On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:22:32AM +1000, Robert Norris wrote:
> We have a number of Intel x3550 servers (Intel 5000-series). They've
> been running 3.7.2 fine.
>
> In the last week I've run 3.8.11, 3.8.12 and 3.9.2 on them. All have
> long hangs at boot, and later h
Hi Jean,
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:20:44AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Thanks a lot for reporting and even more for bisecting it, I know it
> takes time. I apologize for the trouble. I suppose I should have been
> a bit more cautious with the 63xxESB chips as they are a different
> family of har
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:49:23PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 0
>
> Hmm, this "IRQ 0" is quite odd. I'm wondering if this could be the
> reason for this hang. Was it with the i2c-i801 driver loaded, or
> blacklisted? Please check if it makes a difference.
Th
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:36:22AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> IPMI is still likely to access the SMBus controller. If there's a BMC
> in the machine, it can also access the SMBus slave with its own
> controller. It would be good to rule this out by disabling IPMI
> completely, removing the BMC fr
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:54:33PM +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> Was Robert able to get the system working without hangs by disabling
> the IRQ feature of i2c-i801 module when it was builtin?
Yes. There are no hangs when interrupts are explicitly disabled with
disable_features=0x10 or when 6676a847
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:49:28AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hmm, can you please dump the PCI configuration space of the SMBus
> controller?
>
> # /sbin/lspci -s 00:1f.3 -xxx
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB/3100 Chipset SMBus Controller
(rev 09)
00: 86 80 9b 26 41 05 80 02 09
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:36:22AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> IPMI is still likely to access the SMBus controller. If there's a BMC
> in the machine, it can also access the SMBus slave with its own
> controller. It would be good to rule this out by disabling IPMI
> completely, removing the BMC fr
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013, at 02:42 PM, li guang wrote:
> seems tasks are hogging your cpu/memory resource, did you check status
> your servicing processes?
According to my monitoring I have plenty of CPU and memory free at the
time the problem occurs. What specifically are you looking at the data I
pr
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:55:41PM +1100, Robert Norris wrote:
> The console shows a new "BUG: soft lockup" line every few seconds
Looking closer, the whole thing starts with a _hard_ lockup.
2013-03-26T08:33:39.921834-04:00 imap30 kernel: [185090.090328] Watchdog
detected hard
9 matches
Mail list logo
