2018-05-22 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:54 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > Sedat, > Thanks for the report. We have a fix ready in > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37512. Can you report what > version of clang you were using and if earlier versions of clang have > this issue? > Thanks, Can you give some

Re: Clang patch stacks for LTS kernels (v4.4 and v4.9) and status update

2018-05-22 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:54 AM, Nick Desaulniers > wrote: >> Sedat, >> Thanks for the report. We have a fix ready in >> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37512. Can you report what >> version of clang

Re: Clang patch stacks for LTS kernels (v4.4 and v4.9) and status update

2018-05-22 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:04 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:54 AM, Nick Desaulniers >> wrote: >>> Sedat, >>> Thanks for the report. We have a fix ready in >>> https://bug

Re: Clang patch stacks for LTS kernels (v4.4 and v4.9) and status update

2018-05-22 Thread Sedat Dilek
*args)); + mcs = xen_mc_entry(mc_entry_size); args = mcs.args; args->op.arg2.vcpumask = to_cpumask(args->mask); -- 2.17.0 From 81eceff6658d6e750c7c0d0810ec3d6e66a0cd51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sedat Dilek Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 12:00:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] compiler-clang.

Re: Clang patch stacks for LTS kernels (v4.4 and v4.9) and status update

2018-05-22 Thread Sedat Dilek
For the sake of completeness... [ CLANG VERSION ] # dpkg -l | grep clang-7 ii clang-7 1:7~svn332830-1~exp1+0~20180521091322.1776~1.gbp198359 amd64C, C++ and Objective-C compiler [ OBJDUMP native_save_fl() ] $ objdump -d -S --start-address=0x$(grep native_save_fl System.map | sed -e "s/

Re: Clang patch stacks for LTS kernels (v4.4 and v4.9) and status update

2018-05-22 Thread Sedat Dilek
Just for the records... [ OBJDUMP irq_work_tick() ] $ objdump -d -S --start-address=0x$(grep irq_work_tick System.map | sed -e "s/ \+.*//") vmlinux | less [ OBJDUMP native_save_fl() ] $ objdump -d -S --start-address=0x$(grep native_save_fl System.map | sed -e "s/ \+.*//") vmlinux | less - seda

[2/3] x86/build: use -std=gnu89 for proper extern inline semantics

2018-06-04 Thread Sedat Dilek
[ CC me I'am not subscribed to LKML and linux-kbuild ] [ Unsure if this the complete CC list of the original posting [0] ] Hi, I am discovering clang's compiler flags as HPA writes in [0]... "-fgnu-inlines would be a better option. We could also simply #define inline inline __attribute__((gnu_i

Re: [PATCH v3] Makefile: lld: tell clang to use lld

2019-04-02 Thread Sedat Dilek
x/issues/366 > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/357 > Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor > Suggested-by: Masahiro Yamada > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers Thanks for bringing this up again, Nick. Suggested-by: Sedat Dilek (see [1]). I suggest to do a separate patch on

CBL issue #431: lld: x86_64: sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename $module/.rodata.cst{16,32}

2019-04-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Denys, I fell over your commit "crypto: x86 - make constants readonly, allow linker to merge them" [1] while digging into ClangBuiltLinux issue 431 [0]. I see the following in my dmesg-log: $ grep sysfs: dmesg_5.0.4-rc1-1-amd64-cbl-asmgoto.txt [Fri Mar 22 10:32:09 2019] sysfs: cannot create d

Re: CBL issue #431: lld: x86_64: sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename $module/.rodata.cst{16,32}

2019-04-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > On 4/8/19 3:56 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > I propose to change section name, append _module_ name and optionally > > a comment why this is done: > > > > /* NB: section is mergeable, all elements must be aligned 16-byte blocks > > */ > >

Re: CBL issue #431: lld: x86_64: sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename $module/.rodata.cst{16,32}

2019-04-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:29 PM Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > On 4/8/19 4:23 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > For the .rodata.cst16 part you mean sth. like this? > > yes, see below > > > --- a/arch/x86/crypto/camellia-aesni-avx-asm_64.S > > +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/camellia

Re: CBL issue #431: lld: x86_64: sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename $module/.rodata.cst{16,32}

