Re: [PATCH] ARM: hw_breakpoint: Enable debug powerdown only if system supports 'has_ossr'

2013-03-17 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Friday 15 March 2013 10:30 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 01:08:00PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> Will, > > Hi guys, > > I'm out of the office at the moment and have really terrible connectivity, > so I can't do too much until next w

Re: [PATCH] ARM: hw_breakpoint: Enable debug powerdown only if system supports 'has_ossr'

2013-03-18 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 18 March 2013 08:37 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Santosh, > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:51:30AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Friday 15 March 2013 10:30 AM, Will Deacon wrote: >>> Furthermore, I was under the impression that hw_breakpoint did actually

Re: [PATCH] ARM: hw_breakpoint: Enable debug powerdown only if system supports 'has_ossr'

2013-03-18 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 18 March 2013 10:36 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 03:46:28PM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Monday 18 March 2013 08:37 PM, Will Deacon wrote: >>> That really sucks :( Does this affect all OMAP-based boards? >>> >> All OMAP4

Re: [PATCH 0/2] omap serial fix.

2013-03-18 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
_suspend" in the > bootargs. > > These patches are developed on 3.8 custom kernel containing omap5 > supend/resume support. > > Cc: Santosh Shilimkar Thanks Sourav for sorting out the issue. With update of changelog suggested by Kevin on patch 1, Feel free to add, Acked-

Re: [PATCH 03/10] gpio: gpio-omap.c: fix checkpatch error

2013-03-20 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Wednesday 20 March 2013 05:45 PM, Laurent Navet wrote: > Fix : > gpio/gpio-omap.c:697: ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '(' > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Navet > --- Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un

Re: [PATCH 03/10] gpio: gpio-omap.c: fix checkpatch error

2013-03-20 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Wednesday 20 March 2013 05:54 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Wednesday 20 March 2013 05:45 PM, Laurent Navet wrote: >> Fix : >> gpio/gpio-omap.c:697: ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '(' >> >> Signed-off-by: Laurent Navet >>

Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] add omap mcspi device tree data

2013-02-04 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-evm.dts | 46 +++ arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi| 40 + 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs

Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] ARM: vmregion: remove vmregion code entirely

2013-02-05 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Tuesday 05 February 2013 06:01 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: Now, there is no user for vmregion. So remove it. Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Makefile b/arch/arm/mm/Makefile index 8a9c4cb..4e333fa 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/mm/Mak

Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] introduce static_vm for ARM-specific static mapped area

2013-02-05 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
100644 arch/arm/mm/vmregion.c delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mm/vmregion.h Nice Clean-up. I tested this series on OMAP which uses few static mappings. Feel free to add, Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of

Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] ARM: dts: omap5: add dwc3 omap dt data

2013-02-05 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Tuesday 05 February 2013 02:16 PM, kishon wrote: Hi, On Tuesday 05 February 2013 02:08 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 01:59:26PM +0530, kishon wrote: On Sunday 27 January 2013 01:17 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: Hello. On 25-01-2013 15:11, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Add

Re: [PATCHv3 4/4] arm: Add generic timer broadcast support

2013-02-07 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
Mark, On Thursday 07 February 2013 03:34 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: Hi Stephen, Sorry about this; I'm to blame for the bug. On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:51:43PM +, Stephen Warren wrote: On 01/14/2013 10:05 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: Implement timer_broadcast for the arm architecture, allowing fo

Re: [PATCHv3 4/4] arm: Add generic timer broadcast support

2013-02-07 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Thursday 07 February 2013 10:21 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 02/07/2013 04:40 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: [...] Stephan, Do we have crash log seen on Tegra ? Which tegra CPUIDLE driver is being used when crash is seen ? The crash log is below. It's simply because td->evt->b

Re: [PATCHv3 4/4] arm: Add generic timer broadcast support

2013-02-07 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
Mark, On Thursday 07 February 2013 10:47 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: [..] I believe the patch below will fix this for Tegra and any other platforms where broadcast is required in low power states. From the Stephan's crash the issue is pretty clear and your patch make sense. Some how I didn't man

Re: [RFC v2] dmaengine: omap-dma: Start DMA without delay for cyclic channels

2013-04-03 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Wednesday 03 April 2013 04:47 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > cyclic DMA is only used by audio which needs DMA to be started without a > delay. > If the DMA for audio is started using the tasklet we experience random > channel switch (to be more precise: channel shift). > > Reported-by: Peter Meerw

Re: [RFC v2] dmaengine: omap-dma: Start DMA without delay for cyclic channels

2013-04-03 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Wednesday 03 April 2013 05:22 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > On 04/03/2013 01:24 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Wednesday 03 April 2013 04:47 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >>> cyclic DMA is only used by audio which needs DMA to be started without a >>> delay. >>

Re: [PATCH/Resend 2/2] arm: mach-omap2: prevent UART console idle on suspend while using "no_console_suspend"

2013-04-05 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
>>>>>> used, od->flags >>>>>>> should be ORed with "OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND", thereby not >>>>>>> allowing the console >>>>>>> to idle in the suspend path. For non-dt case, this was taken care >>>>

Re: One of these things (CONFIG_HZ) is not like the others..

2013-01-28 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
Jon, On Tuesday 29 January 2013 05:31 AM, John Stultz wrote: On 01/27/2013 10:08 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: On Tuesday 22 January 2013 08:35 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: On Tuesday 22 January 2013 08:21 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 03:44:03PM +0530, Santosh

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ARM: kernel: update cpuinfo to print CPU model name

2013-01-29 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Wednesday 30 January 2013 04:42 AM, Ruslan Bilovol wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 05:54:24PM +0200, Ruslan Bilovol wrote: CPU implementer : 0x41 CPU name: OMAP4470 ES1.0 HS Sigh. No. Look at what you're doing

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: update cpuinfo to print SoC model name

2013-01-29 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Wednesday 30 January 2013 06:08 AM, Ruslan Bilovol wrote: The following patches update cpuinfo to print SoC model name for ARM. The first patch exactly makes needed changes for ARM architecture and adds a common approach to show SoC name. Second patch uses this approach for OMAP4 SoCs (as live

Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: omap4-sdp: Add I2c pinctrl data

2013-01-30 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
dts file is not adapted to use i2c through pinctrl framework. Populating i2c pinctrl data to get rid of the error. Tested on omap4430 sdp with 3.8-rc4 kernel. Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar Reported-by: Santosh Shilimkar --- Could you do the same thing for panda? I'm getting the same ki

Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared_type

2013-01-31 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
ore http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5737 Many non-ACPI systems are filling this field by mistake, which makes its usage confusing. Lets clean it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Cc: Linus Walleij Cc: Stephen Warren Cc: Shawn Guo Cc: Santosh Shilimkar --- I haven't looked at the

Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared_type

2013-01-31 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Friday 01 February 2013 12:43 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 1 February 2013 12:17, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: I haven't looked at the cpufreq code recently but remember that it was needed to ensure that all the CPU which share clock/voltage gets updated (affected cpus) on freq change. The

Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared_type

2013-02-01 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Friday 01 February 2013 01:32 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 1 February 2013 13:03, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: I am not talking about just notifiers. This is for external users who has subscribed for notifiers. The point is whether the core CPUFReq gets updated without that flag for all affected

Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared_type

2013-02-01 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
Viresh, On Friday 01 February 2013 02:22 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: On Friday 01 February 2013 01:32 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 1 February 2013 13:03, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: I am not talking about just notifiers. This is for external users who has subscribed for notifiers. The point is

Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: omap_hsmmc: convert to dma_request_slave_channel_compat()

2013-02-01 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Saturday 02 February 2013 02:31 AM, Matt Porter wrote: Convert dmaengine channel requests to use dma_request_slave_channel_compat(). This supports platforms booting with or without DT populated. Signed-off-by: Matt Porter Acked-by: Tony Lindgren --- Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar -- To

Re: [PATCH 3/3] mmc: omap_hsmmc: add generic DMA request support to the DT binding

2013-02-01 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Saturday 02 February 2013 02:31 AM, Matt Porter wrote: The binding definition is based on the generic DMA request binding. Signed-off-by: Matt Porter Acked-by: Tony Lindgren --- Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel&qu

Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] DMA Engine support for AM33XX

2013-01-24 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Friday 25 January 2013 02:19 AM, Matt Porter wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:12:05AM +, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: On Thursday 24 January 2013 02:19 AM, Matt Porter wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:37:55PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: Matt, On Wednesday 16 January 2013 02:02 AM

Re: One of these things (CONFIG_HZ) is not like the others..

2013-01-27 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Tuesday 22 January 2013 08:35 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: On Tuesday 22 January 2013 08:21 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 03:44:03PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: Sorry for not being clear enough. On OMAP, 32KHz is the only clock which is always running(even

Re: too many timer retries happen when do local timer swtich with broadcast timer

2013-02-24 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Saturday 23 February 2013 12:22 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:03:02PM +, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:07:30PM +, Thomas Gleixner wrote: Now we co

Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: timer-sp: Set dynamic irq affinity

2013-02-26 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Wednesday 27 February 2013 03:47 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: From: Viresh Kumar When a cpu goes to a deep idle state where its local timer is shutdown, it notifies the time frame work to use the broadcast timer instead. Unfortunately, the broadcast device could wake up any CPU, including an i

Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: timer-sp: Set dynamic irq affinity

2013-02-26 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Wednesday 27 February 2013 10:29 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 27 February 2013 10:26, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: On Wednesday 27 February 2013 03:47 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: From: Viresh Kumar When a cpu goes to a deep idle state where its local timer is shutdown, it notifies the time

Re: [PATCH 1/4] time : pass broadcast parameter

2013-02-26 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Wednesday 27 February 2013 03:47 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: The broadcast timer could be passed as parameter to the function instead of using again tick_broadcast_device.evtdev which was previously used in the caller function. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- The change doesn't buy us as su

Re: [PATCH 2/4] time : set broadcast irq affinity

2013-02-26 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Wednesday 27 February 2013 03:47 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: When a cpu goes to a deep idle state where its local timer is shutdown, it notifies the time frame work to use the broadcast timer instead. Unfortunately, the broadcast device could wake up any CPU, including an idle one which is not

Re: [PATCH 0/4] time: dynamic irq affinity

2013-02-26 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Wednesday 27 February 2013 03:47 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: When a cpu goes to a deep idle state where its local timer is shutdown, it notifies the time framework to use the broadcast timer instead. Unfortunately, the broadcast device could wake up any CPU, including an idle one which is not c

Re: [PATCH, RFC 0/8] ARM: AM43 (OMAP2+) boot support

2013-02-19 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 18 February 2013 05:05 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote: (Resending, since it seems, LAKML doesn't accept patches with subject prefix only as "RFC", but requires "PATCH" prefix also) Hi, This series adds minimal support to boot Linux on platforms having AM43 based SoC's. This is being sent a

Re: [PATCH, RFC 2/8] ARM: twd: register clock event for 1 core SMP

2013-02-19 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 18 February 2013 05:07 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote: Register percpu local timer for scheduler tick in the case of one core SMP configuration. In other cases - secondary cpu's as well as boot cpu's having more than one core, this is being registered as per existing boot flow, with a differe

Re: [PATCH, RFC 3/8] ARM: twd: clock rate from DT (if no DT clk tree)

2013-02-19 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 18 February 2013 05:07 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote: Add an optional property to find clock-frequency from DT. This helps as a fallback mechanism in case there is no representation of clock tree in DT. Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed --- This won't work always because twd clock is CPU depe

Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/8] ARM: localtimer: return percpu clkevt on register

2013-02-19 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 18 February 2013 05:06 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote: Return percpu clock event on local timer register. It is the boot cpu that calls this and it can use the returned percpu clock event to register a clock event in the case of SMP configuration with one core. SMP configuration with 1 core

Re: [PATCH, RFC 4/8] ARM: am33xx: ll debug config help

2013-02-19 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 18 February 2013 05:07 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote: Selecting DEBUG_AM33XXUART1 routes low level debug messages to first UART instance of AM335x based SoC's. This selection is valid for upcoming AM43 based SoC's too. Make this information available upon configuring. Signed-off-by: Afzal M

Re: [PATCH, RFC 5/8] ARM: OMAP2+: am43: Kconfig

2013-02-19 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 18 February 2013 05:08 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote: Add Kconfig option for AM43 family of SoC's, these are ARM Cortex A9 based (SMP configuration with 1 core). Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git

Re: [PATCH, RFC 6/8] ARM: OMAP2+: am43: basic dt support

2013-02-19 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 18 February 2013 05:08 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote: Describe minimal DT boot machine details for AM43 based SoC's. AM43 family of SoC's are ARM Cortex-A9 based with one core in SMP configuration. Low level debug could be achieved by selecting DEBUG_AM33XXUART1. To boot AM43 SoC, this chang

Re: [PATCH, RFC 8/8] ARM: dts: am43-pre-silicon support

2013-02-19 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 18 February 2013 05:08 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote: AM43 SoC is in pre-silicon stage, meanwhile it has been modelled in a pre-silicon platform. To validate and boot Linux in pre-silicon platform that emulates an AM43 SoC, add DT build support. As bootloader is not used, bootargs is passed

Re: [PATCH, RFC 8/8] ARM: dts: am43-pre-silicon support

2013-02-19 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Tuesday 19 February 2013 04:22 PM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: Hi Santosh, On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 16:05:22, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: On Monday 18 February 2013 05:08 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote: AM43 SoC is in pre-silicon stage, meanwhile it has been modelled in a pre-silicon platform. To valid

Re: [PATCH, RFC 5/8] ARM: OMAP2+: am43: Kconfig

2013-02-19 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Tuesday 19 February 2013 04:26 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 03:57:07PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: On Monday 18 February 2013 05:08 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote: Add Kconfig option for AM43 family of SoC's, these are ARM Cortex A9 based (SMP configuration with 1

Re: [PATCH, RFC 4/8] ARM: am33xx: ll debug config help

2013-02-19 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Tuesday 19 February 2013 04:00 PM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: Hi Santosh, On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 15:55:59, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: With DT, IIRC DEBUGLL is broken. So did you hack debug-macro.S to get the earlyprintk working ? No, on linux-next, ll debug works properly. Indeed. Tony fixe

Re: [PATCH, RFC 8/8] ARM: dts: am43-pre-silicon support

2013-02-19 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Tuesday 19 February 2013 04:33 PM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: Hi Santosh, On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 16:30:13, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: On Tuesday 19 February 2013 04:22 PM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: SoC support is already added in patch 7/8. This is board (which doesn't exist now) support, hence

Re: [PATCH, RFC 2/8] ARM: twd: register clock event for 1 core SMP

2013-02-19 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Tuesday 19 February 2013 05:44 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 03:44:14PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: On Monday 18 February 2013 05:07 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote: Register percpu local timer for scheduler tick in the case of one core SMP configuration. In other cases

Re: [resend] Timer broadcast question

2013-02-20 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
ctiveness of such optimization solely depends on how well the affinity (in low powers) supported by your IRQ chip. Hope this is helpful for you. Regards, Santosh From d70f2d48ec08a3f1d73187c49b16e4e60f81a50c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Santosh Shilimkar Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 03:42:33 +0530 S

Re: [resend] Timer broadcast question

2013-02-21 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Thursday 21 February 2013 02:31 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 02/21/2013 07:19 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: On Tuesday 19 February 2013 11:51 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 02/19/2013 07:10 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Daniel Lezcano wrote: I am working on identifying the

Re: too many timer retries happen when do local timer swtich with broadcast timer

2013-02-21 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
one. Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar Thanks for the patch. And thanks to Jason for spotting the issue. Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.

Re: too many timer retries happen when do local timer swtich with broadcast timer

2013-02-22 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
Thomas, On Friday 22 February 2013 03:49 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: On Thursday 21 February 2013 07:18 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: find below a completely untested patch, which should address that issue. After looking at the thread, I tried to

Re: too many timer retries happen when do local timer swtich with broadcast timer

2013-02-22 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Friday 22 February 2013 03:54 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: BTW, Lorenzo off-list mentioned to me about warning in boot-up which I missed while testing your patch. It will take bit more time for me to look into it and hence thought of reporting it

Re: too many timer retries happen when do local timer swtich with broadcast timer

2013-02-22 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Friday 22 February 2013 04:01 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:24:00AM +, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: BTW, Lorenzo off-list mentioned to me about warning in boot-up which I missed while testing your patch. It will take bit

Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: provide compatibility string for DT matchup

2013-03-12 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Tuesday 12 March 2013 07:58 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: > On 03/12/2013 06:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Tuesday 12 March 2013 04:35 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> commit 5553f9e (cpufreq: instantiate cpufreq-cpu0 as a platform_driver) >>> now forces platform

Re: [patch 0/7] tick: Optimize broadcast handling and prevent expiry ping pong

2013-03-13 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
t; I have tested this revised patches on OMAP4 and OMAP5 platforms with CPUidle enabled against 3.9-rc2. As expected they seems to work without any issue and also fixes the reported retry issue. Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu

Re: [PATCH] ARM: hw_breakpoint: Enable debug powerdown only if system supports 'has_ossr'

2013-03-14 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
ere OSSR is mandatory. >> Sorry about this and thanks for catching this. > Thanks for confirming..:) > Can you please queue this one for 3.9-rc2+ ? Without this patch CPUIDLE is unusable on OMAP4 devices because of those flood of warning messages. I was also wondering whether we should ju

[PATCH 1/1] drivers: bus: Move the OMAP interconnect driver to drivers/bus/

2012-09-14 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
OMAP interconnect drivers are used for the interconnect error handling. Since they are bus driver, lets move it to newly created drivers/bus. Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Tony Lindgren Tested-by: Lokesh Vutla Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar --- Patch just moves OMAP interconnect drivers as is to

Re: [PATCH] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries

2012-10-04 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
IMERS select ARM_CPU_SUSPEND if PM select SOC_HAS_REALTIME_COUNTER select ARM_ARCH_TIMER Drop this change. With that fixed, for OMAP changes Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a me

Re: [PATCH] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries

2012-10-04 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Friday 05 October 2012 06:42 AM, Simon Horman wrote: On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 02:41:46PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: On Thursday 04 October 2012 02:20 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: The TWD and SCU configs are selected by default as long as SCORPIONMP is false and/or MCT is false. Implementing

Re: [RFC 2/6] sched: add a new SD SHARE_POWERLINE flag for sched_domain

2012-10-24 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
Vincent, Few comments/questions. On Sunday 07 October 2012 01:13 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: This new flag SD SHARE_POWERLINE reflects the sharing of the power rail between the members of a domain. As this is the current assumption of the scheduler, the flag is added to all sched_domain Signed-

Re: [RFC 3/6] sched: pack small tasks

2012-10-24 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
Vincent, Few comments/questions. On Sunday 07 October 2012 01:13 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: During sched_domain creation, we define a pack buddy CPU if available. On a system that share the powerline at all level, the buddy is set to -1 On a dual clusters / dual cores system which can powerga

Re: [RFC 4/6] sched: secure access to other CPU statistics

2012-10-24 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
$subject is bit confusing here. On Sunday 07 October 2012 01:13 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: The atomic update of runnable_avg_sum and runnable_avg_period are ensured by their size and the toolchain. But we must ensure to not read an old value for one field and a newly updated value for the other

Re: [RFC 5/6] sched: pack the idle load balance

2012-10-24 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Sunday 07 October 2012 01:13 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: Look for an idle CPU close the pack buddy CPU whenever possible. s/close/close to The goal is to prevent the wake up of a CPU which doesn't share the power line of the pack CPU Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot --- kernel/sched/fair.c

Re: [RFC 6/6] ARM: sched: clear SD_SHARE_POWERLINE

2012-10-24 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Sunday 07 October 2012 01:13 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: The ARM platforms take advantage of packing small tasks on few cores. This is true even when the cores of a cluster can't be powergated independently. Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot --- arch/arm/kernel/topology.c |5 + 1 file

Re: [PATCH RFT] ARM64: dma-mapping: support debug_dma_mapping_error

2012-10-26 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Friday 26 October 2012 04:17 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: Add support for debug_dma_mapping_error() call to avoid warning from debug_dma_unmap() interface when it checks for mapping error checked status. Without this patch, device driver failed to check map error warning is generated. Signed-off-by:

Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: ID: Improve features detection and check

2012-11-01 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Thursday 01 November 2012 03:53 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: Replaces several flags bearing the same meaning. There is no need to set flags due to different omap types here, it can be checked in appropriate places as well. Cc: Tony Lindgren Cc: Russell King Cc: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org Cc:

Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: ID: Improve features detection and check

2012-11-01 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Thursday 01 November 2012 09:50 PM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote: On 11/01/2012 01:35 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: On Thursday 01 November 2012 03:53 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: Replaces several flags bearing the same meaning. There is no need to set flags due to different omap types here, it can

Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: ID: Improve features detection and check

2012-11-01 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Thursday 01 November 2012 10:36 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: On 22:05-20121101, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: On Thursday 01 November 2012 09:50 PM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote: On 11/01/2012 01:35 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: On Thursday 01 November 2012 03:53 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: Replaces

Re: [RFC 2/6] sched: add a new SD SHARE_POWERLINE flag for sched_domain

2012-11-02 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 29 October 2012 03:20 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: It looks like i need to describe more what On 29 October 2012 10:40, Vincent Guittot wrote: On 24 October 2012 17:17, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: Vincent, Few comments/questions. On Sunday 07 October 2012 01:13 PM, Vincent Guittot

Re: [RFC 3/6] sched: pack small tasks

2012-11-02 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 29 October 2012 06:42 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: On 24 October 2012 17:20, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: Vincent, Few comments/questions. On Sunday 07 October 2012 01:13 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: During sched_domain creation, we define a pack buddy CPU if available. On a system

Re: [RFC 5/6] sched: pack the idle load balance

2012-11-02 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 29 October 2012 06:57 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: On 24 October 2012 17:21, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: On Sunday 07 October 2012 01:13 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: Look for an idle CPU close the pack buddy CPU whenever possible. s/close/close to yes The goal is to prevent the

Re: [RFC 6/6] ARM: sched: clear SD_SHARE_POWERLINE

2012-11-02 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 29 October 2012 06:58 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: On 24 October 2012 17:21, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: On Sunday 07 October 2012 01:13 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: The ARM platforms take advantage of packing small tasks on few cores. This is true even when the cores of a cluster can&#

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: Basic default configuration for Pandaboard

2012-10-27 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Saturday 27 October 2012 05:33 PM, Constantine Shulyupin wrote: From: Constantine Shulyupin Tested SD (MMC) and Ethernet smsc95xx on linux-3.7-rc2 Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin -- kernel size is 2.3 MiB --- arch/arm/configs/omap4_panda_defconfig | 115

Re: [PATCH v3] gpio: interrupt consistency check for OF GPIO IRQs

2013-08-27 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Tuesday 27 August 2013 04:17 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/26/2013 08:07 AM, Lars Poeschel wrote: >> From: Linus Walleij >> >> Currently the kernel is ambigously treating GPIOs and interrupts >> from a GPIO controller: GPIOs and interrupts are treated as >> orthogonal. This unfortunately ma

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] DRIVERS: IRQCHIP: Add support for crossbar IP

2013-10-01 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Tuesday 01 October 2013 09:48 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On 10/01/2013 06:13 AM, Sricharan R wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Monday 30 September 2013 08:39 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On 09/30/2013 08:59 AM, Sricharan R wrote: Some socs have a large number of interrupts requests to service the nee

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] DRIVERS: IRQCHIP: Add support for crossbar IP

2013-10-01 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Tuesday 01 October 2013 10:53 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On 10/01/2013 08:57 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Tuesday 01 October 2013 09:48 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On 10/01/2013 06:13 AM, Sricharan R wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Monday 3

[PATCH] sched_clock: fix postinit no sched_clock function check

2013-10-02 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
Cc: Russell King Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Rob Herring Cc: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar --- kernel/time/sched_clock.c |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/sched_clock.c b/kernel/time/sched_clock.c index 0b479a6..15c4d78 100644 --- a

Re: [PATCH] sched_clock: fix postinit no sched_clock function check

2013-10-02 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Wednesday 02 October 2013 01:09 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 05:55:28PM +0100, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> The sched_clock code uses 2 levels of function pointers, sched_clock_func() >> and read_sched_clock() but the no sched_clock check in postinit()

Re: [PATCH] sched_clock: fix postinit no sched_clock function check

2013-10-02 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Wednesday 02 October 2013 01:22 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/02/13 10:14, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Wednesday 02 October 2013 01:09 PM, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 05:55:28PM +0100, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>>> The sched_clock code uses

Re: [PATCH] sched_clock: fix postinit no sched_clock function check

2013-10-02 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Wednesday 02 October 2013 01:48 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 06:42:40PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 10/02/13 10:27, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> Really... I have not created patch out of fun. >>> Its broken on my keystone machine at lea

Re: Use of drivers/platform and matching include?

2013-10-04 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Friday 04 October 2013 12:48 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:41:28PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>> >>> So, no, there will be no new drivers under arch/arm. They must be in the >>> drivers subtree

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Add secure function omap_smc3() which calling instruction smc #1

2013-07-11 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
.S > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S > >> index f6441c1..5c02b8d 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S > >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S > >> @@ -1,9 +1,11 @@ > >> /* > >> - * OMAP44xx secure APIs file. > >> + * O

[RFC/RFT PATCH 3/5] scsi: Use dma_max_pfn(dev) helper for bounce_limit calculations

2013-07-12 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
s expected to return the DMAable maximum pfn value across architectures. Cc: Russell King Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar --- drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/

[RFC/RFT PATCH 5/5] ARM: mm: Remove bootmem code and switch to NO_BOOTMEM

2013-07-12 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
ill won't work but this is one of the step to solve that problem for ARM. Cc: Russell King Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar --- arch/arm/Kconfig|1 + arch/arm/kernel/setup.c |2 +- arch/arm/mm/init.c

[RFC/RFT PATCH 2/5] mm: dma-mapping: Add dma_max_pfn(dev) helper function

2013-07-12 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
block PFN number. In all the generic cases, it is just "dev->dma_mask >> PAGE_SHIFT" and hence default behavior is maintained as is. Subsequent patches will make use of the helper. No functional change. Cc: Russell King Cc: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar ---

[RFC/RFT PATCH 0/5] mm: ARM nobootmem and few dma_mask fixes

2013-07-12 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
olas Pitre Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Jens Axboe Santosh Shilimkar (5): block: Rename parameter dma_mask to max_addr for blk_queue_bounce_limit() mm: dma-mapping: Add dma_max_pfn(dev) helper function scsi: Use dma_max_pfn(dev) helper for bounce_limit calculations ARM: mm: change max*pfn to i

[RFC/RFT PATCH 4/5] ARM: mm: change max*pfn to include the physical offset of memory

2013-07-12 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
. It is done this way just to enable testing since its understood that it can come in way of single zImage. Cc: Russell King Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Nicolas Pitre Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar --- arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 16 arch/arm/mm

[RFC/RFT PATCH 1/5] block: Rename parameter dma_mask to max_addr for blk_queue_bounce_limit()

2013-07-12 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
t could be miss-interpreted. Cc: Russell King Cc: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar --- block/blk-settings.c |8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c index c50ecf0..026c151 100644 --- a/block/blk-settin

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] DRIVERS: IRQCHIP: Add crossbar irqchip driver

2013-09-18 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
Thomas, On Friday 13 September 2013 10:55 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Friday 13 September 2013 10:24 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: [...] >> Before you dig into MSI, lets talk about irq domains first. >> >> GIC implements a legacy irq domain, i.e. a linear domain o

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] DRIVERS: IRQCHIP: Add crossbar irqchip driver

2013-09-12 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
Thomas, On Thursday 12 September 2013 04:18 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Sricharan R wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R >> --- >> There is lockdep warning during the boot. This is because we try to >> do one request_irq with in another and that results in kmalloc being >> c

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] DRIVERS: IRQCHIP: Add crossbar irqchip driver

2013-09-12 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Thursday 12 September 2013 06:22 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> Specifically for the IRQ case addressed here, the cross-bar IP >> sits between the interrupt controller and peripheral interrupts. >> >> CPU <-- GIC <

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] DRIVERS: IRQCHIP: Add crossbar irqchip driver

2013-09-12 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Thursday 12 September 2013 08:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Thursday 12 September 2013 06:22 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>> Now the real question is, how that expansion mechanism is supposed to >>> work. There

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] DRIVERS: IRQCHIP: Add crossbar irqchip driver

2013-09-13 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Friday 13 September 2013 10:24 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Thursday 12 September 2013 08:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>> Let me summarize: >>> >>>- GIC supports up to 160 interrupts >>> &g

Re: [PATCH] sched_clock: fix postinit no sched_clock function check

2013-10-09 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Wednesday 09 October 2013 07:59 PM, John Stultz wrote: > On 10/02/2013 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Wednesday 02 October 2013 01:48 PM, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 06:42:40PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>>> On 10/02/13 10:27, Santosh

Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] clk: dt: bindings for mux, divider & gate clocks

2013-08-29 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
support and tested these patches on Keystone EVM. Will post those patches soon on the lists. For the series if you need more tested-by tags, feel free to add, Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a messa

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio/omap: maintain GPIO and IRQ usage separately

2013-09-27 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
is approach, am fine with both of your patches. Again thanks a lot for fixing the long nagging issue. FWIW, Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at h

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] DRIVERS: IRQCHIP: Add support for crossbar IP

2013-09-30 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 30 September 2013 09:59 AM, Sricharan R wrote: > Some socs have a large number of interrupts requests to service > the needs of its many peripherals and subsystems. All of the interrupt > requests lines from the subsystems are not needed at the same > time, so they have to be muxed to the

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] DRIVERS: IRQCHIP: IRQ-GIC: Add support for routable irqs

2013-09-30 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Monday 30 September 2013 10:16 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 30/09/13 14:59, Sricharan R wrote: >> In some socs the gic can be preceded by a crossbar IP which >> routes the peripheral interrupts to the gic inputs. The peripheral >> interrupts are associated with a fixed crossbar input line and th

Re: [RFC] gpio/omap: auto-setup a GPIO when used as an IRQ

2013-09-23 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
Javier, On Monday 23 September 2013 01:07 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Javier Martinez Canillas [130923 10:09]: >> On 09/23/2013 06:45 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> >>> Hmm does this still work for legacy platform data based >>> drivers that are doing gpio_request() first? >>> >> >> Yes it still w

Re: [RFC v2] gpio/omap: auto-setup a GPIO when used as an IRQ

2013-09-24 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 11:45 AM, Balaji T K wrote: > On Tuesday 24 September 2013 09:10 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> * Javier Martinez Canillas [130924 01:06]: >>> The OMAP GPIO controller HW requires a pin to be configured in GPIO >>> input mode in order to operate as an interrupt input. Sin

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >