Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 [ call-trace: drm | drm-intel related? ]

2013-07-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Vetter > wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:27:03AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Fri

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 [ call-trace: drm | drm-intel related? ]

2013-07-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> I have compared next-20130725 VS. next-20130726: >> >> $ head -2313 next-20130725-VS-next-20130726.diff | grep ^+ | grep i915 >> + drm/i915: Colo

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 [ call-trace: drm | drm-intel related? ]

2013-07-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Daniel Vetter > wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >>> I have compared next-20130725 VS. next-20130726: >>> >>> $ head -23

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130812: > > The ext4 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > The infiniband tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge > fix patch and another so I used the version from next-20130812. > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20130812: >>> >>> The

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10:18AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> with today's next-20130813 I cannot see 1/10 of my desktop-screen's >> top, it's simply black. >> I can estimate the UR

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> After a logout from my "BROKEN" Unity-2D session - the login-screen >> for LightDM seems to be OK. >> Then entering my Unity-2D desktop is OK -

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Afte

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chris Wilson >>> wrote: >>> > On Tu

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Tue, Au

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson >>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > I have bisected the issue on Linux v3.11-rc5 + drm-intel-nightly: >> > >> > 5456fe3

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Chris Wilson > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> > I have bisected the iss

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:03:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Chris Wilson >> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 13

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:40:37PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:53:25PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Files att

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (usb-gadget tree related)

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 02:48:03PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:17:19PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc >> > allyescon

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:05:41PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:40:37PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> On Tue, A

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Tue, Au

Re: Pulling linux-next GIT

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
GitWeb service says: 503 - The load average on the server is too high - Sedat - On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hmm, cloning also not possible: > > $ LANG=C LC_ALL=C git clone > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git > Cloning i

Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the char-misc tree

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 15 February 2013, Greg KH wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 04:26:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> > >> > After merging the char-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 >> > allmodconfig) produced this warning: >> > >> > d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> Hi >> >> 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni w

Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the char-misc tree

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 01 March 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> I have seen a lot of such failures when using the Freetz (a small >> router project) build-system with gcc-4.7-x where "-Os" is default >> optimization-lev

Re: Pulling linux-next GIT

2013-03-02 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On 01/03/13 08:35 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> 2 hours passed - same problems! >> >> I looked at , but there is no message in the news area. > > Hi, all: > > We had early-morning hardware failure on the so

[git.k.o] Old linux-next WebGit points to $NewWebGitURL/tree

2013-03-02 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, invoking the old linux-next WebGit URL [0] results in [1]. [2] would be correct. Regards, - Sedat - [0] git.kernel.org - linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/summary [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/ [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next

Re: [git.k.o] Old linux-next WebGit points to $NewWebGitURL/tree

2013-03-02 Thread Sedat Dilek
[0] should be... <http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git>. - Sedat - On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > invoking the old linux-next WebGit URL [0] results in [1]. > [2] would be correct. > > Regards, > - Sedat - >

Re: [git.k.o] Old linux-next WebGit points to $NewWebGitURL/tree

2013-03-03 Thread Sedat Dilek
Same happens with ext4 GIT... OLD: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git NEW: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git/tree/ FIXED: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git - Sedat - On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote

Re: [git.k.o] gitweb->cgit: Re-add Git snapshot tarball feature

2013-03-03 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On 03/03/13 06:34 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> unfortunately, the Git snapshot tarball feature was dropped when >> switching from gitweb->cgit interface. >> >> For example the Freetz

Re: [git.k.o] gitweb->cgit: Re-add Git snapshot tarball feature

2013-03-03 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev > wrote: >> On 03/03/13 06:34 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> unfortunately, the Git snapshot tarball feature was dropped when >>> sw

Re: [www.k.o] Let tar.xz be the default tarball on the main-page?

2013-03-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On 04/03/13 07:58 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> it is still tar.bz2 the default tarball for downloading. >> As modern Linux-kernel versions exists also as tar.xz which is smaller >> and causes l

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > I still did not get the original posting... > > This version hangs... I started in rescue-mode and see that udev, > premount and init scripts are run. ... udevd /scripts/init-premount ... done /scripts/pre

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I still did not get the original posting... >> >> This version hangs... I started in rescue-mode and see that udev, >> premount

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Sedat, > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:56:46 +0200 Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> This version hangs... I started in rescue-mode and see that udev, >> premount and init scripts are run. >> Currently, I have no glue

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 02:47:39 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Changes since 20130408: >> > >>

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Sedat, > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:56:46 +0200 Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> This version hangs... I started in rescue-mode and see that udev, >> premount and init scripts are run. >> Currently, I have no glue

Re: kdb: kgdb: CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA setting?

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Jason Wessel wrote: > On 04/09/2013 08:06 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> config DEBUG_RODATA >> bool "Write protect kernel read-only data structures" >> - default y >> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL >&

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Sedat, > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:11:50 +0200 Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> [ CC Al Viro ] > > You forgot to do that ... > >> Is there a "magic" git-command to revert all commit

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 9 April 2013 19:34, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> I have seen it on reboots. >> How to online/offline from sysfs? > > offline a cpu "x" with: > > echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online > > and on

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi Sedat, >> >> On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:11:50 +0200 Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> >>> [ CC Al Viro ] >> >> You forgot to do that .

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi Sedat, >>> >>> On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:11:50 +0200 Sedat Dilek wrote: >>

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 9 April 2013 19:34, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> I have seen it on reboots. >> How to online/offline from sysfs? > > offline a cpu "x" with: > > echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online > > and on

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 9 April 2013 21:38, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> With x=3 the system gets in an unuseable state. >> >> root# echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online >> >> I could not write my reply and had to do a

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [ BROKEN vfs-next: fs/pipe.c ]

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130408: > > The vfs tree still had its build failure so I used the version from > next-20130405. > With the attached patch including a follow-up I was able to boot today's Linux-Next. I have reverted "Revert "

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Viresh Kumar >>> wrote: >>>> On 9 April 2013 21:38, Sedat

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 9 April 2013 21:38, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> With x=3 the system gets in an unuseable state. >> >> root# echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online >> >> I could not write my reply and had to do a

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 9 April 2013 21:38, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> With x=3 the system gets in an unuseable state. >>> >>> root# echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/c

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]

2013-04-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> On 9 April 2013 21:38, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> With x=3 the system gets in an unuseable state. >

Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: Build linux-tools package with 'make deb-pkg'

2013-04-10 Thread Sedat Dilek
[ CCing some involved maintainers and MLs ] Hi Joerg, what is the status of your proposal patch? Is this [1] the last version you posted? What's with the integration into linux-kbuild? Background of my asking is that I need to build cpufreq-info shipped with the kernel-sources in tools-dir to t

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 10

2013-04-10 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130409: > > The vfs tree lost its build failure. > Beyond build-failures in vfs-next [0] and [1], it was not bootable (see [2] till [4])! This is now all fixed, thanks to all involved people! $ cat /proc/ver

Re: hangs on boot in 9984d7394618df9

2013-04-10 Thread Sedat Dilek
The issue is fixed with Linux-Next (next-20130410). - Sedat - [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=136559043516192&w=2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/ma

Re: mmotm 2013-04-25-16-24 uploaded

2013-05-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:27 AM, wrote: >> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2013-04-25-16-24 has been uploaded to >> >>http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/ >> > > Hi Andrew, > > Nice to see that IPC-SEM

Re: [PATCH -mm] ipc,sem: fix locking in semctl_main

2013-04-23 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 12:29 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: >> Andrew, here is the patch I promised :) >> >> Everywhere else in the code, we check sma->sem_perm.deleted under >> the semaphore array lock, so we should do teh same here. >> The eas

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 24 [ PM: Device 1-1.2 failed to resume async: error -32 ]

2013-04-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> There will be no linux-next release tomorrow (April 25). >> >> Changes since 20130423: >> >> The net-next tre

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 24 [ PM: Device 1-1.2 failed to resume async: error -32 ]

2013-04-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> > [ CC linux-pm and linux-usb (ehci) folks ] >> > >> > This happens with my external USB mouse after suspend/resume. >> > >> > Excerpt (full d

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 24 [ PM: Device 1-1.2 failed to resume async: error -32 ]

2013-04-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> > Did this work differently under earlier kernels? >> > >> >> Unfortunately, s/r did not work for several Linux-Next releases as >> there is missing tglx

Re: [PATCH -next] ipc: make refcounter atomic (was Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 23 [ Call-Traces: lib/debugobjects.c | kernel/rcupdate.c | kernel/rcutree.c ])

2013-04-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
ded. > > Now all callers return -EIDRM upon failure and abort the current operation. > Two exceptions are > in semaphore code where sem_getref_and_unlock() and sem_getref() trigger a > warning but proceed > to freeing up any held locks. > > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso

Re: [PATCH -next] ipc: make refcounter atomic (was Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 23 [ Call-Traces: lib/debugobjects.c | kernel/rcupdate.c | kernel/rcutree.c ])

2013-04-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 01:05 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Davidlohr Bueso >> wrote: >> > From: Davidlohr Bueso >> > >> > Sedat reported an issue lea

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 24 [ PM: Device 1-1.2 failed to resume async: error -32 ]

2013-04-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> With CONFIG_USB_DEBUG=y I do not see a PM/async line. >> >> Might you have a look at the logs? > > They look quite normal. Except for one thing: The built-in hubs

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 24 [ PM: Device 1-1.2 failed to resume async: error -32 ]

2013-04-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> [ Run logging on USB-bus #1 ] >> >> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/usb/usbmon/1u > /tmp/usbmon-1u.txt <--- USB-bus #01 >> >> [ Do suspend plus resume ] >&

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26

2013-04-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130424: > > Removed tree: ppc-temp (remerged into powerpc) > > The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net and pci trees and a > build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch. > > The omap_dss2 tr

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26

2013-04-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130424: >> >> Removed tree: ppc-temp (remerged into powerpc) >> >> The net-next tree gained confli

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26

2013-04-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Michal Marek wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:58:25AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: >>> Can you send a copy of your .config? >> >> I can reproduce it as well: &

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26

2013-04-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Michal Marek wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:58:25AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: >>>> Can you send a copy

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26

2013-04-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Michal Marek wrote: > On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote: >> On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to build again. >>> >>> Revert "kconfig: imp

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26

2013-04-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Michal Marek wrote: >> On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote: >>> On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to build again. &

Re: mmotm 2013-04-25-16-24 uploaded

2013-04-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
me approx 2 weeks and XX kernel-builds. Please gimme appropriate credits, Thanks. Have a nice weekend, - Sedat - P.S.: Check for Sedat's credits. ipcsem-fine-grained-locking-for-semtimedop-fix-lockdep-false-positive.patch:Cc: Sedat Dilek ipcsem-fine-grained-locking-for-semtimedop-ip

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26 [ bluetooth on suspend/resume ]

2013-04-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130424: > > Removed tree: ppc-temp (remerged into powerpc) > > The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net and pci trees and a > build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch. > > The omap_dss2 tr

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26 [ bluetooth on suspend/resume ]

2013-04-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20130424: >>> >>> Removed tree

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26 [ bluetooth on suspend/resume ]

2013-04-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > 2013/4/26 Sedat Dilek : >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 07:40:20PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> Oops, NULL-pointer-deref [ __queue_work() ] >>&

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26 [ bluetooth on suspend/resume ]

2013-04-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 07:40:20PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Oops, NULL-pointer-deref [ __queue_work() ] >> >> [ 25.974932] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference >> at 0100 >> [

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26 [ bluetooth on suspend/resume ]

2013-04-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:07:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > The second argument %rsi is zero, which got transferred to %r13 and >> > then offset deref on it trapped. >> > >> > The second argumen

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26

2013-04-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Michal Marek wrote: > Dne 27.4.2013 00:01, Yann E. MORIN napsal(a): >> Michal, Sedat, All, >> >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:13:33PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: >>> On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote: >>>> On 26.4

[PATCH usb-next] USB: Improve documentation for usbmon

2013-04-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
This is a give-back to USB folks who helped me in a USB debug issue. Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- Documentation/usb/usbmon.txt | 87 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/usb/usbmon.txt b/Documentation/usb

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 26

2013-04-29 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> P.S. Geert, please trim your replies. > > Sorry, I noticed only after sending. > (First time I wanted to reply without quoting anything using the new gmail > web interface.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 11 [ crypto: aesni-intel ]

2013-04-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130410: >> >> The tip tree gained conflicts against the net-next and pm trees. >> >> The driver-

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]

2013-04-12 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 10 April 2013 11:44, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> I found this "[RFC PATCH] kbuild: Build linux-tools package with 'make >> deb-pkg'" from February 2012. >> Can't say what happened to it... >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 11 [ crypto: aesni-intel ]

2013-04-12 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:14:31PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Changes since 20130410: >> > >> &g

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]

2013-04-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, April 12, 2013 11:08:37 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:24

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]

2013-04-15 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Dirk Brandewie wrote: > On 04/13/2013 02:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> >>> On Friday, April 12, 2013 11:08:37 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> >>>>

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]

2013-04-15 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 15 April 2013 21:37, Dirk Brandewie wrote: >>> If the intel_pstate driver is being used __cpufreq_governor() should NOT be >>> called intel_pstate do

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]

2013-04-15 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Viresh Kumar >> wrote: >>> On 15 April 2013 21:37, Dirk Brandewie wrote: >>>> If the intel_pstate driver is being

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (drm-intel tree related)

2013-03-12 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig) >> failed like this: >> >> drivers/built-in.o: In function `i915_min_freq_set': >> i915_debugfs.

Re: Service not available!

2012-08-06 Thread Sedat Dilek
ference on linux-next ML to [1] otherwise I would not have known. - Sedat - [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1220151/ > - John 'Warthog9' Hawley > Chief Kernel.org Administrator > > On 05/05/2012 02:40 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> why is patc

Re: Service not available!

2012-08-06 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On 06/08/12 01:16 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> it would be wonderful to get a feedback when services are available again. >> >> I just saw today a reference on linux-next ML to [1] otherwise I would >> no

[PATCH] PM / Freezer: Fix small typo "regrigerator"

2012-08-21 Thread Sedat Dilek
Noticed when digging into a suspend issue in linux-next (next-20120821). For more details see <http://marc.info/?t=13455470802&r=1&w=2>. Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- kernel/power/process.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/pow

Re: [next-20120823] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 200 on s/r

2012-08-23 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:46:37PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > this week I was seeing the below NOHZ messages in my logs es

[PATCH drm-next] drm: udl: usb: Fix recursive Kconfig dependency

2012-08-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
ected by DRM_USB drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:22: symbol DRM_USB is selected by DRM_UDL Fix the issue by dropping "select USB_SUPPORT" from "config DRM_USB". Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig |1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/dri

[PATCH drm-next v2] drm: udl: usb: Fix recursive Kconfig dependency

2012-08-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
estore old status, but change from select to depends on USB_SUPPORT ] Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig |3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig index 3a8c683..0cbdc45 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/d

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree

2012-08-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi Dave, >>> >>> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_modes.c between commit 4eab8136

[PATCH drm-next 1/3] drm/udl: usb: Fix recursive Kconfig dependency

2012-08-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
estore old status, but change from select to depends on USB_SUPPORT ] [ v3: Use common prefix "drm/udl" in label ] Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig |3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig

[PATCH drm-next 2/3] drm/i915: Remove reference to drm_display_info raw_edid field

2012-08-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
Reported-By: Stephen Rothwell Acked-by: Jani Nikula Acked-by: Dave Airlie Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_modes.c |1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_modes.c index 29b7259..4bc1c0f

[PATCH drm-next 3/3] drm/i915/contexts: Fixup merge with commit b6c7488df68a

2012-08-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
This is a fixup patch for the merge of drm-next into linux-next caused by commit b6c7488df68a ("drm/i915/contexts: fix list corruption"). Reported-By: Stephen Rothwell Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

Re: [PATCH drm-next 3/3] drm/i915/contexts: Fixup merge with commit b6c7488df68a

2012-08-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:16:24AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> This is a fixup patch for the merge of drm-next into linux-next caused >> by commit b6c7488df68a ("drm/i915/contexts: fix list corruption"). >> &

Re: [PATCH drm-next 2/3] drm/i915: Remove reference to drm_display_info raw_edid field

2012-08-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:16:23AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Reported-By: Stephen Rothwell >> Acked-by: Jani Nikula >> Acked-by: Dave Airlie >> Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek > > This doesn't ap

[PATCH] drm/i915: Remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD

2012-08-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
x-next (next-20120824). Fix this by removing __GFP_NO_KSWAPD from drm/i915 driver. Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cgroup tree

2012-09-15 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 08:32:28PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Did you pushed this to [1] already? > > Was still building. Pushed out now. > Pulled and works fine here! Thanks to you. - Sedat - P.S.: dmesg checks $ dme

Re: Using vanilla kernels headers to do backport testing -- issues with memcpy()

2012-08-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Ozan Çağlayan wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez >> wrote: > >>> mcgrof@garbanzo ~/compat (git::master)$ objdump -T >>> /home/mcgrof/compat-ksrc/lib/modules/3.4.4-030404-generic/

Re: Using vanilla kernels headers to do backport testing -- issues with memcpy()

2012-08-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> I am not an English native but this sentence sounds a bit strange to >> me ("used" followed by "require" and double "Linux"?). >>

Re: Backports mailing list

2012-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > David, > > The compat [0] / compat-wireless [1] [2] projects have received quite > a bit of love of the years to the point we now have 3 subsystems > backported: Ethernet, Bluetooth and 802.11. Ozan Çağlayan, a Linux > Foundation Google

Re: [PATCH 00/13] overlay filesystem: request for inclusion (v14)

2012-08-15 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Here's the latest version of the overlayfs series. > > Git tree is here: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git overlayfs.v14 > > Please consider for 3.7. > [ Stephen (linux-next) maintainer ] Wouldn't it be a

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >