Re: [PATCH] Intel IXP4xx network drivers v.2 - Ethernet and HSS

proprietary driver. We should all rejoice in that, support the author of these patches, and not fight amongst ourselves. -- Rod Whitby -- NSLU2-Linux Project Lead - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [PATCH] Intel IXP4xx network drivers v.2 - Ethernet and HSS

Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 08:16:38PM +0930, Rod Whitby wrote: >> So, if the author of these patches wishes to concentrate on big-endian >> support first, then we will not say (and have not said) anything which >> will block inclusion of a big-endian

Re: Libata PATA status

sata-via driver for this chipset booting from an IDE drive. I'll contact you separately for this issue (as it's off-topic on this thread). Thanks, -- Rod Whitby -- NSLU2-Linux Project Lead - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Why run ixp4xx LE? (Was: [PATCH] Intel IXP4xx network drivers v.2 - Ethernet and HSS)

Michael-Luke Jones wrote: > On 8 May 2007, at 09:48, Alexey Zaytsev wrote: > >> I was always curious, why do people want to run ixp4xx in LE mode? What >> are the benefits that overweight the obvious performance degradation? > > Debian. > http://www.debian.org/ports/arm/ And also out-of-kernel d