e device names of both PMUs are different.
>
OK, that works then.
You want to do a full-length comparison of PMU names, instead of comparing
prefixes.
Reviewed-by: Sebastien Boisvert
Carvalho de Melo
Cc: "Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)"
Cc: Namhyung Kim
Cc: Ross Zwisler
Cc: Elenie Godzaridis
Cc: linux-perf-us...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boisvert
---
include/linux/pfn_t.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 de
On 2019-02-24 10:37 a.m., Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen
>
> Upcoming changes add timestamp output in perf report. Add a --ns
> argument similar to perf script to support nanoseconds resolution
> when needed.
Is this a ISO-8601 date with nanoseconds ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen
>
On 2019-05-22 6:17 a.m., Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> Rename nr_activate{0,1} into nr_activate{anon,file} since this
Rename nr_activate{0,1} into nr_activate{anon,file}
^
add an underscore here
(nr_activate_anon, nr_acti
4 matches
Mail list logo