2019-04-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:42 PM Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > On 4/8/19 4:34 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > v2: > > > > sdi@iniza:~/src/linux-kernel/linux$ git --no-pager diff > > diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/camellia-aesni-avx-asm_64.S > > b/arch/x86/crypto/c

Re: CBL issue #431: lld: x86_64: sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename $module/.rodata.cst{16,32}

2019-04-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
We have arch/x86/crypto/chacha-avx2-x86_64.S and arch/x86/crypto/chacha-avx512vl-x86_64.S: .rodata.cst32.CTR2BL .rodata.cst32.CTR4BL .rodata.cst32.CTR2BL .rodata.cst32.CTR4BL ...and in arch/x86/crypto/sha256-avx2-asm.S and arch/x86/crypto/sha512-avx2-asm.S: .rodata.cst32.PSHUFFLE_BYTE_FLIP_MASK

Re: CBL issue #431: lld: x86_64: sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename $module/.rodata.cst{16,32}

2019-04-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:04 PM Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > On 4/8/19 4:57 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > We have arch/x86/crypto/chacha-avx2-x86_64.S and > > arch/x86/crypto/chacha-avx512vl-x86_64.S: > > > > .rodata.cst32.CTR2BL > > .rodata.cst32.CTR4BL > > .ro

Re: CBL issue #431: lld: x86_64: sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename $module/.rodata.cst{16,32}

2019-04-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:04 PM Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > On 4/8/19 4:57 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > We have arch/x86/crypto/chacha-avx2-x86_64.S and > > arch/x86/crypto/chacha-avx512vl-x86_64.S: > > > > .rodata.cst32.CTR2BL > > .rodata.cst32.CTR4BL > > .ro

Re: [PATCH] x86: entry: Remove _TIF_SINGLESTEP define leftover

2021-02-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:01 PM Kyle Huey wrote: > > Looks good to me. > Any other comments on this patch v2? Thanks. - Sedat - > - Kyle > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 1:43 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > After commit 6342adcaa683 ("entry: Ensure trap after si

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Clean up x86_32 stackprotector

2021-02-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 8:19 PM Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > x86_32 stackprotector is a maintenance nightmare. Clean it up. This > disables stackprotector on x86_32 on GCC 8.1 and on all clang > versions. Some clang people are cc'd. > > Changes from v1: > - Changelog fixes. > - Comment fixes (m

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/stackprotector/32: Make the canary into a regular percpu variable

2021-02-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
s the GS selector and updates GSBASE, which is now > always the user base. This means that the overall effect is > the same on 32-bit and 64-bit, which avoids some ifdeffery. > > Cc: Sedat Dilek > Cc: Nick Desaulniers > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski > --- > arch/

Re: [xhci] usb 4-1: reset SuperSpeed Gen 1 USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd

2021-02-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 2:44 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > Hi Mathias, > > I am here on Linux-v5.11-10201-gc03c21ba6f4e. > > I see a lot xhci-resets in my dmesg-log: > > root# LC_ALL=C dmesg -T | grep 'usb 4-1: reset SuperSpeed Gen 1 USB > device number 2 using xhci_hc

Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm/swsmu: Avoid using structure_size uninitialized in smu_cmn_init_soft_gpu_metrics

2021-02-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
ot be known. > > Fixes: de4b7cd8cb87 ("drm/amd/pm/swsmu: unify the init soft gpu metrics > function") > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1304 > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor I fell over this today with Linux v5.11-10201-gc03c21ba6f4e. Tested-by: Sedat

Re: [PATCH] qemu_fw_cfg: Make fw_cfg_rev_attr a proper kobj_attribute

2021-02-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
iltLinux/linux/issues/1299 > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor > > Looks good to me. Thank you for sending the patch! > > Reviewed-by: Sami Tolvanen > Environment: Linux v5.11-10201-gc03c21ba6f4e plus Clang-CFI as of 24-Feb-2021 on top built with LLVM v13-git. Tested-by: Sedat Dilek - Sedat -

Re: [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.1.0 version released

2021-02-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:50 AM Namjae Jeon wrote: > > Hi folk, > > We have released exfatprogs 1.1.0 version. In this release, exfatlabel > has been added to print or re-write volume label and volume serial value. > Also, A new dump.exfat util has been added to display statistics from > a given

Re: [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.1.0 version released

2021-02-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:51 AM Namjae Jeon wrote: > > Hope Sven will do a new release for Debian. > > ( Note that Debian/bullseye release plans "Milestone 2" this Friday, > > February 12th (see [1] > "Key > > release dates" > "[2021-Feb-12] Soft Freeze"). Dunno which impact this > > might hav

Re: [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.1.0 version released

2021-02-10 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 8:24 AM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:51 AM Namjae Jeon wrote: > > > > Hope Sven will do a new release for Debian. > > > ( Note that Debian/bullseye release plans "Milestone 2" this Friday, > > > Feb

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: fix duplicated flags in DEBUG_CFLAGS

2021-02-03 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:53 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > Sedat Dilek noticed duplicated debug flags passed when building C > files with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO. > > I do not know much about his build environment, but yes, Kbuild > recurses to the top Makefile with some build ta

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: fix duplicated flags in DEBUG_CFLAGS

2021-02-03 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:53 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > Sedat Dilek noticed duplicated debug flags passed when building C > files with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO. > > I do not know much about his build environment, but yes, Kbuild > recurses to the top Makefile with some build ta

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: fix duplicated flags in DEBUG_CFLAGS

2021-02-03 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 9:39 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 5:32 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:53 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > > > > Sedat Dilek noticed duplicated debug flags passed when building

Re: [PATCH v2] arch/x86: Propagate $(CLANG_FLAGS) to $(REALMODE_FLAGS)

2021-02-03 Thread Sedat Dilek
980be..412b849063ec 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/Makefile > > +++ b/arch/x86/Makefile > > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ REALMODE_CFLAGS += -ffreestanding > > REALMODE_CFLAGS += -fno-stack-protector > > This one too: > > checking file arch/x86/Makefile > patch: malformed patch at line 62: REALMODE_CFLAGS += > -fno-stack-protector > I needed to touch this as it was "malformed" and did not apply cleanly. If it is not too late, feel free to add my: Tested-by: Sedat Dilek - Sedat -

Re: [PATCH v7] pgo: add clang's Profile Guided Optimization infrastructure

2021-01-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:12 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:46 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > [ LLVM ] > > > > Today, I switched over to LLVM version 12.0.0-rc1. > > > > > > [ Step #1: 5.11.0-rc5-5-amd64-clan

Re: [PATCH v7] pgo: add clang's Profile Guided Optimization infrastructure

2021-01-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:24 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 1:19 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:12 PM Nick Desaulniers > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:46 PM Sedat D

Re: [PATCH v7] pgo: add clang's Profile Guided Optimization infrastructure

2021-01-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 7:41 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built Linux wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:12 AM Bill Wendling wrote: > > > > From: Sami Tolvanen > > > > Enable the use of clang's Profile-Guided Optimization[1]. To generate a > > profile, the kernel is instrumented with PGO co

Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-01-29 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 8:43 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format. > > DWARF5 wins significantly in terms of size and especially so when mixed > with compression (CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_COMPRESSED). > > Link: http://www.dwarfstd.org/doc/DWARF5.pd

Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] Kbuild: implement support for DWARF v5

2021-01-29 Thread Sedat Dilek
bled for now if CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is set; pahole doesn't yet > recognize the new additions to the DWARF debug info. Thanks to Sedat for > the report. > > Link: http://www.dwarfstd.org/doc/DWARF5.pdf > Reported-by: Sedat Dilek > Suggested-by: Arvind Sankar > Sug

Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] Kbuild: implement support for DWARF v5

2021-01-29 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:48 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:41 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 8:43 PM Nick Desaulniers > > wrote: > > > > > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > > > index 201

Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] Kbuild: implement support for DWARF v5

2021-01-29 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:09 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:55 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:48 PM Nick Desaulniers > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:41 PM Sedat Dilek > > &g

Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] Kbuild: implement support for DWARF v5

2021-01-29 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:13 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:09 PM Nick Desaulniers > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:55 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:48 PM Nick Desaulniers > > > wrot

Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] Kbuild: implement support for DWARF v5

2021-01-29 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:09 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 1:20 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:13 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:09 PM Nick Desaulniers > > > wrote:

Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] Kbuild: implement support for DWARF v5

2021-01-29 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:21 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:11 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:09 PM Nick Desaulniers > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 1:20 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > &

Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] Kbuild: implement support for DWARF v5

2021-01-29 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:31 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:23 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:21 PM Nick Desaulniers > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:11 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > &

Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-01-29 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 8:43 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format. > > DWARF5 wins significantly in terms of size and especially so when mixed > with compression (CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_COMPRESSED). > > Link: http://www.dwarfstd.org/doc/DWARF5.pd

Re: [PATCH v2] vmlinux.lds.h: Define SANTIZER_DISCARDS with CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL=y

2021-01-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 1:27 AM Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > clang produces .eh_frame sections when CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL is enabled, > even when -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables is in KBUILD_CFLAGS: > > $ make CC=clang vmlinux > ... > ld: warning: orphan section `.eh_frame' from `init/main.o' being p

Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] Kbuild: implement support for DWARF v5

2021-01-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
bled for now if CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is set; pahole doesn't yet > recognize the new additions to the DWARF debug info. Thanks to Sedat for > the report. > > Link: http://www.dwarfstd.org/doc/DWARF5.pdf > Reported-by: Sedat Dilek > Suggested-by: Arvind Sankar > Sug

Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] Kbuild: implement support for DWARF v5

2021-01-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 12:10 AM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 1:44 AM Nick Desaulniers > wrote: > > > > DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format. > > > > Feature detection of DWARF5 is onerous, especially given that we

Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-01-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 1:44 AM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format. > > DWARF5 wins significantly in terms of size and especially so when mixed > with compression (CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_COMPRESSED). > > Link: http://www.dwarfstd.org/doc/DWARF5.pd

Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] Kbuild: implement support for DWARF v5

2021-01-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 1:37 AM Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 3:10 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 1:44 AM Nick Desaulniers > > wrote: > > > > > > DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format.

Re: [PATCH] scripts: switch some more scripts explicitly to Python 3

2021-02-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:10 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 3:28 AM Nick Desaulniers > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 5:08 PM Masahiro Yamada > > wrote: > > > > > > For the same reason as commit 51839e29cb59 ("scripts: switch explicitly > > > to Python 3"), switch

Re: [PATCH v2] scripts/clang-tools: switch explicitly to Python 3

2021-02-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:06 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > For the same reason as commit 51839e29cb59 ("scripts: switch explicitly > to Python 3"), switch some more scripts, which I tested and confirmed > working on Python 3. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > Acked-by: Nathan Chancellor > ---

Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-02-03 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 7:40 AM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format. > > DWARF5 wins significantly in terms of size and especially so when mixed > with compression (CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_COMPRESSED). > > Link: http://www.dwarfstd.org/doc/DWARF5.pdf

Re: [PATCH] bpf: Hoise pahole version checks into Kconfig

2021-02-03 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 12:07 AM Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 02:38:27PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > Hm.. Just saw Linus proposing using $(error-if) in Kconfig for an > > unrelated issue ([0]). If we can make this work, then it would catch > > such issue early on, yet

Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-02-04 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:45 AM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 10:58 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > I guess I need to test harder to get a Tested-by credit :-)? > > You're right Sedat, I'm sorry. Your testing is invaluable; thank you > for

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-02-04 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 3:58 AM Andrii Nakryiko wrote: ... > > Is there another (easy) way to get your patch set without the b4 tool? > Is your patch set present in some patchworks instance, so that I can > download it in mbox format, for example? > Just to promote the b4 tool - we have some cool

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-02-04 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 9:42 AM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 3:58 AM Andrii Nakryiko > wrote: > ... > > > > Is there another (easy) way to get your patch set without the b4 tool? > > Is your patch set present in some patchworks instance, so that

Re: [PATCH] bpf: Hoise pahole version checks into Kconfig

2021-02-04 Thread Sedat Dilek
d require pahole to be installed with an > appropriate version to select and use CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF, which is > standard for options that require a specific tools version. > > Suggested-by: Sedat Dilek > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor > --- > MAINTAINERS | 1

Re: ANNOUNCE: pahole v1.20 (gcc11 DWARF5's default, lots of ELF sections, BTF)

2021-02-04 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:07 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Hi, > > The v1.20 release of pahole and its friends is out, mostly > addressing problems related to gcc 11 defaulting to DWARF5 for -g, > available at the usual places: > Congrats and thanks for v1.20 and to all involved

Re: ERROR: INT DW_ATE_unsigned_1 Error emitting BTF type

2021-02-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 4:28 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 04:23:59PM +0100, Sedat Dilek escreveu: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 3:41 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 3:37 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > >

Re: ERROR: INT DW_ATE_unsigned_1 Error emitting BTF type

2021-02-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 6:48 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 4:28 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > wrote: > > > > Em Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 04:23:59PM +0100, Sedat Dilek escreveu: > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 3:41 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > &

Re: ERROR: INT DW_ATE_unsigned_1 Error emitting BTF type

2021-02-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 7:53 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 6:48 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 4:28 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > wrote: > > > > > > Em Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 04:23:59PM +0100, Sedat Dilek escrev

Re: ERROR: INT DW_ATE_unsigned_1 Error emitting BTF type

2021-02-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:10 PM Yonghong Song wrote: > > > > On 2/5/21 11:06 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 7:53 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 6:48 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > >>> > >>> On Fri,

Re: ERROR: INT DW_ATE_unsigned_1 Error emitting BTF type

2021-02-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:15 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:10 PM Yonghong Song wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2/5/21 11:06 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 7:53 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > >> >

Re: ERROR: INT DW_ATE_unsigned_1 Error emitting BTF type

2021-02-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:21 PM Yonghong Song wrote: > > > > On 2/5/21 11:15 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:10 PM Yonghong Song wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2/5/21 11:06 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >>> On Fri, Fe

Re: ERROR: INT DW_ATE_unsigned_1 Error emitting BTF type

2021-02-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:30 PM Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:21 AM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:15 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:10 PM Yonghong Song wrote: > > > > > &g

Re: ERROR: INT DW_ATE_unsigned_1 Error emitting BTF type

2021-02-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:21 PM Yonghong Song wrote: > > > > On 2/5/21 11:15 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:10 PM Yonghong Song wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2/5/21 11:06 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >>> On Fri, Fe

Re: ERROR: INT DW_ATE_unsigned_1 Error emitting BTF type

2021-02-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 9:03 PM Yonghong Song wrote: > > > > On 2/5/21 11:24 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:10:08AM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu: > >> On 2/5/21 11:06 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 7:5

[PATCH] x86: entry: Remove _TIF_SINGLESTEP define leftover

2021-02-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
all return" CC: Kyle Huey Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h index 0d751d5da702..8861967e0305 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_i

[PATCH v2] x86: entry: Remove _TIF_SINGLESTEP define leftover

2021-02-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
ll return") CC: Kyle Huey Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- Changes v1->v2: - Add closing parenthesis to Fixes tag arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h index 0d751d5da7

Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Move feature cleanup under tools/build

2021-02-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
hecks that > there's existing OUTPUT directory before calling the clean. > > Cc: Sedat Dilek For my new friends from linux-bpf and linux-perf... I tested your patch on top of Linux v5.11-10201-gc03c21ba6f4e. git checkout c03c21ba6f4e -b for-5.12/perf-tools_feature_cleanup-jolsa git br

Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] Kbuild: DWARF v5 support

2021-02-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 9:22 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > DWARF v5 is the latest standard of the DWARF debug info format. > > DWARF5 wins significantly in terms of size and especially so when mixed > with compression (CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_COMPRESSED). > > Link: http://www.dwarfstd.org/doc/DWARF5.pdf

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] arm64: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION

2021-02-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 12:21 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > From: Arnd Bergmann > > When looking at kernel size optimizations, I found that arm64 > does not currently support HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION, > which enables the --gc-sections flag to the linker. > > I see that for a defconfig bui

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] arm64: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION

2021-02-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 9:14 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 1:36 AM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 12:21 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > From: Arnd Bergmann > > > > > > When looking at kernel

Re: [PATCH v2] kbuild: fix UNUSED_KSYMS_WHITELIST for Clang LTO

2021-02-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 7:26 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > Commit fbe078d397b4 ("kbuild: lto: add a default list of used symbols") > does not work as expected if the .config file has already specified > CONFIG_UNUSED_KSYMS_WHITELIST="my/own/white/list" before enabling > CONFIG_LTO_CLANG. > > So, t

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] arm64: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION

2021-02-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:51 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:05 AM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 9:14 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > BTW, is CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION=y setable for x86 (64bit)? > >

Re: [PATCH v2] kbuild: fix UNUSED_KSYMS_WHITELIST for Clang LTO

2021-02-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 7:55 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 6:26 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 7:26 AM Masahiro Yamada > > wrote: > > > > > > Commit fbe078d397b4 ("kbuild: lto: add a default list of

Re: [PATCH v2] kbuild: fix UNUSED_KSYMS_WHITELIST for Clang LTO

2021-02-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 8:08 AM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 7:55 AM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 6:26 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 7:26 AM Masahiro Yamada > > > wrote: >

Re: [PATCHSET v5 0/12] Add support for async buffered reads

2020-05-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
> Time to experience with ZRAM :-). I switched over from swap-file to zramswap. And I can definitely say, my last kernel w/o your patchset does not show the symptoms. # cat systemd-analyze-time_5.7.0-rc7-2-amd64-clang_2nd-try.txt Startup finished in 6.129s (kernel) + 44.192s (userspace) = 50.322

Re: [PATCHSET v5 0/12] Add support for async buffered reads

2020-05-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
Here are the numbers with your patchset: # cat systemd-analyze-time_5.7.0-rc7-4-amd64-clang_2nd-try.txt Startup finished in 7.229s (kernel) + 1min 18.304s (userspace) = 1min 25.534s graphical.target reached after 1min 18.286s in userspace # cat systemd-analyze-blame_5.7.0-rc7-4-amd64-clang_2nd-tr

Re: [PATCHSET v5 0/12] Add support for async buffered reads

2020-05-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 9:04 AM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 3:57 AM Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > On 5/30/20 12:57 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > Here are the numbers with your patchset: > > > > > > # cat systemd-analyze-time_5.7.

[PATCH] mm/zswap.c: Fix typo accept_threshold_percent in Documentation/vm/zswap.rst

2020-05-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
: add allocation hysteresis if pool limit is hit") Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- Documentation/vm/zswap.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/vm/zswap.rst b/Documentation/vm/zswap.rst index f8c6a79d7c70..d8d9fa4a1f0d 100644 --- a/Documentation/vm

[PATCH] zswap: docs/vm: Fix typo accept_threshold_percent in zswap.rst

2020-05-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
: add allocation hysteresis if pool limit is hit") Cc: Vitaly Wool Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- Changes v1->v2: - Changed subject line - Resend to LKML with correct email-address Documentation/vm/zswap.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/v

Re: [PATCHSET v5 0/12] Add support for async buffered reads

2020-06-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Jens, with Linux v5.7 final I switched to linux-block.git/for-next and reverted... "block: read-ahead submission should imply no-wait as well" ...and see no boot-slowdowns. Regards, - Sedat -

Re: [PATCHSET v5 0/12] Add support for async buffered reads

2020-06-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:04 PM Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 6/1/20 7:35 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > Hi Jens, > > > > with Linux v5.7 final I switched to linux-block.git/for-next and reverted... > > > > "block: read-ahead submission should imply no-wait as w

Re: [PATCHSET v5 0/12] Add support for async buffered reads

2020-06-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:35 PM Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 6/1/20 8:14 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 6/1/20 8:13 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:04 PM Jens Axboe wrote: > >>> > >>> On 6/1/20 7:35 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >

Re: [PATCHSET v5 0/12] Add support for async buffered reads

2020-06-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:46 PM Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 6/1/20 8:43 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:35 PM Jens Axboe wrote: > >> > >> On 6/1/20 8:14 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > >>> On 6/1/20 8:13 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >>

Re: [PATCHSET v5 0/12] Add support for async buffered reads

2020-06-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:46 PM Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 6/1/20 8:43 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:35 PM Jens Axboe wrote: > >> > >> On 6/1/20 8:14 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > >>> On 6/1/20 8:13 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >>

Re: [GIT PULL][PATCH v5 0/8] Add support for ZSTD-compressed kernel and initramfs

2020-06-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 11:59 PM Norbert Lange wrote: > > The series seems to be stuck in limbo, and I got the hint to bring > this to Andrew's attention [1]. > Hope this will finally end in upstream, been using these patches for ~2 years. > > Regards, Norbert > > [1] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

[perf] Explicitly use python[3]-[config]

2020-07-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I wanted to have some detailed numbers for building a Linux-kernel with GNU-eco-system means GNU/gcc-10 and GNU/binutils-2,35 VS. LLVM/Clang with its utils version 11.0.0-rc1. Arnd recommended me to use "perf stat make ...". First, I tried to build it out of tools/perf from linux.git: MAKE_

Re: [perf] Explicitly use python[3]-[config]

2020-07-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 1:20 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 12:06:55PM +0200, Sedat Dilek escreveu: > > Hi, > > > > I wanted to have some detailed numbers for building a Linux-kernel > > with GNU-eco-system means GNU/gcc-10 and GNU/bi

Re: [GIT PULL][PATCH v10 0/8] Add support for ZSTD-compressed kernel and initramfs

2020-07-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
(2/7) Don't define '__DISABLE_EXPORTS' > - (6/7) Define '__DISABLE_EXPORTS' in misc.c > > v8 -> v9: > - Rebase onto v5.8-rc7 > - (2/7) Fix nits about comment style & typos > - (3/7) Fix typo in init/Kconfig description > - (6/7) Explain BOOT_HE

Re: exfatprogs-1.0.4 version released

2020-07-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 9:16 AM Namjae Jeon wrote: > > Hi folk, > > In this release, The performance of fsck have been much improved and > the new option in mkfs have been added to adjust boundary alignment. > > As the result below, The fsck performance is improved close to windows's fsck > and mu

Re: [perf] Explicitly use python[3]-[config]

2020-07-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
> Please let me know if you need further help. > > - Arnaldo Hi Arnaldo, YES, I need further help. I have published in [1] numbers for "perf stat make ..." with GNU/gcc+binutils vs. LLVM toolchain for building Linux v5.8-rc7. [ GNU/gcc+binutils toolchain ] 10964.876434769 seconds time elaps

Re: exfatprogs-1.0.4 version released

2020-07-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
> congrats to version 1.0.4 and hope to see it in the Debian repositories soon. > Thanks Sven! root# dpkg -l | grep exfatprogs | awk '/^ii/ {print $1 " " $2 " " $3}' | column -t ii exfatprogs 1.0.4-1 - Sedat -

Re: [GIT PULL][PATCH v10 0/8] Add support for ZSTD-compressed kernel and initramfs

2020-07-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 9:11 PM Nick Terrell wrote: > > From: Nick Terrell > > Please pull from > > g...@github.com:terrelln/linux.git tags/v10-zstd > > to get these changes. Alternatively the patchset is included. > > Hi all, > > This patch set adds support for a ZSTD-compressed kernel, ramdis

Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] x86/boot: Remove run-time relocations from compressed kernel

2020-07-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
at is fine, and > > > highly appreciated, but 'refreshing' the series against -next means it > > > no longer applies to -tip, and may be based on unidentified conflict > > > resolutions performed by Stephen that the maintainers will have to > > > deal with. > > > > > > Boris, Ingo, Thomas, > > > > > > Mind taking v5 of this series? (With Nick's Tested-by) I think these > > > patches have been simmering long enough. Do note there is a conflict > > > against the kbuild tree, but the resolution should be straightforward. > > > > I would love that; I need to rebase my orphan series on this too... > > > > -- > > Kees Cook > > Ping? I just tested v5 against Linux v5.8-rc7 and the conflict you mention is with: commit da05b143a308bd6a7a01f9732678ae63fc70 x86/boot: Don't add the EFI stub to targets If I forgot... Tested-by: Sedat Dilek - Sedat -

Re: [PATCH] x86: work around clang IAS bug referencing __force_order

2020-08-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
ox/6.1.12/build/vboxdrv/vboxdrv.ko] undefined! Arnd's patch is mandatory to build with Clang's Integrated Assembler (make LLVM_IAS=1). Here: LLVM toolchain version 11.0.0-rc1 Feel free to add: Reported-by: Sedat Dilek Tested-by: Sedat Dilek Can one of the tip maintainers p

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >