Re: Linux 2.4.3-ac5

2001-04-13 Thread Scott Prader
* Alan Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) uttered: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/ one of the problems i've been having so far with the 2.4.3 series is the fact that USB appears to be futzed. It just doesn't want to work right. Also, I compile a lot of things as modules an

Re: ANNOUNCE New Open Source X server

2001-04-18 Thread Scott Prader
* Miles Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) uttered: > Take a chill pill, dude. i am quite calm. :) > Dave's questions are perfectly valid. Obviously, if a bunch of > kick-butt programmers want to go off a create a "from-scratch" > X11 implementation, please go right ahead! If it turns out to > be gre

Re: ANNOUNCE New Open Source X server

2001-04-18 Thread Scott Prader
* Alan Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) uttered: > the ideas behind it. Some of them have been at it since Linus was a small > child. The TinyX server framework also lets you hack arbitarily interesting > card drivers into a nice easy framework. you will NOT see my complaining about any of that. :) btw

Re: ANNOUNCE New Open Source X server

2001-04-18 Thread Scott Prader
* David S. Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) uttered: > > James Simmons writes: > > The Linux GFX project grew out the need for a higher performance X > > And this specific functionality is? > > I think this is not a worthwhile project at all. The X tree, it's > assosciated protocols and APIs, a